Answer in brief
CVE-2026-69247 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) security vulnerability in cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing. The source record does not mark it as known exploited. 1 affected package is mapped in the feed.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-69247 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) security vulnerability in cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing. The source record does not mark it as known exploited. 1 affected package is mapped in the feed.
Update cryptography to 50.0.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanVulnerability describes the vulnerability class recorded for this advisory. The current record does not mark CVE-2026-69247 as known exploited; continue to monitor the source for status changes. The feed includes package mappings that can be checked against lockfiles and deployed manifests.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| cryptographypip | >=44.0.0,<50.0.0 | 50.0.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
CVE-2026-69247 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) security vulnerability in cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing. The source record does not mark it as known exploited. 1 affected package is mapped in the feed.
The source record does not mark it as known exploited.
Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for cryptography.
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL GuardUpdate cryptography to 50.0.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.
Local check
hol-guard supply-chain scanVulnerability describes the vulnerability class recorded for this advisory. The current record does not mark CVE-2026-69247 as known exploited; continue to monitor the source for status changes. The feed includes package mappings that can be checked against lockfiles and deployed manifests.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| cryptographypip | >=44.0.0,<50.0.0 | 50.0.0 |
Fixed versions are reported by the source feed; confirm compatibility before updating.
Reported by GitHub Security Advisories (ghsa).
CVE-2026-69247 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) security vulnerability in cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing. The source record does not mark it as known exploited. 1 affected package is mapped in the feed.
The source record does not mark it as known exploited.
Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for cryptography.
HOL Guard can help your team review package activity against supported protection paths.
Explore HOL Guard### Summary `pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the outcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`'s `encryptedKey` in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key. Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0. ### Details Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` → build an AES cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation: 1. invalid RSA padding → `Decryption failed` 2. valid padding, bad key length → `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N` 3. correct length, wrong key → `Invalid padding bytes.` 4. the real key → plaintext Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels, invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming ciphertexts. Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData` matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter. ### Fix Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now resolved before the private key is used, so the expected key length is known in advance. If the RSA decryption fails or recovers a key of the wrong length, a random key of the expected length is substituted and decryption continues down an identical path. All failures now report identically and perform the same work. ### Not addressed by this fix `EnvelopedData` does not authenticate its content. Tampering with `encryptedContent` alone yields a CBC padding oracle that recovers plaintext at roughly 256 queries per byte, without recovering any key, on every backend. This is a property of PKCS#7 rather than of this implementation, cannot be fixed in the library, and is now documented. ### Credit Reported by @X1AOxiang.
### Summary `pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the outcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`'s `encryptedKey` in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key. Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0. ### Details Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` → build an AES cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation: 1. invalid RSA padding → `Decryption failed` 2. valid padding, bad key length → `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N` 3. correct length, wrong key → `Invalid padding bytes.` 4. the real key → plaintext Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels, invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming ciphertexts. Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData` matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter. ### Fix Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now resolved before the private key is used, so the expected key length is known in advance. If the RSA decryption fails or recovers a key of the wrong length, a random key of the expected length is substituted and decryption continues down an identical path. All failures now report identically and perform the same work. ### Not addressed by this fix `EnvelopedData` does not authenticate its content. Tampering with `encryptedContent` alone yields a CBC padding oracle that recovers plaintext at roughly 256 queries per byte, without recovering any key, on every backend. This is a property of PKCS#7 rather than of this implementation, cannot be fixed in the library, and is now documented. ### Credit Reported by @X1AOxiang.