HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 76894 ckan mcp server datastore table ui resource does
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Low · CVSS 3.1CVE-2026-76894GHSA-VQFF-R82H-9CRC

ckan-mcp-server: DataStore Table UI resource does not validate postMessage origin (in) and posts to targetOrigin "*" (out)CVE-2026-76894

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-76894 records a Low severity (CVSS 3.1) vulnerability in ckan-mcp-server: DataStore Table UI resource does not validate postMessage origin (in) and posts to targetOrigin "*" (out). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 16, 2026Updated Oct 16, 2026Source checked Oct 16, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 16, 2026Material review Oct 16, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 3.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server (npm). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
@aborruso/ckan-mcp-servernpm<0.4.1120.4.112

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server to 0.4.112 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 16, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 16, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 16, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

## Summary The MCP Apps UI resource (an interactive DataStore table rendered in the host's webview/iframe) communicates with its parent via `postMessage`. Its inbound `message` listener performs no `event.origin` validation, and its outbound messages are sent with target origin `'*'`. Any window/frame able to reach the document can inject data into the table and interfere with the MCP UI handshake, and the UI's own JSON-RPC messages are broadcast without an origin restriction. ## Affected code `src/resources/datastore-table-ui.ts` (inline HTML): ```js window.addEventListener('message', function (event) { var msg = event.data; // no check of event.origin if (!msg || typeof msg !== 'object') return; if (msg.id !== undefined && _pending[msg.id]) { ... resolve/reject pending MCP request ... } ... if (data && (data.fields || data.records)) initTable(data); // renders attacker-supplied data }); // outbound: window.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc: '2.0', id: id, method: method, params: params || {} }, '*'); mcpNot: window.parent.postMessage({ jsonrpc:'2.0', method:method, params:params||{} }, '*'); ``` There is no allowlist of accepted origins for inbound messages and no fixed target origin for outbound messages. ## Impact - **Content spoofing.** A frame that can `postMessage` to the UI can supply arbitrary `fields`/`records`, causing the table to render fabricated rows and links (e.g. a phishing `__link_url`) that appear to come from the queried portal. (Values are HTML-escaped, so this is display spoofing, not script injection — no XSS.) - **Handshake/UX interference.** Because inbound messages matching a pending `id` resolve/reject the UI's MCP requests, an attacker frame can spoof responses to the `ui/initialize` handshake or otherwise disrupt the panel. - **Outbound leakage.** Posting to `'*'` means the UI's JSON-RPC messages are delivered to whatever the parent origin is; if the resource is ever embedded by a context other than the trusted host, those messages leak to it. Exploitability depends on the host embedding model (in a correct MCP Apps host the parent is the trusted host, which limits who can message the frame), so this is a hardening / defense-in-depth issue rather than a directly remotely-triggerable one — hence Low. ## Proof of concept - `poc/verify-no-origin-check.mjs` — static confirmation that the listener has no origin check and outbound uses `'*'`: ``` [x] validates event.origin : NO [x] outgoing postMessage targetOrigin : '*' (any) RESULT: VULNERABLE ``` - `poc/parent-spoof-poc.html` — a page that embeds the UI and injects fabricated rows cross-origin with no handshake; the UI renders them. ## Remediation - Validate `event.origin` against the expected host origin on every inbound message; drop messages from other origins. - Send outbound `postMessage` with an explicit target origin (the host origin established at initialize time) instead of `'*'`. - Optionally, bind to a nonce/channel established during `ui/initialize` so only the negotiated host can drive the panel.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Tool Poisoning
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-345, CWE-940
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 16, 2026
References
2 linked sources
Open source record