Answer in brief
CVE-2026-92525 records a High severity (CVSS 7.1) vulnerability in RDMA/rxe: Validate num_sge/cur_sge before indexing wqe->dma.sge[]. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
CVSS is 7.1. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <69d3ccf6543f24c452a020c8028ca6f46cb1e8db || >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <750bba6ce9bb0b11d6a166031c9728ae3f21765e || >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <c067aa7b231e91a18a1b3666201ab14dfb00347a || >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <13cb7160e5b791f5e3ecf9311cf32849fe7e9b62 || >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <5ec111ddc1f727c1e4580aea459842ae5a8359a5 || >=8700e3e7c4857d28ebaa824509934556da0b3e76 <126c757e4cd46f866ddc283143b58eb4d9bf52cd | 69d3ccf6543f24c452a020c8028ca6f46cb1e8db, 750bba6ce9bb0b11d6a166031c9728ae3f21765e, c067aa7b231e91a18a1b3666201ab14dfb00347a, 13cb7160e5b791f5e3ecf9311cf32849fe7e9b62, 5ec111ddc1f727c1e4580aea459842ae5a8359a5, 126c757e4cd46f866ddc283143b58eb4d9bf52cd |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 4.8 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Sep 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Oct 19, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Sep 17, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rxe: Validate num_sge/cur_sge before indexing wqe->dma.sge[] For a user QP, qp->sq.queue is a ring the application writes directly, so rxe_post_send() takes the is_user branch and only schedules send_task without validating the WQE. rxe_requester() consumes it in place via req_next_wqe() and calls copy_data(), which indexes &wqe->dma.sge[cur_sge] with the attacker-controlled num_sge/cur_sge. Only the kernel path bounds num_sge (validate_send_wr()); the user WQE is never checked, so a local unprivileged user can post a WQE with an out-of-range cur_sge or oversized num_sge and force an out-of-bounds read of the per-WQE sge array in copy_data() (vmalloc OOB read, local DoS). Bound num_sge to qp->sq.max_sge in rxe_requester() before use, the way get_srq_wqe() already guards SRQ entries, and bound cur_sge only when the WQE carries payload (dma.resid): copy_data() returns early on a zero-length copy before touching dma->sge[], so a zero-payload WQE -- the only kind a max_sge == 0 QP can post -- stays valid. Reproduced under KASAN; the vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_data() is gone.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.