HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 77950 rpc error handler fails open in ashtypescript
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.3CVE-2026-77950

RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errorsCVE-2026-77950

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-77950 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.3) vulnerability in RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps ash-project/ash-project/ash_typescript (generic), ash-project/ash_typescript (generic), ash-project/ash_typescript (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 1, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026Source checked Oct 16, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 1, 2026Material review Sep 1, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.3
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.3. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps ash-project/ash-project/ash_typescript (generic), ash-project/ash_typescript (generic), ash-project/ash_typescript (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
ash-project/ash-project/ash_typescriptgeneric>=cb01cc8749e5a2a17fb45aedbe75df30a9f1126e <59d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f459d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f4
ash-project/ash_typescriptgeneric>=cb01cc8749e5a2a17fb45aedbe75df30a9f1126e <59d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f459d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f4
ash-project/ash_typescriptgeneric>=0.8.0 <0.18.00.18.0

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for ash-project/ash-project/ash_typescript, ash-project/ash_typescript, ash-project/ash_typescript.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update ash-project/ash-project/ash_typescript to 59d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f4; ash-project/ash_typescript to 59d8e985a98cf2e01794dbe5b919b897a95311f4; ash-project/ash_typescript to 0.18.0 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Sep 1, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 1, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencecna.erlef.org
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • Source referenceosv.dev
Upstream source description

Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to receive unredacted internal error data by provoking an error shape the configured error handler does not match. apply_error_handler/3 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/errors.ex is the only hook an application has for redacting or suppressing errors before they reach the client, with a nil return dropping the error entirely. Its rescue clause logs a warning and then returns the original, pre-handler error map. Error handlers are conventionally written as pattern-matching functions over expected error shapes, so an unmatched shape raises FunctionClauseError and the raw transformed error, including any secrets carried in vars, is emitted instead. An intent to suppress an error becomes an intent to publish it. The rescue catches exceptions only, so a handler that throws or exits still propagates. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.8.0 before 0.18.0.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • FiboSearch <= 1.34.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'purchased_plan' ParameterSame generic ecosystem
  • Social Share Buttons <= 1.30 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'share_url' Network SettingSame generic ecosystem
  • Cifs-utils: mount.cifs credential-file option injection allows local privilege boundary bypassSame generic ecosystem
  • Sunshine Photo Cart <= 3.7.4 - Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection via 'key' ParameterSame generic ecosystem
  • WP Compress <= 7.25.00 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation to 'group'/'setting'/'value' Parameters on comms EndpointSame generic ecosystem
  • HUSKY <= 1.4.5 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Exposure in 'woof_tm_data' Localized ScriptSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Missing Auth
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-209
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 16, 2026
References
4 linked sources
Open source record