HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 89752 mm memcg stop reclaim when a limit update is
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright ยฉ 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity ยท Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-89752

mm: memcg: stop reclaim when a limit update is supersededCVE-2026-89752

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-89752 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in mm: memcg: stop reclaim when a limit update is superseded. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 11, 2026Updated Oct 19, 2026Source checked Oct 27, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 11, 2026Material review Oct 19, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <39ec1e4183a718f448b2e9de681dcbdda18fce42 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <95d87030cae7764805aa7c621c52871139297cb0 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <aab391074de96ed601eeca32daef9a8507d436d9 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <9477820c63cbf4d97114238f3d1ff10dfd6bee3f || 0ccab5b139971a2a3f48df24d1ee8be2dbf84042 || 97729c37439040ec07807f0dbb71ea60ccbafd27 || >=4.4.7 <4.5 || >=4.5.1 <4.639ec1e4183a718f448b2e9de681dcbdda18fce42, 95d87030cae7764805aa7c621c52871139297cb0, aab391074de96ed601eeca32daef9a8507d436d9, 9477820c63cbf4d97114238f3d1ff10dfd6bee3f, 4.5, 4.6
Linux/Linuxgeneric4.6Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <ebf762a393630d1582645be3f0fc22a674eb9122 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <4ea0617b9e46d26c0a3e5af00308ea1931cc545d || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <5c6f87d33733d96fba66ea4e78cd8b24b4d60a49 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <8bf21ad3657305e28deafd9ef16a121407496bc3 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <39ec1e4183a718f448b2e9de681dcbdda18fce42 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <95d87030cae7764805aa7c621c52871139297cb0 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <aab391074de96ed601eeca32daef9a8507d436d9 || >=b6e6edcfa40561e9c8abe5eecf1c96f8e5fd9c6f <9477820c63cbf4d97114238f3d1ff10dfd6bee3f || 0ccab5b139971a2a3f48df24d1ee8be2dbf84042 || 97729c37439040ec07807f0dbb71ea60ccbafd27 || >=4.4.7 <4.5 || >=4.5.1 <4.6ebf762a393630d1582645be3f0fc22a674eb9122, 4ea0617b9e46d26c0a3e5af00308ea1931cc545d, 5c6f87d33733d96fba66ea4e78cd8b24b4d60a49, 8bf21ad3657305e28deafd9ef16a121407496bc3, 39ec1e4183a718f448b2e9de681dcbdda18fce42, 95d87030cae7764805aa7c621c52871139297cb0, aab391074de96ed601eeca32daef9a8507d436d9, 9477820c63cbf4d97114238f3d1ff10dfd6bee3f, 4.5, 4.6

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 39ec1e4183a718f448b2e9de681dcbdda18fce42; Linux/Linux to ebf762a393630d1582645be3f0fc22a674eb9122 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 11, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 19, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 11, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: memcg: stop reclaim when a limit update is superseded kernfs serializes file operations only per open file, so separate open files can update the same memory.high or memory.max file concurrently. Both handlers store the new limit before synchronous reclaim, but continue to use the writer's local target in the reclaim loop. If another writer raises or removes the limit, the first writer can continue reclaiming toward a stale target. For memory.max, this can leave the writer looping indefinitely once reclaim retries are exhausted. The OOM path sees sufficient margin under the current limit and returns true without killing, while the writer still compares usage against its stale target and records another OOM event. Check the current limit at the start of each reclaim iteration and stop if it no longer matches the writer's target. Reproducer: Populate a cgroup with anonymous memory and disable swapping. Lower memory.max from one open file, then restore it to "max" through another open file after the new limit becomes visible. Without the patch, the first writer remains blocked and repeatedly increments the OOM event counter. With the patch, it returns normally. This was not motivated by a reported production workload. We found it through automated randomized testing for our cgroup observability work and reduced it to the reproducer above.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 27, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record