HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Gemini CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 61586 copernik xml factory stock jdk provider has
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Plugins
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High severityCVE-2026-61586GHSA-XM28-XVQC-GXXG

Copernik XML Factory (stock JDK provider) has Improper restriction of XInclude resource resolution

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-61586 records a High severity vulnerability in Copernik XML Factory (stock JDK provider) has Improper restriction of XInclude resource resolution. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps eu.copernik:copernik-xml-factory (maven). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 2, 2026Updated Oct 2, 2026Source checked Oct 2, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 2, 2026Material review Oct 2, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-611
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 2, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps eu.copernik:copernik-xml-factory (maven). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
eu.copernik:copernik-xml-factorymaven<0.1.20.1.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for eu.copernik:copernik-xml-factory.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update eu.copernik:copernik-xml-factory to 0.1.2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 2, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

Copernik XML Factory through `0.1.1`, when running on its stock JDK provider, does not block XInclude resource resolution after an application enables XInclude on a factory returned by `XmlFactories.newDocumentBuilderFactory()` or `XmlFactories.newSAXParserFactory()`, or on an `XMLReader` passed through `XmlFactories.harden()`. The library's documented guarantee that XInclude resolution stays disabled therefore does not hold on that provider. An application that parses untrusted XML in this configuration can be made to resolve `xi:include` references, allowing an attacker to read local files (information disclosure) or, through `http` hrefs, reach internal network endpoints (SSRF). All of the following conditions must hold for an application to be affected: - it obtains a factory from `XmlFactories.newDocumentBuilderFactory()` or `XmlFactories.newSAXParserFactory()`, or hardens an externally obtained `XMLReader` with `XmlFactories.harden()`; - the stock JDK provider is in effect, that is, Apache Xerces is not on the classpath; - XInclude is enabled, by calling `setXIncludeAware(true)` or the equivalent reader feature; - it parses XML from an untrusted source. The Xerces provider (selected when Xerces is on the classpath) and the Android provider are not affected. Applications are advised to upgrade to `0.1.2`, which fixes the defect. As a workaround add Apache Xerces (`xercesImpl`) to the classpath so the library selects its unaffected Xerces provider. ### Acknowledgements The maintainer thank the following people for finding, reporting, and helping to remediate this issue: - Finders: Ta Duc Thien and Duc Anh Nguyen (Danzation) - Remediation developer: Ta Duc Thien - Tooling: Claude Code (Anthropic), Claude Opus 4.8

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.