HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 90326 blk cgroup fix race between policy activation and
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 7.8CVE-2026-90326

blk-cgroup: fix race between policy activation and blkg destructionCVE-2026-90326

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-90326 records a High severity (CVSS 7.8) vulnerability in blk-cgroup: fix race between policy activation and blkg destruction. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 17, 2026Updated Oct 21, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 17, 2026Material review Oct 21, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 7.8
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 7.8. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=81c1188905f88b77743d1fdeeedfc8cb7b67787d <b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc || >=bfe46d2efe46c5c952f982e2ca94fe2ec5e58e2a <083b58373463a6e5ee60ecb135269348f68ad7df || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <ac34e655dffa74349d885a43d098115336f53842 || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <2cf9f50a38c1839e549a08e22aa35e8d69e2c8fd || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <5313d4d41739b0cb63000747c97bb1217ac45f3e || >=6.1.16 <6.1.17 || >=6.2.3 <6.2.4b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc, 083b58373463a6e5ee60ecb135269348f68ad7df, ac34e655dffa74349d885a43d098115336f53842, 2cf9f50a38c1839e549a08e22aa35e8d69e2c8fd, 5313d4d41739b0cb63000747c97bb1217ac45f3e, 6.1.17, 6.2.4
Linux/Linuxgeneric6.3Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=81c1188905f88b77743d1fdeeedfc8cb7b67787d <b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc || >=bfe46d2efe46c5c952f982e2ca94fe2ec5e58e2a <083b58373463a6e5ee60ecb135269348f68ad7df || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <17c18a0df70c2b89ff7fcd74622f1540e98d00fd || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <91062e3a9ed251726df4e20ff9a1113f1c8ded59 || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <ac34e655dffa74349d885a43d098115336f53842 || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <2cf9f50a38c1839e549a08e22aa35e8d69e2c8fd || >=f1c006f1c6850c14040f8337753a63119bba39b9 <5313d4d41739b0cb63000747c97bb1217ac45f3e || >=6.1.16 <6.1.17 || >=6.2.3 <6.2.4b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc, 083b58373463a6e5ee60ecb135269348f68ad7df, 17c18a0df70c2b89ff7fcd74622f1540e98d00fd, 91062e3a9ed251726df4e20ff9a1113f1c8ded59, ac34e655dffa74349d885a43d098115336f53842, 2cf9f50a38c1839e549a08e22aa35e8d69e2c8fd, 5313d4d41739b0cb63000747c97bb1217ac45f3e, 6.1.17, 6.2.4

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc; Linux/Linux to b5dae1cd0d8368b4338430ff93403df67f0b8bcc if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 17, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 21, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 17, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-cgroup: fix race between policy activation and blkg destruction When switching an IO scheduler on a block device, blkcg_activate_policy() allocates blkg_policy_data (pd) for all blkgs attached to the queue. However, blkcg_activate_policy() may race with concurrent blkcg deletion, leading to use-after-free and memory leak issues. The use-after-free occurs in the following race: T1 (blkcg_activate_policy): - Successfully allocates pd for blkg1 (loop0->queue, blkcgA) - Fails to allocate pd for blkg2 (loop0->queue, blkcgB) - Enters the enomem rollback path to release blkg1 resources T2 (blkcg deletion): - blkcgA is deleted concurrently - blkg1 is freed via blkg_free_workfn() - blkg1->pd is freed T1 (continued): - Rollback path accesses blkg1->pd->online after pd is freed - Triggers use-after-free In addition, blkg_free_workfn() frees pd before removing the blkg from q->blkg_list. This allows blkcg_activate_policy() to allocate a new pd for a blkg that is being destroyed, leaving the newly allocated pd unreachable when the blkg is finally freed. Fix these races by extending blkcg_mutex coverage to serialize blkcg_activate_policy() rollback and blkg destruction, ensuring pd lifecycle is synchronized with blkg list visibility.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
7 linked sources
Open source record