Answer in brief
CVE-2026-72159 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in ocfs2: reject non-inline dinodes with i_size and zero i_clusters. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
Answer in brief
CVE-2026-72159 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in ocfs2: reject non-inline dinodes with i_size and zero i_clusters. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <416d3e5f8a30ed04fe21ba7dc73c2841c3b56265 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <ed0f938f946f16b772e99cb8c277ab57828e5be4 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <83f6756a7b71adec0a41ae68e079a38906d59c6c || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <38c1ef7ce50eb4af0f89038b8aba12396ddb9233 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <d837068eefbc2651fe5789bf75a0f945710f7b8e || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <2174c68f623b74bd8690a4a6a4a52882d8ac3dc3 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <3bfeb436d4be6a2beb56cab344770e93e6b07260 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <7ebc672fab7a76e1e47e0f2fc1ee48118d27fde4 | 416d3e5f8a30ed04fe21ba7dc73c2841c3b56265, ed0f938f946f16b772e99cb8c277ab57828e5be4, 83f6756a7b71adec0a41ae68e079a38906d59c6c, 38c1ef7ce50eb4af0f89038b8aba12396ddb9233, d837068eefbc2651fe5789bf75a0f945710f7b8e, 2174c68f623b74bd8690a4a6a4a52882d8ac3dc3, 3bfeb436d4be6a2beb56cab344770e93e6b07260, 7ebc672fab7a76e1e47e0f2fc1ee48118d27fde4 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 2.6.29 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 15, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 15, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 15, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reject non-inline dinodes with i_size and zero i_clusters On a volume mounted without OCFS2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SPARSE_ALLOC, a non-inline regular file with non-zero i_size and zero i_clusters is structurally malformed: the extent map declares no allocated clusters yet the size header claims content exists. Keep rejecting that shape, but express it through a shared predicate so the same invariant is available to normal inode reads and online filecheck. The same zero-cluster shape is also malformed for non-inline directories. ocfs2 directory growth allocates backing storage before advancing i_size, and ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el() later walks until ctx->pos reaches i_size_read(inode). A forged directory dinode with a huge i_size and no clusters would repeatedly fail on holes while advancing through the claimed size. Sparse regular files remain exempt: on sparse-alloc volumes, truncate can legitimately grow i_size without allocating clusters. System inodes and inline-data dinodes also retain their separate storage rules. Mirror the check in ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block() as well. filecheck reports through its own error namespace, so malformed size/cluster state is logged as a filecheck invalid-inode result rather than via ocfs2_error(), but it must not proceed into ocfs2_populate_inode().
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <416d3e5f8a30ed04fe21ba7dc73c2841c3b56265 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <ed0f938f946f16b772e99cb8c277ab57828e5be4 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <83f6756a7b71adec0a41ae68e079a38906d59c6c || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <38c1ef7ce50eb4af0f89038b8aba12396ddb9233 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <d837068eefbc2651fe5789bf75a0f945710f7b8e || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <2174c68f623b74bd8690a4a6a4a52882d8ac3dc3 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <3bfeb436d4be6a2beb56cab344770e93e6b07260 || >=b657c95c11088d77fc1bfc9c84d940f778bf9d12 <7ebc672fab7a76e1e47e0f2fc1ee48118d27fde4 | 416d3e5f8a30ed04fe21ba7dc73c2841c3b56265, ed0f938f946f16b772e99cb8c277ab57828e5be4, 83f6756a7b71adec0a41ae68e079a38906d59c6c, 38c1ef7ce50eb4af0f89038b8aba12396ddb9233, d837068eefbc2651fe5789bf75a0f945710f7b8e, 2174c68f623b74bd8690a4a6a4a52882d8ac3dc3, 3bfeb436d4be6a2beb56cab344770e93e6b07260, 7ebc672fab7a76e1e47e0f2fc1ee48118d27fde4 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 2.6.29 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 15, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 15, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 15, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: reject non-inline dinodes with i_size and zero i_clusters On a volume mounted without OCFS2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SPARSE_ALLOC, a non-inline regular file with non-zero i_size and zero i_clusters is structurally malformed: the extent map declares no allocated clusters yet the size header claims content exists. Keep rejecting that shape, but express it through a shared predicate so the same invariant is available to normal inode reads and online filecheck. The same zero-cluster shape is also malformed for non-inline directories. ocfs2 directory growth allocates backing storage before advancing i_size, and ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el() later walks until ctx->pos reaches i_size_read(inode). A forged directory dinode with a huge i_size and no clusters would repeatedly fail on holes while advancing through the claimed size. Sparse regular files remain exempt: on sparse-alloc volumes, truncate can legitimately grow i_size without allocating clusters. System inodes and inline-data dinodes also retain their separate storage rules. Mirror the check in ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block() as well. filecheck reports through its own error namespace, so malformed size/cluster state is logged as a filecheck invalid-inode result rather than via ocfs2_error(), but it must not proceed into ocfs2_populate_inode().
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.