Answer in brief
CVE-2026-72372 records a High severity (CVSS 7.8) vulnerability in afs: Fix lack of locking around modifications of net->cells_dyn_ino. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 7.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=537b0105952578531f748c7fb3ce36ae9a514784 <4d8a2fe8847859f4fa4e9a2fa1221c9c1158e66b || >=1d0b929fc070b4115403a0a6206a0c6a62dd61f5 <2ffb70a8a01988046bb207b7d0af9358a8337378 || >=1d0b929fc070b4115403a0a6206a0c6a62dd61f5 <e94f92fd56c553a8bf9421c3289e1b85c7c08857 || >=1d0b929fc070b4115403a0a6206a0c6a62dd61f5 <55e841836c6f4646490f7b0347192b7a92d431ba || >=6.12.97 <6.12.101 | 4d8a2fe8847859f4fa4e9a2fa1221c9c1158e66b, 2ffb70a8a01988046bb207b7d0af9358a8337378, e94f92fd56c553a8bf9421c3289e1b85c7c08857, 55e841836c6f4646490f7b0347192b7a92d431ba, 6.12.101 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.15 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 15, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 15, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix lack of locking around modifications of net->cells_dyn_ino Fix the lack of locking around modifications of net->cells_dyn_ino by taking net->cells_lock exclusively. This also requires to cell to be removed from net->cells_dyn_ino in afs_destroy_cell_work() rather than in afs_cell_destroy() as the latter runs in RCU cleanup context and sleeping locks cannot be taken there.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.