HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 89975 nvme fabrics fix dhchap secret leak on parse
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-89975

nvme-fabrics: fix DHCHAP secret leak on parse failureCVE-2026-89975

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-89975 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in nvme-fabrics: fix DHCHAP secret leak on parse failure. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 16, 2026Updated Oct 30, 2026Source checked Oct 31, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 16, 2026Material review Oct 30, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Secret Exfiltration
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 31, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
4 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc53702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3, 15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318, d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549, afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc53
Linux/Linuxgeneric6.0Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <3ce0e9b43f355dfa0bdc0e0dd889795752285791 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc533ce0e9b43f355dfa0bdc0e0dd889795752285791, 702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3, 15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318, d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549, afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc53
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <35ec48228f6739339583e5a73ca315156372e30d || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <3ce0e9b43f355dfa0bdc0e0dd889795752285791 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549 || >=f50fff73d620cd6e8f48bc58d4f1c944615a3fea <afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc5335ec48228f6739339583e5a73ca315156372e30d, 3ce0e9b43f355dfa0bdc0e0dd889795752285791, 702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3, 15d7a35a489287109b5a7c157d53d9b8214f0318, d21da6cc91ba1c4f1ae5ba007f3cb89e1c0c7549, afdee49a1b88ed9bb44e2b30e855297c169bcc53

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 702c1ae0d31b44828ec3c87079def490c1ee1fb3; Linux/Linux to 3ce0e9b43f355dfa0bdc0e0dd889795752285791; Linux/Linux to 35ec48228f6739339583e5a73ca315156372e30d if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 16, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 30, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 16, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-fabrics: fix DHCHAP secret leak on parse failure nvmf_parse_options() duplicates dhchap_secret and dhchap_ctrl_secret with match_strdup() before validating the DHHC-1: representation. If validation fails, the parser returns -EINVAL before the temporary string in p is assigned to opts->dhchap_secret or opts->dhchap_ctrl_secret. nvmf_create_ctrl() subsequently frees opts, but nvmf_free_options() cannot release the unassigned temporary string. Each rejected option therefore leaks one allocation. This is easy to miss because valid secrets transfer ownership to opts and are freed normally, while the malformed-secret path still returns the expected -EINVAL to userspace. With CONFIG_NVME_HOST_AUTH enabled, the leak is reachable before the required-option checks and transport lookup. No NVMe-oF target or working transport connection is required; for example, repeatedly writing dhchap_secret=BAD or dhchap_ctrl_secret=BAD to /dev/nvme-fabrics deterministically takes the leaking parse path. Free the temporary string before leaving both validation error paths. Use kfree_sensitive() because the copied option may contain secret material even when its representation is rejected, matching the sensitive cleanup used for stored DHCHAP secrets.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.