HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 56741 jline3 telnet server unauthenticated remote dos
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-56741GHSA-2R2C-CX56-8933

JLine3 Telnet server: Unauthenticated Remote DoS via Unbounded Telnet NAWS Terminal GeometryCVE-2026-56741

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-56741 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in JLine3 Telnet server: Unauthenticated Remote DoS via Unbounded Telnet NAWS Terminal Geometry. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jun 18, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 17, 2026First seen by HOL Jun 19, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
8 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven), org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (maven) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:jline:jline:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven<4.2.14.2.1
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven>=4.1.0,<4.2.14.2.1
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven>=4.0.0,<4.0.164.0.16
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven<3.30.143.30.14
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven>=4.1.0 <4.2.14.2.1
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven>=4.0.0 <4.0.164.0.16
org.jline:jline-remote-telnetmaven>=0 <3.30.143.30.14

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for org.jline:jline-remote-telnet, org.jline:jline-remote-telnet, org.jline:jline-remote-telnet.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 4.2.1; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 4.2.1; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 4.0.16; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 3.30.14; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 4.2.1; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 4.0.16; org.jline:jline-remote-telnet to 3.30.14 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jun 18, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jun 19, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary The JLine3 Telnet server (`remote-telnet` module) does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS (Negotiate About Window Size) option. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a NAWS subnegotiation advertising a 65535×65535 terminal and repeatedly alternate values to trigger continuous, expensive rendering work on the server, causing CPU exhaustion and denial of service. ### Details `TelnetIO.handleNAWS()` (TelnetIO.java:856-879) reads the client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes them to `setTerminalGeometry()`: ```java // TelnetIO.java:869-875 private void setTerminalGeometry(int columns, int rows) { if (columns < SMALLEST_BELIEVABLE_WIDTH) columns = DEFAULT_WIDTH; // lower bound only if (rows < SMALLEST_BELIEVABLE_HEIGHT) rows = DEFAULT_HEIGHT; connectionData.setTerminalGeometry(columns, rows); connection.processConnectionEvent( new ConnectionEvent(connection, ConnectionEvent.Type.CONNECTION_TERMINAL_GEOMETRY_CHANGED)); } ``` Only a *lower* bound is enforced (minimum 20 columns / 6 rows). Values up to 65535 are accepted and stored. The geometry change event propagates to Telnet.java:153-158 where it calls: terminal.setSize(new Size(65535, 65535)); terminal.raise(Signal.WINCH); The WINCH signal triggers `LineReaderImpl.handleSignal()` → `redisplay()`. Inside `redisplay()`, multiple paths iterate up to `size.getColumns()` times: - `freshLine()` (LineReaderImpl.java:937,953): loops `size.getColumns()-1` = **65534 iterations**, building and writing a space-padding string across the network socket. - `columnSplitLength(terminal, size.getColumns(), ...)`: called multiple times, each processing all characters against the 65535-wide line width. Because WINCH only fires on *change*, the attacker alternates between two large values (e.g., 65535 and 65534) to trigger an unlimited stream of expensive render cycles. No authentication is required; the NAWS option is negotiated before any login sequence. Affected source files: - `remote-telnet/src/main/java/org/jline/builtins/telnet/TelnetIO.java` lines 856-879 - `remote-telnet/src/main/java/org/jline/builtins/telnet/Telnet.java` lines 140-175 - `reader/src/main/java/org/jline/reader/impl/LineReaderImpl.java` lines 929-962, 1293-1313 ### PoC Send the following two raw Telnet packets in a loop to a running JLine Telnet server. No login or authentication is required. Packet 1 — NAWS 65535 × 65535: FF FA 1F FF FF FF FF FF F0 (IAC SB NAWS 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF IAC SE) Packet 2 — NAWS 65534 × 65534: FF FA 1F FF FE FF FE FF F0 (IAC SB NAWS 0xFF 0xFE 0xFF 0xFE IAC SE) Sending these alternately at ~10 packets/second is sufficient to peg one CPU core on the server. The server remains in this state for as long as the connection is open. Reproduction environment: - JLine3 built from current master on x86_64 Linux, OpenJDK 25.0.2 - `remote-telnet` module started with its default `Telnet` server configuration - Test confirmed by source-code analysis and tracing the call chain at runtime ### Impact **Type**: Denial of Service (CPU exhaustion) **Who is affected**: Any application that embeds the JLine3 `remote-telnet` module and exposes its Telnet server on a network interface. The attacker requires no credentials. A single connection making ~10 alternating NAWS packets per second fully occupies the connection-handling thread and produces continuous I/O on the server's output stream. Because connection threads are re-used for the life of the session, one attacker per available connection slot can deny service to all users of that slot. ### Credits This issue was identified by Michał Majchrowicz and Marcin Wyczechowski, members of the AFINE Team.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-400
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 17, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record