Answer in brief
CVE-2026-69246 records a High severity (CVSS 7.2) vulnerability in Guzzle: Noncanonical host can bypass host-based checks. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps guzzlehttp/guzzle (composer), guzzlehttp/guzzle (composer), guzzlehttp/guzzle (packagist), guzzlehttp/guzzle (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 7.2. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps guzzlehttp/guzzle (composer), guzzlehttp/guzzle (composer), guzzlehttp/guzzle (packagist), guzzlehttp/guzzle (packagist). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| guzzlehttp/guzzlecomposer | <7.15.2 | 7.15.2 |
| guzzlehttp/guzzlecomposer | >=8.0.0,<8.0.1 | 8.0.1 |
| guzzlehttp/guzzlepackagist | >=0 <7.15.2 | 7.15.2 |
| guzzlehttp/guzzlepackagist | >=8.0.0 <8.0.1 | 8.0.1 |
Published upstream
Aug 3, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 10, 2026
Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 3, 2026
### Impact In affected versions, Guzzle gives a transport the request URI as text and supplies the `Host` header separately. The cURL handlers set `CURLOPT_URL` to the URI exactly as written and push that `Host` into `CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER`; `StreamHandler` does the same through `fopen()`. libcurl then parses the authority itself, percent-decoding it and, on an IDN-capable build, applying IDNA mapping, and uses the result to resolve, connect, name the TLS peer and address a proxy `CONNECT`, while the supplied `Host` suppresses the aligned one it would have generated. In `http://127.0.0.%31/` the URI host is one `filter_var()` rejects as an IP literal, yet libcurl decodes it to `127.0.0.1` and reaches loopback with no DNS lookup while the server receives `Host: 127.0.0.%31`. An attacker who influences a fetched URI can therefore reach a host the application's checks excluded and read whatever it exposes of the response. The same divergence moves Guzzle's own decisions onto a spelling the transport does not use: `no_proxy` selects proxy routing from the literal host, and `RedirectMiddleware` decides from it whether to strip `Authorization` and `Cookie`. The cookie middleware extracts `Set-Cookie` against the URI Guzzle produced, not the authority contacted, so for a raw divergent URI the cookie is stored under the URI host as written. Where Guzzle rewrote that URI but left a divergent `Host`, or where the caller supplied one, the cookie is stored under the canonical name and replayed by ordinary later requests to it. With a third-party `UriInterface`, a host of `[email protected]` reaches `127.0.0.1` through all three handlers and generates `Authorization: Basic` from userinfo the application never wrote. Exploitation requires the application to build a request URI from untrusted input and to make a host decision before handing it to Guzzle. Applications that only fetch URIs they construct themselves are not affected, and an exact allowlist of canonical names ordinarily fails closed; the exposure is to denylists, private-range and IP-literal checks, and any check that treats an unresolvable name as safe. The raw Unicode class needs an IDNA transformation somewhere: either a libcurl built with IDN support or Guzzle's own `idn_conversion`, off by default on both branches, which rewrites the URI in `Client::buildUri()` before a handler sees it and leaves a prebuilt request's explicit `Host` as written, while a request the client builds derives that header from the rewritten URI and produces no divergence. Noncanonical numeric spellings such as `127.1`, `2130706433`, `0x7f000001` and `0177.0.0.1` remain accepted after the patch and reach whatever the transport reads them as, loopback or a routable public host, and the cURL and stream handlers can differ, so a check comparing a host against an address as text stays bypassable. Guzzle does not offer SSRF protection, and neither cache poisoning nor cross-tenant compromise was established. ### Patches This is a summary; the patches are the authority. The issue is fixed in `7.15.2` and `8.0.1`, which validate the request host in all three built-in handlers before any network I/O. A URI host is rejected for a byte outside `0x21` to `0x7E`, a percent escape, a URI authority delimiter, unbalanced brackets, or numeric-looking parts followed by a trailing dot. That last rule is deliberately conservative and also refuses out-of-range forms libcurl keeps as names, such as `256.0.0.1.`. An explicit `Host` header must be printable ASCII, and on `7.15.2` free of percent escapes. The client also regenerates a derived `Host` when it rewrites the request URI. Versions before `7.15.2` and version `8.0.0` are affected. ### Workarounds If you cannot upgrade, constrain the host yourself before handing a URI to Guzzle, and constrain any explicit `Host` header separately, on every redirect hop. The URI rule assumes `$uri` is a validated `GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Uri`, so re-parse a third-party `UriInterface` with `new Uri((string) $uri)` first. ```php $host = $uri->getHost(); if ( preg_match('/\A[\x21-\x7E]*\z/D', $host) !== 1 || strpbrk($host, '%@/?#\\') !== false || substr($host, -1) === '.' ) { throw new RuntimeException('Refusing to fetch this URI host.'); } if ( preg_match('/\A[\x21-\x7E]*\z/D', $hostHeader) !== 1 || strpos($hostHeader, '%') !== false ) { throw new RuntimeException('Refusing to send this Host header.'); } ``` It differs from the patch in both directions: it refuses `example.com.`, which the patch accepts, and it does not canonicalize `127.1` or `0x7f000001`. Reparsing the URI separates a valid port from the host and rejects malformed bracket forms, so the snippet checks the host component alone. `idn_conversion => true` is not an access control, since IDNA maps `127。0。0。1` onto `127.0.0.1` and direct handler use bypasses it, and `Uri::getHost()` is not an SSRF boundary: it is the host as written, not the host a transport connects to. Where the destination matters, resolve the host and check the addresses, and use a separate cookie jar for untrusted origins.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.