Answer in brief
CVE-2026-54205 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.3) vulnerability in TeamDavid: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via 'pathname' parameter in link storing functionality. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavid (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 6.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavid (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavidgeneric | 0 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 7, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 7, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 7, 2026
Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox 's link storing functionality (//ServerClient_celink.htm) accepts a “pathname” parameter, which can be set to network locations using UNC paths (e.g., “\\Server\Share”). The server processes these paths without validation, resulting in outbound connection attempts to attacker-controlled SMB servers. This enables authenticated attackers to trigger the server to authenticate to arbitrary SMB endpoints, potentially exposing NTLM authentication information (such as NTLM hashes). If outbound connections to port 445 (SMB) are permitted, attackers can use this to conduct SMB relay or credential theft attacks. Exploitation of the “pathname” parameter is possible without authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-54205 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.3) vulnerability in TeamDavid: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via 'pathname' parameter in link storing functionality. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavid (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 6.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavid (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Tobit Laboratories AG/TeamDavidgeneric | 0 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 7, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 7, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 7, 2026
Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox 's link storing functionality (//ServerClient_celink.htm) accepts a “pathname” parameter, which can be set to network locations using UNC paths (e.g., “\\Server\Share”). The server processes these paths without validation, resulting in outbound connection attempts to attacker-controlled SMB servers. This enables authenticated attackers to trigger the server to authenticate to arbitrary SMB endpoints, potentially exposing NTLM authentication information (such as NTLM hashes). If outbound connections to port 445 (SMB) are permitted, attackers can use this to conduct SMB relay or credential theft attacks. Exploitation of the “pathname” parameter is possible without authentication. This issue affects TeamDavid through Rollout 524.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.