HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 55092 trivy has a path traversal via a crafted
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-55092GHSA-MCJ4-MPHF-J9FF

Trivy has a path traversal via a crafted vulnerability database or other downloaded artifactsCVE-2026-55092

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-55092 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in Trivy has a path traversal via a crafted vulnerability database or other downloaded artifacts. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/aquasecurity/trivy (go), github.com/aquasecurity/trivy (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 25, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 10, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 25, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/aquasecurity/trivy (go), github.com/aquasecurity/trivy (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/aquasecurity/trivygo<0.71.10.71.1
github.com/aquasecurity/trivygo>=0 <0.71.10.71.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/aquasecurity/trivy, github.com/aquasecurity/trivy.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update github.com/aquasecurity/trivy to 0.71.1; github.com/aquasecurity/trivy to 0.71.1 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary When Trivy downloads an OCI artifact, it uses the `org.opencontainers.image.title` annotation from the artifact manifest as the destination filename without validation. An attacker who can make Trivy fetch an attacker-controlled artifact can supply a crafted annotation that resolves to a path outside the intended destination, causing Trivy to write the layer content to an arbitrary location on the host filesystem. ## Affected configurations Exploitation requires the attacker to direct Trivy at an attacker-controlled OCI artifact via one of the following inputs: | Input | Used for | | --- | --- | | `--db-repository` flag, `TRIVY_DB_REPOSITORY` environment variable, or `db.repository` in `trivy.yaml` | Vulnerability database | | `--java-db-repository` flag, `TRIVY_JAVA_DB_REPOSITORY` environment variable, or `db.java-repository` in `trivy.yaml` | Java vulnerability database | | `--checks-bundle-repository` flag (and the deprecated `--policy-bundle-repository` alias), `TRIVY_CHECKS_BUNDLE_REPOSITORY` environment variable, or `misconfiguration.checks-bundle-repository` in `trivy.yaml` | Misconfiguration checks bundle | | Repository argument to `trivy module install <REPO>` | WASM module installation | Realistic scenarios in which an attacker may influence these inputs include a copy-pasted command or documentation snippet pointing to an untrusted mirror, or a third-party mirror that turns out to be hostile. Trivy's default configuration, which downloads these artifacts from Aqua-operated repositories, is not affected. The risk applies only when one of the inputs above is overridden to download a different artifact. ## Impact An attacker who satisfies the conditions above can overwrite or create arbitrary files on the host filesystem within the privilege boundary of the user running Trivy. The vulnerability does not grant any privileges beyond what that user already has. The practical impact depends on the deployment. In environments where the running user can overwrite files such as SSH `authorized_keys`, shell startup files, cron entries, or binaries on `PATH`, the file write may be leveraged to achieve code execution as that user. In more restricted deployments, the impact is bounded to the user's writable scope but may still allow tampering with scan results, build artifacts, or other files consumed by subsequent steps in the same pipeline. ## Patches Fixed in Trivy `0.71.1`. Users should upgrade to that release or later. ## Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, do not download Trivy artifacts (vulnerability database, Java database, misconfiguration checks bundle, modules, etc.) from OCI repositories you do not operate or trust. ## Credits Reported by @ikkebr.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Contao: Path traversal in the images controllerAlso CWE-22
  • Shiny for Python - Path traversal in bookmark restoreAlso CWE-22
  • OWASP Coraza WAF: ProcessURI silently drops QUERY_STRING and ARGS_GET on URI parse failure — defense-in-depth bypass for non-net/http integrationsSame go ecosystem
  • OWASP Coraza WAF: JSON body processor: argument-limit truncation reopens an unbounded-depth gjson.Valid stack overflow (process crash)Same go ecosystem
  • OWASP Coraza WAF: Unbounded recursion in JSON response body processor causes CPU exhaustionSame go ecosystem
  • OWASP Coraza WAF: Resource exhaustion via deferred file handle accumulation in multipart body processorSame go ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-22
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 10, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record