HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 59732 rclone archive extract allows s3 destination
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 5.0CVE-2026-59732GHSA-4VR5-P2GC-H23P

rclone archive extract allows S3 destination prefix escape via crafted archive pathsCVE-2026-59732

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-59732 records a Medium severity (CVSS 5.0) vulnerability in rclone archive extract allows S3 destination prefix escape via crafted archive paths. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps github.com/rclone/rclone (go), github.com/rclone/rclone (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 5, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 26, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 5, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 26, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 5.0
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 5.0. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps github.com/rclone/rclone (go), github.com/rclone/rclone (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
github.com/rclone/rclonego<=1.74.31.74.4
github.com/rclone/rclonego>=0 <1.74.41.74.4

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for github.com/rclone/rclone, github.com/rclone/rclone.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.74.4; github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.74.4 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 5, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

### Summary `rclone archive extract` can write extracted files outside the user-selected destination prefix when extracting a crafted archive. A malicious archive entry containing parent path components such as `../` can escape the requested extraction prefix and create or overwrite sibling objects in the same bucket/path scope. ### Details The affected code path is in `cmd/archive/extract/extract.go`. In `ArchiveExtract()`, the archive entry path is taken from `f.NameInArchive`. The code strips only a leading `./` prefix and then joins the archive entry path with the destination directory: ```go remote := f.NameInArchive remote = strings.TrimPrefix(remote, "./") if dstDir != "" { remote = path.Join(dstDir, remote) } _, err = operations.Rcat(ctx, dst, remote, fin, f.ModTime(), nil) ``` Parent path components such as `../` are not rejected before `path.Join()` is used. When the destination is an S3-style remote such as: ```text :s3:bucket/safe/prefix ``` rclone creates the destination filesystem rooted at `bucket/safe` and treats `prefix` as the destination directory. If the archive contains an entry named: ```text ../escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` then `path.Join("prefix", "../escaped-from-prefix.txt")` resolves to: ```text escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` As a result, the S3 backend uploads the object to: ```text bucket/safe/escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` instead of the expected destination: ```text bucket/safe/prefix/escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` This allows an attacker-controlled archive to escape the selected extraction prefix on object-storage remotes. ### PoC Test environment: - Windows 11 - rclone v1.74.3 official Windows amd64 binary - Local fake S3 HTTP endpoint - Crafted ZIP archive containing `../escaped-from-prefix.txt` Steps to reproduce:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P_cLKFgiWSVSATB8500yP28jdzwt9FAt/view?usp=sharing 1. Extract the attached PoC ZIP. 2. Run the PoC script: ```powershell powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\run-poc.ps1 -RcloneExe "C:\path\to\rclone.exe" ``` 3. The PoC creates a ZIP archive containing this entry: ```text ../escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` 4. The PoC starts a local fake S3 endpoint and runs rclone with an S3-style destination prefix: ```powershell rclone archive extract malicious.zip :s3:bucket/safe/prefix ``` 5. Observe the fake S3 request log. Expected safe behavior: ```text PUT /bucket/safe/prefix/escaped-from-prefix.txt ``` Observed behavior: ```text PUT /bucket/safe/escaped-from-prefix.txt?x-id=PutObject ``` This shows that the archive entry escaped the requested `safe/prefix` destination and was written under `safe/` instead. The PoC package includes: - `run-poc.ps1` - `fake-s3-server.py` - `README.md` - `report-draft.md` - captured proof logs ### Impact An attacker who supplies an archive that a victim extracts with `rclone archive extract` can cause extracted files to be written outside the destination prefix selected by the victim when the destination is an S3-style object storage remote. Depending on the victim's configured remote credentials and bucket permissions, this may allow creation or overwrite of sibling objects outside the intended extraction directory/prefix. This does not require compromising the S3 service itself. The attack relies on the victim extracting an attacker-controlled archive with rclone into an object-storage prefix.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.