Answer in brief
CVE-2026-74714 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <cc0295f89296ed351fc4b0b48fee887ba02c5d24 || >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <ddbe966b5d1fe212ada749bc3d0b410f1a7dea74 || >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <7d2b60a4bc0499f62ff8520af6309bbe170882fd || >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <cefcbbe20846a45f9a7dae868f7ef1000953e2df || >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <97e74d3e45d653c07c2d406fc530a9bbe3df8396 || >=04c7820b776f1c4b48698574c47de9e940d368e8 <e5fd3f514e27db1f05fbd72ba615d74941e23c51 | cc0295f89296ed351fc4b0b48fee887ba02c5d24, ddbe966b5d1fe212ada749bc3d0b410f1a7dea74, 7d2b60a4bc0499f62ff8520af6309bbe170882fd, cefcbbe20846a45f9a7dae868f7ef1000953e2df, 97e74d3e45d653c07c2d406fc530a9bbe3df8396, e5fd3f514e27db1f05fbd72ba615d74941e23c51 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 5.15 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Aug 22, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Aug 22, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Aug 22, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: tcp: Fix use-after-free in bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() reqsk_queue_hash_req() publishes a TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV request_sock onto the ehash chain, drops the bucket lock, and only afterwards sets rsk_refcnt to 3. Lockless readers such as __inet_lookup_established() handle this with refcount_inc_not_zero(), but bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() uses plain sock_hold() while holding the bucket lock, on the assumption that the lock guarantees sk_refcnt > 0. That assumption does not hold for request_sock: CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- tcp_conn_request() reqsk_queue_hash_req() inet_ehash_insert(req) spin_lock(bucket) __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(req) // rsk_refcnt == 0 spin_unlock(bucket) bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch() spin_lock(bucket) sock_hold(req) <-- addition on 0 spin_unlock(bucket) refcount_set(&req->rsk_refcnt, 3) // clobbers saturated value which surfaces as: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25 at refcount_warn_saturate+0x48/0x90, CPU#1 Call Trace: bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch+0x14e/0x170 bpf_iter_tcp_batch+0x53/0x200 bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next+0x27/0x70 bpf_seq_read+0x107/0x410 vfs_read+0xb9/0x380 The iterator's stolen reference is lost when the publishing CPU's refcount_set() overwrites the count, leaving the socket one reference short. When the last legitimate owner drops its reference the reqsk is freed while still reachable, leading to use-after-free. This reproduces in seconds with tcp_syncookies=0, a handful of threads doing connect()/close() to a local listener while others read an iter/tcp link in a tight loop. Use refcount_inc_not_zero() and skip the socket on failure. A skipped socket is still part of the bucket, so keep counting it in expected. The reallocations are sized from expected, and a request sock whose refcount gets published while the lock is held across the last realloc must already have room. A skipped socket is counted in expected but never batched, so end_sk can be short of expected on a batch that is actually complete. Decide completeness by whether the walk left any socket behind instead. The WARN after the locked realloc checks the same, replacing an end_sk == expected check that could not hold on that path since commit cdec67a489d4 ("bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"). If every matching socket in a bucket is mid-init (refcount 0), end_sk stays 0. Advance to the next bucket rather than returning a batch entry that was never filled this round.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.