HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 54592 oj stack buffer overflow in ojdoceachchild via
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-54592GHSA-3M6Q-JJ5J-38C9

Oj: Stack Buffer Overflow in Oj::Doc#each_child via Deeply Nested InputCVE-2026-54592

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-54592 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in Oj: Stack Buffer Overflow in Oj::Doc#each_child via Deeply Nested Input. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps oj (rubygems), oj (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 19, 2026Updated Oct 25, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Oct 25, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps oj (rubygems), oj (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
ojrubygems<3.17.33.17.3
ojrubygems>=0 <3.17.33.17.3

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for oj, oj.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update oj to 3.17.3; oj to 3.17.3 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:nvd:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary `Oj::Doc#each_child`, when invoked recursively over a deeply nested JSON document, overflows a fixed-size stack buffer and aborts the process. This is a denial of service reachable from untrusted JSON. ### Details Two-step chain in `ext/oj/fast.c`: 1. **`doc_each_child` (~line 1501)** increments `doc->where` past the `where_path[MAX_STACK = 100]` array with no bounds check, and never restores it (`doc->where--` is missing). Calling `each_child` recursively from inside the yield block therefore drives `doc->where` beyond the array. 2. **On the next entry (~line 1478)** the function copies the path into a stack-local buffer: ```c Leaf save_path[MAX_STACK]; // 800-byte stack buffer size_t wlen = doc->where - doc->where_path; if (0 < wlen) { memcpy(save_path, doc->where_path, sizeof(Leaf) * (wlen + 1)); } ``` When the previous recursive call left `doc->where` past `where_path[100]`, `wlen` exceeds `MAX_STACK` and the `memcpy` overflows `save_path` on the C stack. The `Oj::Doc` parser imposes no JSON nesting-depth limit (it relies on a C-stack pressure check), so deeply nested attacker input reaches this path. ### Proof of Concept ```ruby require 'oj' depth = 200 payload = '[' * depth + '1' + ']' * depth Oj::Doc.open(payload) do |doc| r = lambda { doc.each_child { |_| r.call } } r.call end ``` Recursion depth <= 99 iterates normally; depth >= 101 aborts. lldb backtrace on the affected build (`ruby 3.3.8 / arm64-darwin24`): ``` SIGABRT #2 __abort #3 __stack_chk_fail #4 doc_each_child (oj.bundle, fast.c) ``` ### Impact Reliable denial of service: any endpoint that calls `Oj::Doc.open(untrusted) { |d| d.each_child ... }` recursively can be crashed with a small deeply-nested payload. On builds with a stack protector (the default, `-fstack-protector-strong`) the canary aborts the process before the saved return address is used. The Step-1 heap OOB writes into `struct _doc` fields do occur, but are masked in practice because the Step-2 stack overflow crashes first; turning them into anything beyond a crash has not been demonstrated. ### Patches Fixed in **3.17.3**: `doc_each_child` now bounds-checks before incrementing `doc->where` (raising `Oj::DepthError`) and restores `doc->where` after the loop, matching the existing `each_leaf` pattern. Verified on the fixed build: depth >= 101 raises a clean `Oj::DepthError` instead of aborting. ### Credit Reported by Zac Wang (@7a6163).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Buffer Overflow
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-125, CWE-787
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record