HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 68582 vikunja link share token reads any tenants kanban
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Critical · CVSS 6.5CVE-2026-68582GHSA-RJ9J-8772-4H6C

Vikunja: Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA)CVE-2026-68582

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-68582 records a Critical severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in Vikunja: Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps code.vikunja.io/api (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 2, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026Source checked Oct 9, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 3, 2026Material review Oct 9, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-639, CWE-863
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 9, 2026
References
5 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Critical · CVSS 6.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps code.vikunja.io/api (go). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
code.vikunja.io/apigo>=0.24.0,<=2.3.02.4.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for code.vikunja.io/api.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update code.vikunja.io/api to 2.4.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 2, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 9, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 3, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevulncheck.com
Upstream source description

## Summary The task-collection endpoint `GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks` loads the requested project view straight from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a **link-share token**, the task query is correctly pinned to the share's own project, but the *view* is taken from the attacker-controlled path and never re-validated against the share. A holder of a share link to **any** project can therefore point the endpoint at any other tenant's kanban view and receive that view's bucket records — bucket titles plus the full `created_by` user object (username, name, id) — for every view in the instance. The same missing pre-authorization view load also yields a project/view-ID existence oracle (404 vs. non-404) usable by link shares and ordinary authenticated users alike. ## Details Root cause is in `TaskCollection.ReadAll` (`pkg/models/task_collection.go`). 1. The view is resolved from the URL params before any permission check: ```go // pkg/models/task_collection.go (ReadAll) if tf.ProjectViewID != 0 { view, err = GetProjectViewByIDAndProject(s, tf.ProjectViewID, tf.ProjectID) // (URL params) ... } ``` `GetProjectViewByIDAndProject` (`pkg/models/project_view.go`) filters only on `WHERE id = ? AND project_id = ?` — it performs no authorization. A valid `(project, view)` pair returns the view; an invalid pair returns `ErrProjectViewDoesNotExist` (HTTP 404). 2. For a link-share caller, the code pins the *task* scope to the token's own project but reuses the attacker-supplied `view`: ```go shareAuth, is := a.(*LinkSharing) if is { project, err := GetProjectSimpleByID(s, shareAuth.ProjectID) // token's project ... return getTaskOrTasksInBuckets(s, a, []*Project{project}, view, opts, filteringForBucket, tf.forceFlatTasks) // `view` is the foreign, attacker-controlled view — never validated against shareAuth.ProjectID } ``` 3. `getTaskOrTasksInBuckets` → `GetTasksInBucketsForView` (`pkg/models/kanban.go`) reads the buckets of that foreign view directly: ```go err = s.Where("project_view_id = ?", view.ID).OrderBy("position").Find(&buckets) ... users, err := getUsersOrLinkSharesFromIDs(s, userIDs) // resolves each bucket's created_by ``` Each returned `Bucket` serializes `CreatedBy *user.User` as `json:"created_by"` (`pkg/models/kanban.go`), exposing the creating user's username, name, and id. The normal (non-share) path is protected because it runs `getRelevantProjectsFromCollection`, which calls `project.CanRead` on the URL project and returns 403 before any bucket data is produced. Only the `LinkSharing` branch skips that gate, which is why the bucket disclosure is link-share-specific. `ReadAllWeb` (`pkg/web/handler/read_all.go`) performs no permission check of its own, so all authorization for this endpoint lives inside `ReadAll`. Scope of the leak (verified against fixtures): the *tasks* returned inside the buckets are still constrained to the share's own project (`getRawTasksForProjects` filters `tasks.project_id IN opts.projectIDs`, derived from the share's project). So victim task **contents do not leak**; what leaks is the foreign view's bucket structure and, critically, the `created_by` user identities of arbitrary buckets instance-wide. Introduced in v0.24.0 by the per-view kanban feature (`feat(views)!: return tasks in buckets by view`), which added the `views/{view}/tasks` endpoint and the foreign-view bucket load. The link-share branch predates it, but the two only combine into this bug from v0.24.0 onward. ## Impact A holder of a link-share token to any single project (link shares are designed to be handed out, often semi-publicly) can: - **Enumerate all project and view IDs instance-wide.** IDs are sequential auto-increment integers; an invalid `(project, view)` pair returns 404 while a valid one returns 200, giving a reliable existence oracle across all tenants. - **Disclose the `created_by` user of any kanban view's buckets** — username, display name, and user id. Because Vikunja auto-creates a default project with a Kanban view for every user, iterating view IDs enumerates usernames and user IDs for essentially every account on the instance. - **Disclose bucket titles** of every kanban view in the instance. This is a cross-tenant broken-object-level-authorization bypass. It does not disclose victim task contents through this path, but instance-wide username/user-id enumeration plus kanban structure disclosure is a meaningful PII and reconnaissance exposure that defeats the tenant isolation the permission model is meant to enforce. The ID-enumeration oracle additionally works for any ordinary authenticated user (invalid combo → 404 vs. inaccessible combo → 403), because the view is loaded before the `CanRead` check. ## Proof of Concept Prerequisites: link sharing enabled (default), a share link to any project (call it project A), and any second project B (e.g. another tenant's) with a kanban view V_B. 1. Authenticate the share link to obtain a share JWT: `POST /api/v1/shares/{shareHash}/auth` 2. Using that token, request a foreign kanban view's tasks: `GET /api/v1/projects/{B}/views/{V_B}/tasks` 3. The 200 response is a list of `Bucket` objects belonging to view `V_B` — each with `title` and a populated `created_by` (username, name, id) — even though the token has no relationship to project B. 4. Iterate `{B}`/`{V_B}` over sequential integers: valid pairs return bucket lists (harvest usernames/ids), invalid pairs return 404. Verified locally against the model fixtures: a `LinkSharing{ProjectID: 1}` (project 1 owned by user 1) calling `TaskCollection{ProjectID: 2, ProjectViewID: 8}.ReadAll` (project 2 owned by user 3) returns project 2's buckets (`"testbucket4 - other project"`, `"testbucket40"`) with their `created_by` user objects populated, and no error — while a nonexistent view id returns `ErrProjectViewDoesNotExist`. ## Recommended Fix In `TaskCollection.ReadAll`, before the view is loaded, pin the requested project to the link share's own project so any foreign view resolves to a 404 instead of leaking: ```go if shareAuth, is := a.(*LinkSharing); is { tf.ProjectID = shareAuth.ProjectID } ``` This is consistent with the existing behavior that already forces the task query to `shareAuth.ProjectID`, and it closes both the bucket disclosure and the share-token half of the enumeration oracle. As defence-in-depth, resolve the view's authorization against the authenticated caller for every auth type (not just link shares), so the endpoint never loads a view the caller cannot read — closing the 404-vs-403 existence oracle for ordinary users as well.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Vikunja: Scoped API token can mint unrestricted OAuth session credentialsSame code.vikunja.io/api package
  • Vikunja: OIDC email-fallback account linking ignores email_verified, enabling local-account takeoverSame code.vikunja.io/api package
  • Vikunja: Plaintext storage of password-reset/email-confirm tokens in database enables account takeover on DB read accessSame code.vikunja.io/api package
  • MariaDB: database privilege escalation via user / role name collision in the acl cacheAlso CWE-863
  • pacioli: A submit consent marker licensed cancellation of caller-named pre-existing documentsAlso CWE-863
  • Contao: Improper access control in the preview links moduleAlso CWE-639