HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 75538 a signed length overflow in erlangotps inet tcp
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.2CVE-2026-75538

A Signed Length Overflow in Erlang/OTP's inet TCP Driver Overflows the Receive Buffer Into BEAM VM Memory From an Unauthenticated PeerCVE-2026-75538

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-75538 records a High severity (CVSS 8.2) vulnerability in A Signed Length Overflow in Erlang/OTP's inet TCP Driver Overflows the Receive Buffer Into BEAM VM Memory From an Unauthenticated Peer. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Erlang/erlang/otp (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 1, 2026Updated Sep 8, 2026Source checked Oct 16, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 1, 2026Material review Sep 8, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.2
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.2. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Erlang/erlang/otp (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic), Erlang/OTP (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Erlang/erlang/otpgeneric>=84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 <08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b
Erlang/OTPgeneric>=84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 <08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b
Erlang/OTPgeneric>=17.0 <27.3.4.17 || >=28.0 <28.5.0.6 || >=29.0 <29.0.627.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, 29.0.6
Erlang/OTPgeneric>=6.0 <15.2.7.13 || >=16.0 <16.4.0.6 || >=17.0 <17.0.615.2.7.13, 16.4.0.6, 17.0.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Erlang/erlang/otp, Erlang/OTP, Erlang/OTP.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Erlang/erlang/otp to 08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b; Erlang/OTP to 08e8efdba8500d2d6f54c6b1de1492b228017c9b; Erlang/OTP to 27.3.4.17; Erlang/OTP to 15.2.7.13 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 8, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 1, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecna.erlef.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referenceosv.dev
Upstream source description

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • JavaCV: Integer Overflow in IPCameraFrameGrabber Causes Infinite-Loop DoSAlso CWE-190
  • Gimp: gimp: paa integer overflow out-of-bounds readAlso CWE-190
  • Gimp: gimp: file-pvr plug-in pvr file parsing integer overflow heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilityAlso CWE-190
  • ZoneMinder: Authenticated OS Command Injection (RCE) via Export FeatureSame generic ecosystem
  • ZoneMinder: Authenticated OS Command Injection via unsanitized Monitor Name in event export (download_functions.php)Same generic ecosystem
  • IBM i is Affected By An Improper Privilege Management VulnerabilitySame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
RCE
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-190, CWE-122
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 16, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record