HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 53721 nuxt route rule middleware bypass via case
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High severityCVE-2026-53721GHSA-MM7M-92G8-7M47

Nuxt: Route-rule middleware bypass via case-sensitivity mismatch between vue-router and the routeRules matcherCVE-2026-53721

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-53721 records a High severity vulnerability in Nuxt: Route-rule middleware bypass via case-sensitivity mismatch between vue-router and the routeRules matcher. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 2, 2026Updated Jun 16, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Jun 16, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
nuxtnpm>=3.11.0,<3.21.73.21.7
nuxtnpm>=4.0.0,<4.4.74.4.7

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for nuxt, nuxt.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update nuxt to 3.21.7; nuxt to 4.4.7 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Jun 16, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
Upstream source description

## Impact Nuxt looks up `routeRules` for the current navigation by calling `getRouteRules({ path: to.path })` from the page-router plugin and the no-pages router plugin. The compiled `routeRules` matcher (built on `rou3`) performs case-sensitive matching, while vue-router is configured with its default `sensitive: false` and matches paths case-insensitively. The two routers therefore disagree on which rules apply to a given request path: vue-router still matches the page record for `/Admin/dashboard`, but the `routeRules` lookup for the same path returns no match. Any `appMiddleware` declared via `routeRules` is never added to the middleware set and never runs, on both SSR and client navigations. The same path skips other path-keyed route rules in the same way (`ssr`, `redirect`, `appLayout`, and the prerender / payload hints used client-side). For applications using `routeRules` with `appMiddleware` as an authorization gate (a documented pattern), an attacker can flip the case of any static segment in a protected URL (for example `/Admin/dashboard` instead of `/admin/dashboard`) to render the protected page with the middleware skipped. The server returns the fully server-rendered page including any `useFetch` / `useAsyncData` results captured during SSR. This is an instance of CWE-178 (Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity) leading to CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) for apps that treat `appMiddleware` as an authorization boundary. ## Mitigating factors - Only affects apps that use `routeRules.appMiddleware`. The more idiomatic `definePageMeta({ middleware })` is bound to the matched route record and is unaffected. - Nuxt route middleware is documented as an app-layer concern, not a server-side auth boundary; well-built apps enforce authorization again at the API / data-fetching layer. - Apps that explicitly set `router.options.sensitive = true` are not affected. ## Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`07e39cd6`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/07e39cd6f26e407b4192b7865bd17bc44536b9bb)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`3f3e3fa7`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/3f3e3fa7b5eec8e495f4f8ce0a54813a8875a11e)). The fix normalizes the path used for `routeRules` lookups so it matches vue-router's default case-insensitive semantics. ## Workarounds Until you can upgrade, you can mitigate by either: 1. Setting `router.options.sensitive = true` so vue-router matches case-sensitively (this changes route-matching behaviour app-wide). 2. Moving security-critical middleware off `routeRules.appMiddleware` and onto `definePageMeta({ middleware: [...] })` on the protected page components, which is bound to the matched record. 3. Enforcing authorization at the API / data-fetching layer (which you should be doing in any case). ## Credit Reported by Anthropic / Claude through Anthropic's coordinated vulnerability disclosure process. Reference: ANT-2026-9FSEBYMC.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-178, CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record