Answer in brief
CVE-2026-59323 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in Micrometer Tracing Brave Bridge W3C Baggage propagation DoS vulnerability. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps VMware/Spring (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps VMware/Spring (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| VMware/Springgeneric | >=1.7.0 - 1.7.0 <1.7.0.1 || >=1.7.0 - 1.7.0 <1.7.1 || >=1.6.0 - 1.6.6 <1.6.6.1 || >=1.6.0 - 1.6.6 <1.6.7 || >=1.5.0 - 1.5.12 <1.5.13 || >=1.4.13 and earlier <1.4.14 | 1.7.0.1, 1.7.1, 1.6.6.1, 1.6.7, 1.5.13, 1.4.14 |
Published upstream
Aug 21, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 21, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 21, 2026
An application using Micrometer Tracing with W3C baggage propagation in the Brave bridge is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS) due to unbounded object allocation when extracting incoming baggage headers. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The application uses a vulnerable version of io.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-bridge-brave. * W3C propagation is active (either configured manually or active by default, such as in Spring Boot 3.x+). * Baggage propagation is enabled (which is the default in Spring Boot 3.x+) and a baggage manager (such as BraveBaggageManager) is configured to handle baggage fields. * The application processes requests or messages from untrusted sources with baggage headers which it normally should not, see: https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/#security-considerations . * Network components including the (HTTP) server that receives the request do not limit the header size or the limit is high enough to cause issues. The last two points are very important: normally this should not affect applications because they should not receive untrusted and unlimited input for baggage. * The application processes requests or messages from untrusted sources with baggage headers. When extracting baggage from the W3C baggage header, incoming entries are parsed without enforcing limits on the number of entries or header size as mandated by the W3C Baggage specification. An attacker can send requests or messages with artificially inflated baggage headers containing many key-value pairs, causing unconditional BaggageField allocations per entry. This leads to garbage collection pressure, high CPU usage, and potential application crash via OutOfMemoryError.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.