HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 63414 shopify app token exchange shop context confusion
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High severityCVE-2026-63414GHSA-6J52-38F8-QHXR

Shopify App: Token exchange shop context confusion may allow cross-shop authorization bypass in affected appsCVE-2026-63414

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-63414 records a High severity vulnerability in Shopify App: Token exchange shop context confusion may allow cross-shop authorization bypass in affected apps. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps shopify_app (rubygems), shopify_app (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 29, 2026Updated Oct 29, 2026Source checked Oct 29, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 29, 2026Material review Oct 29, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
2 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps shopify_app (rubygems), shopify_app (rubygems). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
shopify_apprubygems>=22.1.0,<23.0.323.0.3
shopify_apprubygems>=22.1.0 <23.0.323.0.3

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for shopify_app, shopify_app.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update shopify_app to 23.0.3; shopify_app to 23.0.3 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 29, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 29, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 29, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

In token-exchange authenticated controllers, `shopify_app` exposes shop context through helpers such as `current_shopify_domain`. Prior to the fix, `current_shopify_domain` could resolve to the sanitized `shop` query parameter instead of the shop identity derived from the verified Shopify ID token or active Shopify session. As a result, a request authenticated for one shop could include a different `shop` query parameter, causing application code to treat the requested shop as the current shop. Applications that used `current_shopify_domain`, or the request `shop` parameter, for authorization decisions, tenant lookup, stored access-token selection, or shop-scoped data access may have been vulnerable to cross-shop context confusion. The patched version hardens token-exchange handling so that: - `current_shopify_domain` resolves to the authenticated shop from the verified token or session. - `authenticated_shopify_domain` exposes the trusted authenticated shop. - `requested_shopify_domain` exposes the sanitized requested `shop` parameter for bootstrap or routing use cases only. - Token-exchange requests are rejected with `401 Unauthorized` when the requested shop does not match the authenticated shop. ## Impact In affected applications, an attacker with a valid Shopify session token for one shop could send an authenticated request that also supplied a different `shop` query parameter. If the application relied on `current_shopify_domain` or `params[:shop]` for security-sensitive shop scoping, application code could operate in the context of the requested shop rather than the authenticated shop. Affected applications are those that: 1. Use `shopify_app` token-exchange authentication; 2. Accept authenticated controller requests where a `shop` query parameter may be present; and 3. Use `current_shopify_domain` or the request `shop` parameter for authorization, tenant lookup, stored access-token selection, or shop-scoped resource access. Depending on the application’s authorization model, this could result in unauthorized access to another shop’s application data or unauthorized shop-scoped actions. ## Remediation Upgrade to `shopify_app` version `23.0.3` ## Workarounds Applications that cannot upgrade immediately should apply equivalent validation in token-exchange authenticated controllers: - Do not use `params[:shop]` for authorization, tenant lookup, access-token selection, or data scoping. - On vulnerable versions, avoid relying on `current_shopify_domain` for security-sensitive shop scoping if a `shop` query parameter may be present. - Use the authenticated shop from the verified ID token or active Shopify session instead, such as `current_shopify_session.shop` or the verified JWT `dest` value. - If a sanitized `params[:shop]` value is present, reject the request with `401 Unauthorized` when it does not match the authenticated shop. ## Credit This issue was responsibly reported by Hackerone researcher [leqtuer](https://hackerone.com/leqtuer?type=user).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Broken Function Level Authorization — `postcommand.php` allows execution of poller post-restart commands by non-admin usersAlso CWE-863
  • Nomad vulnerable to cross-namespace information disclosure in multiple endpointsAlso CWE-863
  • Incorrect authorization in issuer resolution in AWS Private CA Connector for KubernetesAlso CWE-863
  • Crass: Deeply nested CSS blocks and functions can trigger a SystemStackError or excessive memory usageSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Crass: A large number of adjacent CSS comments can trigger a SystemStackErrorSame rubygems ecosystem
  • Crass: Non-ASCII characters cause superlinear CPU consumptionSame rubygems ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 29, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record