HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 74607 kvm svm serialize accesses to the owner and
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.8CVE-2026-74607

KVM: SVM: Serialize accesses to the owner and mirror list with separate lockCVE-2026-74607

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-74607 records a High severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in KVM: SVM: Serialize accesses to the owner and mirror list with separate lock. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 22, 2026Updated Aug 25, 2026Source checked Oct 7, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 22, 2026Material review Aug 25, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 7, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <47976eaaf0a4eb46dade48b3246779090db9e3ec || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <d728baba0f20e49439fc7831bf3e4e7dee82161a || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <1d78d33275ef2a16c6d080910b291d0a97a0e61347976eaaf0a4eb46dade48b3246779090db9e3ec, d728baba0f20e49439fc7831bf3e4e7dee82161a, 1d78d33275ef2a16c6d080910b291d0a97a0e613
Linux/Linuxgeneric5.18Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <7943ec3a6d0e7e0a2eb4943300bce089ac3e8c3e || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <28afde1edbd8b20058cbf4d75fb57876471ec334 || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <328ab4fabe05af004d886659f8744076e320ddce || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <47976eaaf0a4eb46dade48b3246779090db9e3ec || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <d728baba0f20e49439fc7831bf3e4e7dee82161a || >=b2125513dfc0dd0ec5a9605138a3c356592cfb73 <1d78d33275ef2a16c6d080910b291d0a97a0e6137943ec3a6d0e7e0a2eb4943300bce089ac3e8c3e, 28afde1edbd8b20058cbf4d75fb57876471ec334, 328ab4fabe05af004d886659f8744076e320ddce, 47976eaaf0a4eb46dade48b3246779090db9e3ec, d728baba0f20e49439fc7831bf3e4e7dee82161a, 1d78d33275ef2a16c6d080910b291d0a97a0e613

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 47976eaaf0a4eb46dade48b3246779090db9e3ec; Linux/Linux to 7943ec3a6d0e7e0a2eb4943300bce089ac3e8c3e if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 22, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 22, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Serialize accesses to the owner and mirror list with separate lock Interaction between KVM_CAP_VM_MOVE_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM and KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM can cause two separate issues: - in sev_migrate_from(), when the destination KVM is a mirror, the mirror entry is moved from the source's list to the owner's mirror_vms list, without holding the owner's lock unlike other writers of the owner's mirror list (sev_vm_copy_enc_context_from(), sev_vm_destroy()). A concurrent COPY or destroy can race with sev_migrate_from() and corrupt the list. - In sev_vm_destroy(), the *owner* is still active and could receive concurrently a KVM_CAP_VM_MOVE_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM that causes sev->enc_context_owner to change. In this case the incorrect VM receives kvm_put_kvm(). The second issue needs particular care because the owner could disappear altogether (even though the race window is impossibly small) between reading it and locking it. There is thus no way to perform the checks under the owner lock without putting struct kvm under SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU (which would allow kvm_get_kvm_safe() under RCU critical section). It is much simpler to just use a global lock, since the critical sections are so small and the new lock is always a leaf lock.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Gitea OAuth2 refresh token grant accepts access tokensSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem