HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 53722 nuxt reflected xss in nuxtlink via unsanitised
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium severityCVE-2026-53722GHSA-934W-87QH-QR26

Nuxt: Reflected XSS in `<NuxtLink>` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URLCVE-2026-53722

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-53722 records a Medium severity vulnerability in Nuxt: Reflected XSS in `<NuxtLink>` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URL. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 2, 2026Updated Aug 14, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Aug 14, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
XSS
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-79, CWE-83
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
nuxtnpm>=3.0.0 <3.21.73.21.7
nuxtnpm>=4.0.0,<4.4.74.4.7
nuxtnpm<3.21.73.21.7
nuxtnpm>=3.0.0,<3.21.73.21.7
nuxtnpm>=4.0.0 <4.4.74.4.7

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for nuxt, nuxt, nuxt.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update nuxt to 3.21.7; nuxt to 4.4.7; nuxt to 3.21.7; nuxt to 3.21.7; nuxt to 4.4.7 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary `<NuxtLink>` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `<a>` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `<NuxtLink :to>` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically. Unlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs. ### Affected component - File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts` - Sink: `h('a', { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot. - Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as `<a href>` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path. ### Impact Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`<NuxtLink :to="user.website">`), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `<NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links. For `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. ### Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `<a>` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string. ### Workarounds Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Media Library Assistant < 3.44 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via mla_item_parameter Shortcode AttributeAlso CWE-79
  • PostyBirb Plus Submission Description Editor DescriptionInput.tsx cross site scriptingAlso CWE-79
  • Thelia before 3.1.0 Stored XSS via Coupon Condition Customer NameAlso CWE-79
  • Thelia before 3.1.1 Stored XSS via SVG Store Logo and Banner UploadsAlso CWE-79
  • WebDyne versions from 2.014 before 3.022 for Perl reflect request parameters unescaped into form field values, allowing cross-site scriptingAlso CWE-79