HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 74653 serial 8250of clear stuck empty fifo rx timeout
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-74653

serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xxCVE-2026-74653

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-74653 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xx. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 22, 2026Updated Aug 27, 2026Source checked Oct 7, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 22, 2026Material review Aug 27, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea || >=0 <6.18.45 || >=0 <7.1.93ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6, 7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38, 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea, 6.18.45, 7.1.9
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6 || >=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38 || >=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6, 7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38, 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea
Linux/Linuxgeneric2.6.36Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <c321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3 || >=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6 || >=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38 || >=e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7 <1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0eac321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3, 3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6, 7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38, 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6; Linux/Linux to 3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6; Linux/Linux to c321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 22, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 27, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 22, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xx The NXP LPC32xx UART (PORT_LPC3220) can latch an RX character-timeout interrupt while the RX FIFO is empty: IIR reports UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT (0x0c) but LSR.DR is clear. A character timeout is only cleared by reading RHR, but serial8250_rx_chars() reads RHR only when LSR.DR is set, so nothing ever clears the condition. The interrupt is level-triggered and re-fires immediately, so on a single-core ARM926 the resulting interrupt storm livelocks the CPU. It is reproducible when userspace repeatedly opens the front-panel port (ttyS1): serial8250_do_set_termios() re-enables interrupts on unlock and the handler then spins forever with iir=0xcc lsr=0x60 ier=0x05, tripping the soft-lockup detector in serial8250_handle_irq_locked(). LPC32xx has no dedicated 8250 glue driver, it's driven by the generic 8250_of. Add a hardware specific handle_irq for PORT_LPC3220, wired up in of_platform_serial_setup() the same way fsl8250_handle_irq is installed. The handler follows dw8250_handle_irq(): on an RX timeout with an empty FIFO (LSR.DR and LSR.BI clear) it does one throwaway RHR read to clear the condition, then calls serial8250_handle_irq_locked(). No real received data is ever discarded, and it is a no-op on healthy UARTs which never report a timeout with DR clear. This is the same class of bug already worked around in other 8250 drivers; see commit 424d79183af0 ("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid "too much work" from bogus rx timeout interrupt") which reports the identical iir=0xcc/lsr=0x60. See also UART_RX_TIMEOUT_QUIRK in 8250_omap, and the note in 8250_bcm7271.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Gitea OAuth2 refresh token grant accepts access tokensSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem
  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilitiesSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 7, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record