HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 89704 nfsd sample writeback error cursor before async
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-89704

nfsd: sample writeback error cursor before async COPY loopCVE-2026-89704

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-89704 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in nfsd: sample writeback error cursor before async COPY loop. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 11, 2026Updated Oct 19, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 11, 2026Material review Oct 19, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <52b2db7a72e19ac2686fa4b2a52406661e7bf9e2 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <8277d4a11ae2cb5495842be558fd946032c24363 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <a1cbafe756cd5e6ab0e099062f37da7a5b081169 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <20a67a7d18221af736f124770c2c5e859b479046 || f14816f2f928c560d28ba344af689f56efcd6f55 || 3145fe0ebb16e1715ad541a301bc6675c8375fcd || >=5.10.124 <5.11 || >=5.15.49 <5.1652b2db7a72e19ac2686fa4b2a52406661e7bf9e2, 8277d4a11ae2cb5495842be558fd946032c24363, a1cbafe756cd5e6ab0e099062f37da7a5b081169, 20a67a7d18221af736f124770c2c5e859b479046, 5.11, 5.16
Linux/Linuxgeneric5.17Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=f14816f2f928c560d28ba344af689f56efcd6f55 <435e4246c7dfff2fbd76dfdbf91975d5d9f788c9 || >=3145fe0ebb16e1715ad541a301bc6675c8375fcd <9f539a1c0791f907eb4e6d04b43178d9962e2def || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <4728504c021656128a07f4693af80ed4a5fcc863 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <322422d66d1a04434a0dcc0c9d3a4c4b3f225117 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <52b2db7a72e19ac2686fa4b2a52406661e7bf9e2 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <8277d4a11ae2cb5495842be558fd946032c24363 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <a1cbafe756cd5e6ab0e099062f37da7a5b081169 || >=555dbf1a9aac6d3150c8b52fa35f768a692f4eeb <20a67a7d18221af736f124770c2c5e859b479046 || >=5.10.124 <5.10.270 || >=5.15.49 <5.15.221435e4246c7dfff2fbd76dfdbf91975d5d9f788c9, 9f539a1c0791f907eb4e6d04b43178d9962e2def, 4728504c021656128a07f4693af80ed4a5fcc863, 322422d66d1a04434a0dcc0c9d3a4c4b3f225117, 52b2db7a72e19ac2686fa4b2a52406661e7bf9e2, 8277d4a11ae2cb5495842be558fd946032c24363, a1cbafe756cd5e6ab0e099062f37da7a5b081169, 20a67a7d18221af736f124770c2c5e859b479046, 5.10.270, 5.15.221

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 52b2db7a72e19ac2686fa4b2a52406661e7bf9e2; Linux/Linux to 435e4246c7dfff2fbd76dfdbf91975d5d9f788c9 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 11, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 11, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: sample writeback error cursor before async COPY loop _nfsd_copy_file_range() samples dst->f_wb_err into "since" after the copy loop, then uses it to detect writeback errors via filemap_check_wb_err() once vfs_fsync_range() returns. Because the nfsd_file cache reuses a single struct file across requests targeting the same inode, a concurrent COMMIT or stable WRITE on dst advances dst->f_wb_err to the current mapping->wb_err via file_check_and_advance_wb_err() during its own vfs_fsync_range(). If that advancement lands between the writeback error appearing in mapping->wb_err and the COPY worker sampling "since", the worker captures the already-advanced cursor, errseq_check() sees cur == since and returns zero, and NFSD4_COPY_F_COMMITTED is set even though writeback failed. CB_OFFLOAD then encodes wr_stable_how = FILE_SYNC4, the client treats the copied data as durable, and the failure becomes silent data loss. Sample since once at the start of the function. The cursor then reflects state in effect before this COPY issues any writes, and filemap_check_wb_err() detects any error that occurs during the copy regardless of which thread first observes it. This matches the pattern used by nfsd_vfs_write() and nfsd4_clone_file_range().

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record