HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 79717 galaxyng galaxyng blind ssrf via namespace
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium ยท CVSS 6.4CVE-2026-79717

Galaxy_ng: galaxy_ng: blind ssrf via namespace avatar_url with no private-address restrictionCVE-2026-79717

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-79717 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.4) vulnerability in Galaxy_ng: galaxy_ng: blind ssrf via namespace avatar_url with no private-address restriction. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 25, 2026Updated Aug 28, 2026Source checked Oct 9, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 25, 2026Material review Aug 28, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium ยท CVSS 6.4
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
8 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Not reported

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.4. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9 (generic), Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9 (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8generic*Not reported
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8generic*Not reported
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9generic*Not reported
Red Hat/python3.11-galaxy-nggeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/python3.12-galaxy-nggeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/python3x-galaxy-nggeneric*Not reported
Red Hat/python-galaxy-nggeneric*Not reported

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8, Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8, Red Hat/ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported workaround: There is no complete mitigation for this vulnerability. The following measures can reduce risk: 1. Restrict galaxy.change_namespace and galaxy.add_namespace to trusted administrators only, so fewer users can trigger avatar downloads. 2. In cloud deployments, protect instance metadata with hop-limited controls such as AWS IMDSv2 with HttpPutResponseHopLimit=1. 3. Apply egress filtering on Pulp worker nodes so they cannot reach RFC1918, loopback, link-local, or cloud metadata addresses that are not required for normal Galaxy operation.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 25, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  2. Source modified

    Aug 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record

  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 25, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referenceaccess.redhat.com
  • Source referencebugzilla.redhat.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng, the Ansible Galaxy server plugin for Pulp. An authenticated user with namespace management permissions can set a namespace avatar URL to an arbitrary address, including internal networks, loopback, or cloud instance metadata endpoints. A background worker fetches that URL without checking the destination, which lets the attacker probe internal services and enumerate reachable IP addresses. The HTTP client is also configured without an overall timeout, so a slow or non-responsive target can pin workers and cause a denial of service.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • MariaDB: `qc_info` plugin can do OOB reads if query contains \0Same generic ecosystem
  • MariaDB: mysql_json plugin OOB readsSame generic ecosystem
  • MariaDB: environment injection via wsrep bootstrap in the mariadb.service fileSame generic ecosystem
  • MariaDB Connector/C: libmariadb allowed cleartext password leakage on TLS hostname verification failureSame generic ecosystem
  • x64dbg-MCP Server vulnerable to pre-authentication denial of service through Content-Length integer overflowSame generic ecosystem
  • MariaDB: insufficient validation of binary frm data when opening a tableSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
SSRF
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-918
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 9, 2026
References
3 linked sources
Open source record