### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run any version of `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node validates blocks on mainnet, testnet, or any network where both Zebra and zcashd nodes participate. All default configurations are affected. No feature flags, non-default settings, or special build options are required. ### Summary Zebra's P2SH sigop counter uses a pure-Rust code path that short-circuits on disabled opcodes (such as `OP_CODESEPARATOR`), returning a partial count of zero for any sigops following the disabled opcode. The reference implementation (zcashd) correctly counts through disabled opcodes in its static sigop analysis. This produces a consensus divergence: Zebra accepts blocks that zcashd rejects when the block-wide `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold is crossed on one side but not the other. An attacker can exploit this without mining capability. Broadcasting transactions that spend P2SH outputs with malicious redeem scripts is sufficient; any Zebra miner who includes those transactions in a block triggers a chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. ### Details The P2SH sigop counter at `zebra-script/src/lib.rs:399` calls `script::Code(redeemed_bytes).sig_op_count(true)`, which is a pure-Rust path through `zcash_script-0.4.4`. The legacy (non-P2SH) sigop counter at `lib.rs:282-289` correctly uses the C++ FFI via `interpreter.legacy_sigop_count_script()`. Only the P2SH path bypasses the FFI. The Rust parser in `zcash_script-0.4.4/src/opcode/mod.rs:1247-1260` treats 16 disabled opcodes (0x7e through 0xab, including `OP_CAT`, `OP_SUBSTR`, `OP_AND`, `OP_OR`, `OP_XOR`, `OP_2MUL`, `OP_2DIV`, `OP_MUL`, `OP_DIV`, `OP_MOD`, `OP_LSHIFT`, `OP_RSHIFT`, and `OP_CODESEPARATOR`) as `Err(Error::Disabled(...))`. The `sig_op_count` function at `iter.rs:104-115` uses `try_fold`, which terminates on the first `Err` and returns the partial sum accumulated so far. zcashd's `GetOp2` (`script.h:514-562`) returns `true` for all non-push opcodes including the disabled range. Its `GetSigOpCount(true)` (`script.cpp:152-174`) continues counting through disabled opcodes. zcashd rejects disabled opcodes at execution time in the interpreter, not during static sigop analysis. A redeem script of `[0xab, OP_CHECKMULTISIG x 50]` produces: Zebra = 0 sigops, zcashd = 1,000 sigops. Across 21 inputs in a block, Zebra computes 0 while zcashd computes 21,000, crossing the `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold on one side only. ### Patches Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix routes the P2SH sigop counter through the same C++ FFI already used by the legacy sigop counter. ### Workarounds There is no configuration-level workaround. All Zebra nodes validating blocks on a network shared with zcashd are affected. Upgrade as soon as the patched version is available. ### Impact A chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. The attacker broadcasts spending transactions referencing P2SH outputs whose redeem scripts contain a disabled opcode followed by `OP_CHECKSIG` or `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` opcodes. When a Zebra miner (estimated ~30% of current network hashrate) includes these transactions in a block, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it with `bad-blk-sigops`. The two halves of the network diverge and every subsequent block extending the Zebra-side tip inherits the divergence. The attacker does not need mining capability, RPC access, or any special privileges. The cost is the transaction fees for the funding and spending transactions. ### Credit Reported by `@samsulselfut` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run any version of `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node validates blocks on mainnet, testnet, or any network where both Zebra and zcashd nodes participate. All default configurations are affected. No feature flags, non-default settings, or special build options are required. ### Summary Zebra's P2SH sigop counter uses a pure-Rust code path that short-circuits on disabled opcodes (such as `OP_CODESEPARATOR`), returning a partial count of zero for any sigops following the disabled opcode. The reference implementation (zcashd) correctly counts through disabled opcodes in its static sigop analysis. This produces a consensus divergence: Zebra accepts blocks that zcashd rejects when the block-wide `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold is crossed on one side but not the other. An attacker can exploit this without mining capability. Broadcasting transactions that spend P2SH outputs with malicious redeem scripts is sufficient; any Zebra miner who includes those transactions in a block triggers a chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. ### Details The P2SH sigop counter at `zebra-script/src/lib.rs:399` calls `script::Code(redeemed_bytes).sig_op_count(true)`, which is a pure-Rust path through `zcash_script-0.4.4`. The legacy (non-P2SH) sigop counter at `lib.rs:282-289` correctly uses the C++ FFI via `interpreter.legacy_sigop_count_script()`. Only the P2SH path bypasses the FFI. The Rust parser in `zcash_script-0.4.4/src/opcode/mod.rs:1247-1260` treats 16 disabled opcodes (0x7e through 0xab, including `OP_CAT`, `OP_SUBSTR`, `OP_AND`, `OP_OR`, `OP_XOR`, `OP_2MUL`, `OP_2DIV`, `OP_MUL`, `OP_DIV`, `OP_MOD`, `OP_LSHIFT`, `OP_RSHIFT`, and `OP_CODESEPARATOR`) as `Err(Error::Disabled(...))`. The `sig_op_count` function at `iter.rs:104-115` uses `try_fold`, which terminates on the first `Err` and returns the partial sum accumulated so far. zcashd's `GetOp2` (`script.h:514-562`) returns `true` for all non-push opcodes including the disabled range. Its `GetSigOpCount(true)` (`script.cpp:152-174`) continues counting through disabled opcodes. zcashd rejects disabled opcodes at execution time in the interpreter, not during static sigop analysis. A redeem script of `[0xab, OP_CHECKMULTISIG x 50]` produces: Zebra = 0 sigops, zcashd = 1,000 sigops. Across 21 inputs in a block, Zebra computes 0 while zcashd computes 21,000, crossing the `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold on one side only. ### Patches Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix routes the P2SH sigop counter through the same C++ FFI already used by the legacy sigop counter. ### Workarounds There is no configuration-level workaround. All Zebra nodes validating blocks on a network shared with zcashd are affected. Upgrade as soon as the patched version is available. ### Impact A chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. The attacker broadcasts spending transactions referencing P2SH outputs whose redeem scripts contain a disabled opcode followed by `OP_CHECKSIG` or `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` opcodes. When a Zebra miner (estimated ~30% of current network hashrate) includes these transactions in a block, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it with `bad-blk-sigops`. The two halves of the network diverge and every subsequent block extending the Zebra-side tip inherits the divergence. The attacker does not need mining capability, RPC access, or any special privileges. The cost is the transaction fees for the funding and spending transactions. ### Credit Reported by `@samsulselfut` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
Update zebrad to 4.5.0; zebra-script to 7.0.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanzebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser affects zebrad (rust), zebra-script (rust). Severity is critical. ### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run any version of `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node validates blocks on mainnet, testnet, or any network where both Zebra and zcashd nodes participate. All default configurations are affected. No feature flags, non-default settings, or special build options are required. ### Summary Zebra's P2SH sigop counter uses a pure-Rust code path that short-circuits on disabled opcodes (such as `OP_CODESEPARATOR`), returning a partial count of zero for any sigops following the disabled opcode. The reference implementation (zcashd) correctly counts through disabled opcodes in its static sigop analysis. This produces a consensus divergence: Zebra accepts blocks that zcashd rejects when the block-wide `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold is crossed on one side but not the other. An attacker can exploit this without mining capability. Broadcasting transactions that spend P2SH outputs with malicious redeem scripts is sufficient; any Zebra miner who includes those transactions in a block triggers a chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. ### Details The P2SH sigop counter at `zebra-script/src/lib.rs:399` calls `script::Code(redeemed_bytes).sig_op_count(true)`, which is a pure-Rust path through `zcash_script-0.4.4`. The legacy (non-P2SH) sigop counter at `lib.rs:282-289` correctly uses the C++ FFI via `interpreter.legacy_sigop_count_script()`. Only the P2SH path bypasses the FFI. The Rust parser in `zcash_script-0.4.4/src/opcode/mod.rs:1247-1260` treats 16 disabled opcodes (0x7e through 0xab, including `OP_CAT`, `OP_SUBSTR`, `OP_AND`, `OP_OR`, `OP_XOR`, `OP_2MUL`, `OP_2DIV`, `OP_MUL`, `OP_DIV`, `OP_MOD`, `OP_LSHIFT`, `OP_RSHIFT`, and `OP_CODESEPARATOR`) as `Err(Error::Disabled(...))`. The `sig_op_count` function at `iter.rs:104-115` uses `try_fold`, which terminates on the first `Err` and returns the partial sum accumulated so far. zcashd's `GetOp2` (`script.h:514-562`) returns `true` for all non-push opcodes including the disabled range. Its `GetSigOpCount(true)` (`script.cpp:152-174`) continues counting through disabled opcodes. zcashd rejects disabled opcodes at execution time in the interpreter, not during static sigop analysis. A redeem script of `[0xab, OP_CHECKMULTISIG x 50]` produces: Zebra = 0 sigops, zcashd = 1,000 sigops. Across 21 inputs in a block, Zebra computes 0 while zcashd computes 21,000, crossing the `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold on one side only. ### Patches Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix routes the P2SH sigop counter through the same C++ FFI already used by the legacy sigop counter. ### Workarounds There is no configuration-level workaround. All Zebra nodes validating blocks on a network shared with zcashd are affected. Upgrade as soon as the patched version is available. ### Impact A chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. The attacker broadcasts spending transactions referencing P2SH outputs whose redeem scripts contain a disabled opcode followed by `OP_CHECKSIG` or `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` opcodes. When a Zebra miner (estimated ~30% of current network hashrate) includes these transactions in a block, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it with `bad-blk-sigops`. The two halves of the network diverge and every subsequent block extending the Zebra-side tip inherits the divergence. The attacker does not need mining capability, RPC access, or any special privileges. The cost is the transaction fees for the funding and spending transactions. ### Credit Reported by `@samsulselfut` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in rust. A critical vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| zebradrust | <=4.4.1 | 4.5.0 |
| zebra-scriptrust | <=6.0.1 | 7.0.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL GuardUpdate zebrad to 4.5.0; zebra-script to 7.0.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanzebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser affects zebrad (rust), zebra-script (rust). Severity is critical. ### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run any version of `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node validates blocks on mainnet, testnet, or any network where both Zebra and zcashd nodes participate. All default configurations are affected. No feature flags, non-default settings, or special build options are required. ### Summary Zebra's P2SH sigop counter uses a pure-Rust code path that short-circuits on disabled opcodes (such as `OP_CODESEPARATOR`), returning a partial count of zero for any sigops following the disabled opcode. The reference implementation (zcashd) correctly counts through disabled opcodes in its static sigop analysis. This produces a consensus divergence: Zebra accepts blocks that zcashd rejects when the block-wide `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold is crossed on one side but not the other. An attacker can exploit this without mining capability. Broadcasting transactions that spend P2SH outputs with malicious redeem scripts is sufficient; any Zebra miner who includes those transactions in a block triggers a chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. ### Details The P2SH sigop counter at `zebra-script/src/lib.rs:399` calls `script::Code(redeemed_bytes).sig_op_count(true)`, which is a pure-Rust path through `zcash_script-0.4.4`. The legacy (non-P2SH) sigop counter at `lib.rs:282-289` correctly uses the C++ FFI via `interpreter.legacy_sigop_count_script()`. Only the P2SH path bypasses the FFI. The Rust parser in `zcash_script-0.4.4/src/opcode/mod.rs:1247-1260` treats 16 disabled opcodes (0x7e through 0xab, including `OP_CAT`, `OP_SUBSTR`, `OP_AND`, `OP_OR`, `OP_XOR`, `OP_2MUL`, `OP_2DIV`, `OP_MUL`, `OP_DIV`, `OP_MOD`, `OP_LSHIFT`, `OP_RSHIFT`, and `OP_CODESEPARATOR`) as `Err(Error::Disabled(...))`. The `sig_op_count` function at `iter.rs:104-115` uses `try_fold`, which terminates on the first `Err` and returns the partial sum accumulated so far. zcashd's `GetOp2` (`script.h:514-562`) returns `true` for all non-push opcodes including the disabled range. Its `GetSigOpCount(true)` (`script.cpp:152-174`) continues counting through disabled opcodes. zcashd rejects disabled opcodes at execution time in the interpreter, not during static sigop analysis. A redeem script of `[0xab, OP_CHECKMULTISIG x 50]` produces: Zebra = 0 sigops, zcashd = 1,000 sigops. Across 21 inputs in a block, Zebra computes 0 while zcashd computes 21,000, crossing the `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold on one side only. ### Patches Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix routes the P2SH sigop counter through the same C++ FFI already used by the legacy sigop counter. ### Workarounds There is no configuration-level workaround. All Zebra nodes validating blocks on a network shared with zcashd are affected. Upgrade as soon as the patched version is available. ### Impact A chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. The attacker broadcasts spending transactions referencing P2SH outputs whose redeem scripts contain a disabled opcode followed by `OP_CHECKSIG` or `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` opcodes. When a Zebra miner (estimated ~30% of current network hashrate) includes these transactions in a block, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it with `bad-blk-sigops`. The two halves of the network diverge and every subsequent block extending the Zebra-side tip inherits the divergence. The attacker does not need mining capability, RPC access, or any special privileges. The cost is the transaction fees for the funding and spending transactions. ### Credit Reported by `@samsulselfut` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in rust. A critical vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| zebradrust | <=4.4.1 | 4.5.0 |
| zebra-scriptrust | <=6.0.1 | 7.0.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL Guard