HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 56211 libaom libaom remote code execution via svc layer
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Contribute to HOL
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High ยท CVSS 7.1CVE-2026-56211

Libaom: libaom: remote code execution via svc layer context handling with attacker-controlled framesCVE-2026-56211

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-56211 records a High severity (CVSS 7.1) vulnerability in Libaom: libaom: remote code execution via svc layer context handling with attacker-controlled frames. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Red Hat/firefox (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cpu-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-12.9-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-13.0-rhel9 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 19, 2026Updated Nov 4, 2026Source checked Nov 5, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Nov 4, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High ยท CVSS 7.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
28 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Red Hat/firefox (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cpu-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-12.9-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-13.0-rhel9 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Red Hat/firefoxgeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-12.9-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-13.0-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-gaudi-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-neuron-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-rocm-6.4-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-rocm-7.0-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-rocm-7.1-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-spyre-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhai/base-image-tpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/model-opt-cuda-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-cpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-neuron-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-spyre-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-gaudi-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-neuron-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhaii/vllm-tpu-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/rhoai/odh-trustyai-garak-lls-provider-dsp-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/thunderbirdgeneric*Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Red Hat/firefox, Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cpu-rhel9, Red Hat/rhai/base-image-cuda-12.9-rhel9.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: There is no complete mitigation for this vulnerability. The following measures can reduce risk: 1. If using libaom as a standalone encoder in a fork-based service, validate all SVC layer parameters (spatial_layer_id, temporal_layer_id) against configured bounds before passing them to the encoder API. 2. Avoid fork-based architectures for encoding services that accept untrusted input. Use thread-based or container-isolated workers instead, which prevent crash oracle attacks. 3. Restrict access to encoding services to trusted clients only. Do not expose SVC encoder configuration or frame submission to untrusted network input. 4. For Firefox and Thunderbird, ensure browsers are updated to versions that include the patched libaom (v3.14.0 or later). 5. Enable all available exploit mitigations (ASLR, PIE, stack canaries, CFI) on encoding service binaries.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Nov 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referenceaomedia.googlesource.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
  • Source referenceissues.chromium.org
  • Source referencesecurity.access.redhat.com
Upstream source description

A remote code execution vulnerability was found in libaom, the reference AV1 codec implementation. Insufficient bounds validation in the AV1 encoder's SVC (Scalable Video Coding) layer ID control allows an attacker to supply crafted video frame pixels that overlap with internal encoder layer context structures. In fork-based video processing services, an attacker can use this to hijack the cyclic refresh map pointer, brute-force the process base address via a crash oracle, and redirect control flow to achieve arbitrary command execution. Exploitation requires the target service to use libaom with SVC encoding enabled and accept attacker-supplied video frames.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Memory Corruption
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-787
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 5, 2026
References
53 linked sources
Open source record