HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 63735 surrealdb custom api route lets authenticated
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.1CVE-2026-63735GHSA-848M-R628-VRXW

SurrealDB: Custom API route lets authenticated callers override namespace/database scope via URL pathCVE-2026-63735

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-63735 records a High severity (CVSS 8.1) vulnerability in SurrealDB: Custom API route lets authenticated callers override namespace/database scope via URL path. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps surrealdb (rust). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 4, 2026Updated Sep 4, 2026Source checked Oct 19, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 4, 2026Material review Sep 4, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-639, CWE-862
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 19, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps surrealdb (rust). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
surrealdbrust<3.2.03.2.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for surrealdb.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update surrealdb to 3.2.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 4, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 4, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
Upstream source description

An authenticated user scoped to one namespace/database could invoke a custom API (`DEFINE API`) belonging to a different namespace/database, reaching another tenant's endpoint. The route `/api/{namespace}/{database}/{endpoint}` took the namespace and database from the URL and applied them to the caller's session before the endpoint was looked up or run, without checking that the caller's authenticated scope covered them. Because a custom API handler runs with permissions disabled (definer's rights), the endpoint's own `PERMISSIONS` clause was the only gate — open to everyone for a `PERMISSIONS FULL` endpoint. The `api::invoke()` function was affected the same way, resolving against the session's selected namespace/database (settable via the `surreal-ns` / `surreal-db` headers or `USE`). ### Impact What an attacker **can** do: - With valid credentials for any one namespace/database (a `VIEWER` is enough), invoke a custom API in another namespace/database by naming the victim scope in the URL. - Read data that endpoint returns — including from `PERMISSIONS NONE` tables, since the handler runs with permissions disabled — or trigger any writes and side effects it performs. What it **can't** do: - Reach a scope without valid credentials for some namespace/database on the instance; this is not an unauthenticated bypass. - Affect single-tenant deployments, or any deployment where callers already hold instance-wide (root) scope. ### Patches The namespace/database is now validated against the caller's authenticated level — which the request cannot change — before the endpoint is resolved or run. A target scope outside that level is rejected with `403 Forbidden`, both at the HTTP entry point and at the dispatch step shared with `api::invoke()`. Root reaches any scope; namespace principals their namespace; database and record principals their exact namespace/database; anonymous callers remain governed by the endpoint's `PERMISSIONS`. - Versions 3.2.0 and later are not affected by this issue. ### Workarounds Users unable to patch should consider the following workarounds: - Disable the custom API HTTP route via capabilities where it is not required. - Treat separate deployments, not namespace/database boundaries, as the tenant isolation boundary on shared instances. - Prefer a `PERMISSIONS WHERE` clause that checks the authenticated identity over `PERMISSIONS FULL` (reduces exposure but does not restore the boundary). ### Resources - [SurrealQL Documentation — DEFINE API](https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealql/statements/define/api) - [SurrealDB Documentation — Capabilities](https://surrealdb.com/docs/surrealdb/security/capabilities) - `fix(core/api): reject cross-tenant custom API access` (included in SurrealDB 3.2.0) ### Acknowledgements SurrealDB thanks [sondt99](https://github.com/sondt99) for reporting this issue.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.