HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 7700 langflow prompt injection in langflow smart
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.8CVE-2026-7700GHSA-9FPM-3445-2VX4

Langflow: Prompt injection in Langflow Smart Transform can lead to code executionCVE-2026-7700

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-7700 records a High severity (CVSS 8.8) vulnerability in Langflow: Prompt injection in Langflow Smart Transform can lead to code execution. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps langflow (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 5, 2026Updated Oct 5, 2026Source checked Oct 6, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 5, 2026Material review Oct 5, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
1 mapped package or product
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps langflow (pip). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
langflowpip>=1.3.0,<1.10.31.10.3

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for langflow.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update langflow to 1.10.3 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 5, 2026

    Evidence: source:ghsa:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 5, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • NVD vulnerability recordnvd.nist.gov
  • Source referencevuldb.com
  • Source referencevuldb.com
  • Source referenceyuque.com
Upstream source description

## Summary Langflow versions 1.3.0 through 1.10.2 contain a code-injection vulnerability in the Smart Transform (`LambdaFilterComponent`) component. Smart Transform places flow-author instructions and a preview of its input data into a prompt asking an LLM to generate a Python lambda. It then extracts a one-line lambda from the model response, applies only syntactic format checks, evaluates it with Python's full builtins, and invokes the resulting function inside the Langflow process. A malicious flow author can exploit this directly through the Instructions field. In deployments where an exposed flow passes attacker-controlled content into Smart Transform, an attacker may also exploit it indirectly through prompt injection, subject to the configured model following the injected instruction. ## Vulnerability details **Vulnerable Code Location**: `src/lfx/src/lfx/components/llm_operations/lambda_filter.py` (line 242 in v1.10.2) ```python def _validate_lambda(self, lambda_text: str) -> bool: """Validate the provided lambda function text.""" return lambda_text.strip().startswith("lambda") and ":" in lambda_text # ... return eval(lambda_text) # noqa: S307 ``` For example, an attacker can attempt to make the model return: `lambda x: __import__("os").system("id")` This expression satisfies the vulnerable format checks. `eval()` creates the lambda with access to Python's default builtins, and the subsequent `fn(data)` invocation (in `_execute_lambda`) executes the command. Successful exploitation allows code execution with the privileges of the Langflow service process. This can expose or modify credentials, files, application data, and network resources accessible to that process, and may affect other tenants in shared deployments. ## PoC https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13c48fe1-7225-4e0d-9687-2d2df1e87f0e ## Fix The reported path was addressed by validating the generated code's AST and evaluating it with a restricted builtins mapping. The mainline fix is in PR #13530 (`1641b28f`) and shipped in Langflow 1.11.0. The 1.10.3 backport is in PR #14071 (`94859df3`). Users should upgrade to Langflow 1.10.3 or later. ## Workarounds Until an upgrade is possible: - Remove Smart Transform from runnable flows. - Restrict flow creation, editing, and execution to trusted users. - Do not route untrusted or externally controlled data through Smart Transform. - Limit the Langflow process's filesystem, network, and credential access. ## Credit - **Peyton Kennedy ([p80n-sec](https://github.com/p80n-sec)) of Endor Labs** — reporter (original finder) - **[SZXSec](https://github.com/SZXSec)** — reporter (duplicate report) - **[cyjhhh](https://github.com/cyjhhh)** — reporter (duplicate report) - **[0gur1](https://github.com/0gur1)** — reporter (duplicate report) - **[ajm4n](https://github.com/ajm4n)** — reporter (duplicate report, Finding 1 of a multi-finding submission) - **[andifilhohub](https://github.com/andifilhohub)** — analyst - **Jordan Frazier ([jordanrfrazier](https://github.com/jordanrfrazier))** — remediation developer

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Immich: Authenticated SVG upload reaches ImageMagick coders and enables RCEAlso CWE-94
  • Docling: `enable_local_fetch` is not enforced in HTML browser-rendering modeSame pip ecosystem
  • Docling: Arbitrary local file read via draw:image xlink:href in the OpenDocument backendSame pip ecosystem
  • vLLM: Harmony tool continuations drop `cache_salt` — restoring a cross-tenant prefix-cache membership oracleSame pip ecosystem
  • vLLM: Mirrored multimodal IPC caches desync after a rejected request — a later request reusing the same media hash trips a receiver assertion in the engine coreSame pip ecosystem
  • vLLM: Scale-out disaggregated multimodal transport trusts caller-supplied featuresSame pip ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
RCE
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-94
Source
GitHub Security Advisories
Source checked
Oct 6, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record