HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorKeep agent security open: sponsor a project, place a banner, or fund a security initiative.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 9254 command injection vulnerability in parent control
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
High · CVSS 8.7CVE-2026-9254

Command Injection Vulnerability in Parent Control of Multiple TP-Link Archer DevicesCVE-2026-9254

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-9254 records a High severity (CVSS 8.7) vulnerability in Command Injection Vulnerability in Parent Control of Multiple TP-Link Archer Devices. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer AX75 V1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE3600 V1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE800 V1 (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Aug 24, 2026Updated Aug 28, 2026Source checked Oct 9, 2026First seen by HOL Aug 24, 2026Material review Aug 28, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
High · CVSS 8.7
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

CVSS is 8.7. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer AX75 V1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE3600 V1 (generic), TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE800 V1 (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer AX75 V1generic>=0 <1.1.6 Build 2607161.1.6 Build 260716, 1.1.6
TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE3600 V1generic>=0 <1.2.6 Build 202606171.2.6 Build 20260617, 1.2.6
TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE800 V1generic>=0 <1.4.2 Build 2607081.4.2 Build 260708, 1.4.2

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer AX75 V1, TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE3600 V1, TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE800 V1.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer AX75 V1 to 1.1.6 Build 260716; TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE3600 V1 to 1.2.6 Build 20260617; TP-Link Systems Inc./Archer BE800 V1 to 1.4.2 Build 260708 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Aug 24, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Aug 28, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Aug 24, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
  • Source referencetp-link.com
Upstream source description

An unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in the parental control functionality of Archer BE800 V1, BE3600 V1, and AX75 V1 due to improper filtering and neutralization of special characters in certain parameters. A LAN-based attacker can inject arbitrary commands and execute them with root privileges. Successful exploitation may result in complete device compromise and impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected device and network traffic.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Related CVEs

  • Unauthenticated JSON API Authorization Bypass Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo C325WBSame generic ecosystem
  • Unauthenticated RTSP Tunnel Denial-of-Service Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo C325WBSame generic ecosystem
  • Predictable Media Stream Pre-Shared Key Vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo C325WBSame generic ecosystem
  • Eog: eog: arbitrary code execution via heap buffer overflow in png metadata readerSame generic ecosystem
  • fast-jwt treats raw public JWK JSON as an HMAC secret, enabling HS256 token forgerySame generic ecosystem
  • Hazelcast: Authorization bypass in IMap Predicates APISame generic ecosystem

Record context

Vulnerability class
Command Injection
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
CWE-78
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Oct 9, 2026
References
8 linked sources
Open source record