Answer in brief
CVE-2026-63980 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in net/handshake: Use spin_lock_bh for hn_lock. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <06ab5978866fc2221b910347fd3e510ca8e7b1a4 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <0866569fc36a56f568acd3900d354e3505932e09 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <91898de9501a047ba67c6b864dcd403e00bdfbf5 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <cc993e0927ec8bd98ea33377ada03295fcda0f24 | 06ab5978866fc2221b910347fd3e510ca8e7b1a4, 0866569fc36a56f568acd3900d354e3505932e09, 91898de9501a047ba67c6b864dcd403e00bdfbf5, cc993e0927ec8bd98ea33377ada03295fcda0f24 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.7 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Jul 19, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: Use spin_lock_bh for hn_lock nvmet_tcp_state_change(), a socket callback that runs in BH context, can reach handshake_req_cancel() via nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and tls_handshake_cancel(). handshake_req_cancel() acquires hn->hn_lock with plain spin_lock(). If a process-context thread on the same CPU holds hn->hn_lock when a softirq invokes the cancel path, the lock attempt deadlocks. This is the only caller that invokes tls_handshake_cancel() from BH context; every other consumer calls it from process context. Deferring the cancel to process context in the NVMe target is not straightforward: nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() must call tls_handshake_cancel() atomically with its state transition to DISCONNECTING. If the cancel were deferred, the handshake completion callback could fire in the window before the cancel runs, observe the unexpected state, and return without dropping its kref on the queue. Reworking that interlock is considerably more invasive than hardening the handshake lock. Convert all hn->hn_lock acquisitions from spin_lock/spin_unlock to spin_lock_bh/spin_unlock_bh so the lock is never taken with softirqs enabled.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-63980 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in net/handshake: Use spin_lock_bh for hn_lock. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <06ab5978866fc2221b910347fd3e510ca8e7b1a4 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <0866569fc36a56f568acd3900d354e3505932e09 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <91898de9501a047ba67c6b864dcd403e00bdfbf5 || >=675b453e024154dd547921c6e6d5b58747ba7e0e <cc993e0927ec8bd98ea33377ada03295fcda0f24 | 06ab5978866fc2221b910347fd3e510ca8e7b1a4, 0866569fc36a56f568acd3900d354e3505932e09, 91898de9501a047ba67c6b864dcd403e00bdfbf5, cc993e0927ec8bd98ea33377ada03295fcda0f24 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.7 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Jul 19, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 5, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 5, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: Use spin_lock_bh for hn_lock nvmet_tcp_state_change(), a socket callback that runs in BH context, can reach handshake_req_cancel() via nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and tls_handshake_cancel(). handshake_req_cancel() acquires hn->hn_lock with plain spin_lock(). If a process-context thread on the same CPU holds hn->hn_lock when a softirq invokes the cancel path, the lock attempt deadlocks. This is the only caller that invokes tls_handshake_cancel() from BH context; every other consumer calls it from process context. Deferring the cancel to process context in the NVMe target is not straightforward: nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() must call tls_handshake_cancel() atomically with its state transition to DISCONNECTING. If the cancel were deferred, the handshake completion callback could fire in the window before the cancel runs, observe the unexpected state, and return without dropping its kref on the queue. Reworking that interlock is considerably more invasive than hardening the handshake lock. Convert all hn->hn_lock acquisitions from spin_lock/spin_unlock to spin_lock_bh/spin_unlock_bh so the lock is never taken with softirqs enabled.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.