HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 61438 praisonai vulnerable to remote code execution via
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.3CVE-2026-61438GHSA-26MH-57Q7-JFVR

PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST SandboxCVE-2026-61438

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-61438 records a High severity (CVSS 7.3) vulnerability in PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps praisonai (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 15, 2026Updated Oct 29, 2026Source checked Oct 29, 2026First seen by HOL Jul 15, 2026Material review Oct 29, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps praisonai (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
praisonaipip<4.6.784.6.78

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for praisonai.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update praisonai to 4.6.78 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 15, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 29, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jul 15, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
Upstream source description

### Summary JobWorkflowExecutor._exec_inline_python() is designed to safely execute inline Python expressions from YAML workflow script: steps using AST validation. The function claims to block dangerous operations by (a) checking all AST nodes against an allowlist, and (b) providing a __builtins__ whitelist that omits __import__, exec, eval, and open. The sandbox is broken. The module import allowlist (allowed_modules) explicitly includes 'os', and the AST allowlist permits ast.Import, ast.ImportFrom, ast.Call, and ast.Attribute nodes. This means the following malicious workflow script: step passes all AST validation checks and executes without error. Attack Scenario Attacker creates or contributes a YAML workflow file (type: job) with a script: step containing import os; os.system(...). A user or CI pipeline with PRAISONAI_ALLOW_JOB_WORKFLOWS=true executes the workflow via praisonai workflow run malicious.yaml. Arbitrary OS commands execute with the privileges of the calling process. This is particularly dangerous in multi-tenant or CI environments where YAML workflows may originate from untrusted sources (e.g., downloaded templates, shared repositories, AI-generated workflows). ### PoC _Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability._ ### Impact Root Cause — Lines 364–372: pythonallowed_modules = {'os', 'datetime', 'time', 'json', 'math', 're', 'collections', 'itertools'} if isinstance(node, ast.Import): for alias in node.names: if alias.name.split('.')[0] not in allowed_modules: return {"ok": False, "error": f"Import of '{alias.name}' not allowed..."} os is trusted because it is commonly used for path operations (os.path, os.getcwd). However, os.system(), os.popen(), os.execvp(), os.spawn*(), and os._exit() are all accessible once the module is imported, none of which are individually blocked. The __builtins__ restriction (blocking __import__) is irrelevant because the code uses a real import statement processed by the Python bytecode compiler — not a __import__() call. Proof-of-Concept validation (static — no remote network call made): pythonimport ast _ALLOWED_NODES = ( ast.Expression, ast.BoolOp, ast.BinOp, ast.UnaryOp, ast.Compare, ast.IfExp, ast.Constant, ast.Name, ast.Load, ast.Store, ast.Subscript, ast.List, ast.Tuple, ast.Dict, ast.Set, ast.And, ast.Or, ast.Not, ast.Eq, ast.NotEq, ast.Lt, ast.LtE, ast.Gt, ast.GtE, ast.In, ast.NotIn, ast.Add, ast.Sub, ast.Mult, ast.Div, ast.Mod, ast.FloorDiv, ast.USub, ast.UAdd, ast.Call, ast.Attribute, ast.keyword, ast.Starred, ast.Module, ast.Assign, ast.Import, ast.ImportFrom, ast.alias, ) allowed_modules = {'os', 'datetime', 'time', 'json', 'math', 're', 'collections', 'itertools'} malicious = "import os\nresult = os.system('id')" tree = ast.parse(malicious, mode="exec") all_pass = True for node in ast.walk(tree): if not isinstance(node, _ALLOWED_NODES): print(f"BLOCKED: {type(node).__name__}") all_pass = False if isinstance(node, ast.Import): for alias in node.names: if alias.name.split('.')[0] not in allowed_modules: print(f"IMPORT BLOCKED: {alias.name}") all_pass = False print("SANDBOX BYPASSED" if all_pass else "sandbox holds") # Output: SANDBOX BYPASSED Recommended Fix Remove 'os' from allowed_modules and replace it with only the safe submodule: 'os.path'. Then validate that the imported name is specifically os.path, not os: python# BEFORE (vulnerable) allowed_modules = {'os', 'datetime', 'time', 'json', 'math', 're', 'collections', 'itertools'} # AFTER (safe) allowed_modules = {'datetime', 'time', 'json', 'math', 're', 'collections', 'itertools', 'pathlib'} # If os.path is needed, handle it explicitly: if isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom): if node.module == 'os.path': pass # allow 'from os.path import join, exists' only elif node.module and node.module.split('.')[0] not in allowed_modules: return {"ok": False, "error": f"Import of '{node.module}' not allowed."} Additionally, block ast.Import of os entirely, and consider also removing re (which can be used for ReDoS/CPU exhaustion) and collections (which can be used to reach __subclasses__-style gadgets).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Rapid7 Insight Agent Local Privilege Escalation via Shell Injection in mcp.json Configuration PathAlso CWE-78

Record context

Vulnerability class
Command Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-78, CWE-184, CWE-693
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 29, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record