HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 6654 use after free and double free in intoiterdrop
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.3CVE-2026-6654GHSA-XPHW-CQX3-667J

Use-After-Free and Double Free in IntoIter::drop When Element Drop PanicsCVE-2026-6654

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-6654 records a High severity (CVSS 7.3) vulnerability in Use-After-Free and Double Free in IntoIter::drop When Element Drop Panics. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps thin-vec (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Apr 14, 2026Updated Oct 12, 2026Source checked Oct 12, 2026First seen by HOL Jul 15, 2026Material review Oct 12, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Memory Corruption
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-415, CWE-416, CWE-1341
Source
NVD
Source checked
Oct 12, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps thin-vec (crates.io). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
thin-veccrates.io>=0.0.0-0 <0.2.160.2.16

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for thin-vec.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update thin-vec to 0.2.16 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Apr 14, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:osv:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Jul 15, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecrates.io
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referencerustsec.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
  • Source referencesecurity.access.redhat.com
Upstream source description

A Double Free / Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability has been identified in the `IntoIter::drop` and `ThinVec::clear` implementations of the `thin-vec` crate. Both vulnerabilities share the same root cause and can trigger memory corruption using only safe Rust code - no unsafe blocks required. Undefined Behavior has been confirmed via Miri and AddressSanitizer (ASAN). ## Details When a **panic occurs** during sequential element deallocation, the subsequent length cleanup code (`set_len(0)`) is never executed. During stack unwinding, the container is dropped again, causing already-freed memory to be re-freed (Double Free / UAF). ### Vulnerability 1 - `IntoIter::drop` `IntoIter::drop` transfers ownership of the internal buffer via `mem::replace`, then sequentially frees elements via `ptr::drop_in_place`. If a panic occurs during element deallocation, `set_len_non_singleton(0)` is never reached. During unwinding, `vec` is dropped again, re-freeing already-freed elements. The standard library's `std::vec::IntoIter` prevents this with a **DropGuard pattern**, but thin-vec lacks this defense. ### PoC ```rust use thin_vec::ThinVec; struct PanicBomb(String); impl Drop for PanicBomb { fn drop(&mut self) { if self.0 == "panic" { panic!("panic!"); } println!("Dropping: {}", self.0); } } fn main() { let mut v = ThinVec::new(); v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal1"))); v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("panic"))); // trigger element v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal2"))); let mut iter = v.into_iter(); iter.next(); // When iter is dropped: panic occurs at "panic" element // → During unwinding, Double Drop is triggered on "normal1" (already freed) } ``` ### Vulnerability 2 - `ThinVec::clear` `clear()` calls `ptr::drop_in_place(&mut self[..])` followed by `self.set_len(0)` to reset the length. If a panic occurs during element deallocation, `set_len(0)` is never executed. When the `ThinVec` itself is subsequently dropped, already-freed elements are freed again. ### PoC ```rust use thin_vec::ThinVec; use std::panic; struct Poison(Box<usize>, &'static str); impl Drop for Poison { fn drop(&mut self) { if self.1 == "panic" { panic!("panic!"); } println!("Dropping: {}", self.0); } } fn main() { let mut v = ThinVec::new(); v.push(Poison(Box::new(1), "normal1")); // index 0 v.push(Poison(Box::new(2), "panic")); // index 1 → panic triggered here v.push(Poison(Box::new(3), "normal2")); // index 2 let _ = panic::catch_unwind(panic::AssertUnwindSafe(|| { v.clear(); // panic occurs at "panic" element during clear() // → set_len(0) is never called // → already-freed elements are re-freed when v goes out of scope })); } ``` ## Prerequisites 1. `ThinVec` stores heap-owning types (`String`, `Vec`, `Box`, etc.) 2. (Vulnerability 1) An iterator is created via `into_iter()` and dropped before being fully consumed, or (Vulnerability 2) `clear()` is called while a remaining element's `Drop` implementation can panic 3. The `Drop` implementation of a remaining element triggers a panic When combined with `Box<dyn Trait> types`, an exploit primitive enabling Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE) via heap spray and vtable hijacking has been confirmed. If the freed fat pointer slot (16 bytes) at the point of Double Drop is reclaimed by an attacker-controlled fake vtable, subsequent Drop calls can be redirected to attacker-controlled code.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.