HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 90234 nfs return a delegation the client fails to record
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.5CVE-2026-90234

NFS: Return a delegation the client fails to recordCVE-2026-90234

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-90234 records a High severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in NFS: Return a delegation the client fails to record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 17, 2026Updated Oct 30, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 17, 2026Material review Oct 30, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.5
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
5 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.5. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic) and additional mapped packages. Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b3792533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25, 220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b37
Linux/Linuxgeneric4.0Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b376822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19, 92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25, 220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b37
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <9e71e332fa2c7a48f3d00001f856a13cc2d69639 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <fe3b1c8966a27b70599d28ce7e80819adac1ff22 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b379e71e332fa2c7a48f3d00001f856a13cc2d69639, fe3b1c8966a27b70599d28ce7e80819adac1ff22, 6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19, 92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25, 220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b37
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <61b23f482b2082e77d2f78bd1624f93a12ec35ce || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <9e71e332fa2c7a48f3d00001f856a13cc2d69639 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <fe3b1c8966a27b70599d28ce7e80819adac1ff22 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25 || >=ade04647dd56881e285983af3db702d56ee97e86 <220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b3761b23f482b2082e77d2f78bd1624f93a12ec35ce, 9e71e332fa2c7a48f3d00001f856a13cc2d69639, fe3b1c8966a27b70599d28ce7e80819adac1ff22, 6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19, 92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25, 220af23d863995091f0edeb1e6aa0945b3db8b37

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 92533e49fe3c455088657b862cf3562260c0ce25; Linux/Linux to 6822ba1ae9b6df6a094f7f8998f1da734c85fa19; Linux/Linux to 9e71e332fa2c7a48f3d00001f856a13cc2d69639; Linux/Linux to 61b23f482b2082e77d2f78bd1624f93a12ec35ce if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 17, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 30, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 17, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFS: Return a delegation the client fails to record When an NFS server grants a delegation in an OPEN reply, nfs_inode_set_delegation() records it on the client. However, three of its error flows return without sending DELEGRETURN. A delegation can be relinquished only by DELEGRETURN (RFC 8881 Section 20.2.4), so dropping one silently leaves the server believing the client still holds it. If the server happens to recall that delegation, the client answers CB_RECALL with NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE because it has no record of the stateid. The server revokes the delegation and moves it onto its cl_revoked list, because the client never sends the FREE_STATEID that would drain it. Every subsequent SEQUENCE reply then carries SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED, and the client's state manager loops issuing TEST_STATEID across its delegations without ever clearing the condition. The window is easy to reach now that a server offers a write delegation on any write OPEN: a delegation recalled for one opener races a re-open that the server answers with a fresh write delegation. Instead of dropping it, hand the delegation back during these error flows.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.