### Summary `<NuxtLink>` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `<a>` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `<NuxtLink :to>` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically. Unlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs. ### Affected component - File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts` - Sink: `h('a', { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot. - Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as `<a href>` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path. ### Impact Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`<NuxtLink :to="user.website">`), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `<NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links. For `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. ### Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `<a>` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string. ### Workarounds Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).
### Summary `<NuxtLink>` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `<a>` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `<NuxtLink :to>` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically. Unlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs. ### Affected component - File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts` - Sink: `h('a', { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot. - Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as `<a href>` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path. ### Impact Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`<NuxtLink :to="user.website">`), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `<NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links. For `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. ### Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `<a>` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string. ### Workarounds Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).
Update nuxt to 4.4.7; nuxt to 3.21.7 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanNuxt: Reflected XSS in `<NuxtLink>` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URL affects nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Severity is medium. ### Summary `<NuxtLink>` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `<a>` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `<NuxtLink :to>` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically. Unlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs. ### Affected component - File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts` - Sink: `h('a', { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot. - Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as `<a href>` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path. ### Impact Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`<NuxtLink :to="user.website">`), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `<NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links. For `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. ### Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `<a>` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string. ### Workarounds Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in npm. A medium vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| nuxtnpm | >=4.0.0,<4.4.7 | 4.4.7 |
| nuxtnpm | <3.21.7 | 3.21.7 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL GuardUpdate nuxt to 4.4.7; nuxt to 3.21.7 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanNuxt: Reflected XSS in `<NuxtLink>` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URL affects nuxt (npm), nuxt (npm). Severity is medium. ### Summary `<NuxtLink>` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `<a>` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `<NuxtLink :to>` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically. Unlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs. ### Affected component - File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts` - Sink: `h('a', { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot. - Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as `<a href>` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path. ### Impact Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`<NuxtLink :to="user.website">`), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `<NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links. For `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link. ### Patches Fixed in `[email protected]` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `[email protected]` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `<a>` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string. ### Workarounds Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `<NuxtLink :to>` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).
AI coding agents often install or upgrade packages automatically in npm. A medium vulnerability in a dependency can be pulled into a project through a normal install or update without a human reviewing the change, expanding the blast radius from a single package to every agent workspace that depends on it.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| nuxtnpm | >=4.0.0,<4.4.7 | 4.4.7 |
| nuxtnpm | <3.21.7 | 3.21.7 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL Guard