HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 89140 temporal server internal completion callbacks are
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Medium · CVSS 6.0CVE-2026-89140

Temporal Server internal completion callbacks are not bound to their namespace, allowing cross-namespace changes to Scheduler V2 schedule stateCVE-2026-89140

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-89140 records a Medium severity (CVSS 6.0) vulnerability in Temporal Server internal completion callbacks are not bound to their namespace, allowing cross-namespace changes to Scheduler V2 schedule state. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic), Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic), Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Oct 12, 2026Updated Oct 12, 2026Source checked Oct 12, 2026First seen by HOL Oct 12, 2026Material review Oct 12, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Medium · CVSS 6.0
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 6.0. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic), Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic), Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/servergeneric>=1.30.0 <1.30.81.30.8
Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/servergeneric>=1.31.0 <1.31.41.31.4
Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/servergeneric>=1.32.0 <1.32.11.32.1

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server, Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server, Temporal Technologies, Inc./go.temporal.io/server.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Source-reported solution: Upgrade to Temporal Server 1.30.8, 1.31.4, or 1.32.1, as appropriate for the deployed minor release line. The fix requires no configuration change and adds no setting. When a start request attaches a temporal://internal completion callback, fixed releases decode the component reference in the callback token and reject the request with InvalidArgument unless the reference names both a namespace and a business identifier and its namespace is the namespace of the request. The check runs in the Frontend service when the callback is attached, before it is persisted; it does not apply to callbacks that were attached and persisted before the upgrade, which are delivered as before. Releases before 1.30.0 do not contain the reserved internal callback address and are not affected. On 1.32, completion callbacks attached through Workflow Update are not checked in 1.32.1. That path is off by default and is not a released feature on 1.32: keep history.enableUpdateCallbacks set to false.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Oct 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 12, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Oct 12, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
  • GitHub security advisorygithub.com
Upstream source description

Temporal Server does not bind internal completion callbacks to the namespace that attached them, which allows an authenticated caller with write permission in one namespace to alter Scheduler V2 schedule state in another namespace. The callback address temporal://internal is reserved for callbacks that Scheduler V2 attaches to the Workflows it starts. In affected releases, any authenticated caller could attach a callback with that address to a Workflow start request, the address was exempt from the component.callbacks.allowedAddresses allowlist, and the History service delivered the callback to the component its token named, in whatever namespace that was, without authorizing the original caller there. When the forged completion matches an action a target schedule is running, the schedule records the action as completed while its Workflow still runs, which can defeat an overlap policy such as SKIP, and passes caller-controlled data to the next scheduled Workflow as its last completion result. A forged failure may also pause a schedule configured to pause on failure. A forgery requires the target namespace identifier, the schedule identifier, and the identity and timing of a running action. No disclosure of Workflow payloads or history was identified. Only namespaces that hold Scheduler V2 schedules can be targeted; Scheduler V2 is off by default, and existing Scheduler V2 schedules remain targets after the settings that create them are turned off.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Temporal Server applies inbound namespace replication from a connected peer cluster to local namespacesSame temporal technologies, inc./go.temporal.io/server package
  • OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure via Non-Separator-Aware Path Check in Bleve SearchAlso CWE-639
  • getkirby Kirby Dynamic Option Generation OptionsQuery.php resolve authorizationAlso CWE-639
  • DB2 Recovery Expert for Linux, UNIX and Windows Cross-Site ScriptingSame generic ecosystem
  • IBM Db2 Recovery Expert for Linux, Unix and Windows Cross-Site ScriptingSame generic ecosystem
  • IBM Db2 Recovery Expert for Linux, Unix and Windows Cross-Site ScriptingSame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-639
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 12, 2026
References
10 linked sources
Open source record