HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 66635 wordpress slider by 10web plugin 1263 cross site
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.4CVE-2026-66635

WordPress Slider by 10Web plugin <= 1.2.63 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilityCVE-2026-66635

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-66635 records a High severity (CVSS 7.4) vulnerability in WordPress Slider by 10Web plugin <= 1.2.63 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps 10Web/Slider by 10Web (generic), 10Web/slider-wd (generic), 10Web/slider-wd (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 18, 2026Updated Oct 6, 2026Source checked Oct 6, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 18, 2026Material review Oct 6, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps 10Web/Slider by 10Web (generic), 10Web/slider-wd (generic), 10Web/slider-wd (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
10Web/Slider by 10Webgenericn/aNot reported
10Web/slider-wdgeneric>=0 <=1.2.63Not reported
10Web/slider-wdgeneric>=n/a <=1.2.62Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for 10Web/Slider by 10Web, 10Web/slider-wd, 10Web/slider-wd.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Monitor this advisory for an available fix and review any installs of the affected package.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 18, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  2. Source modified

    Oct 6, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 18, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencepatchstack.com
Upstream source description

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Slider by 10Web slider-wd allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Slider by 10Web: from n/a through 1.2.63.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Denial-of-service vulnerability in ESET PROTECT On-PremSame generic ecosystem
  • HortusFox < 6.2 Remote Code Execution via Theme ImportSame generic ecosystem
  • SPIP Crayons Plugin < 3.5.0 Authorization Bypass RCESame generic ecosystem
  • MCP TypeScript SDK: OAuth client could send credentials to an authorization server chosen by the MCP serverSame generic ecosystem
  • Microsoft UFO: Authenticated Android shell command injection in Mobile MCP type_text and launch_appSame generic ecosystem
  • Microsoft UFO: Arbitrary file write in the Linux MCP `execute_command` toolSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
CSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-352
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 6, 2026
References
1 linked source
Open source record