Answer in brief
CVE-2026-93073 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in dax: read holder_ops once in dax_holder_notify_failure(). The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <1661b9bf78def01a8c96409569772d9b2592f4ba || >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <0a42180d5410c98829ee72d1d426fb7faf9e6873 || >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <ee1251621d1c7cf3155c6704542cbb358d799968 || >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <6a37acecc7c29136235cbc446a1b89e81414344b || >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <eb412f80311fc7ab6eb3203091a3fe59a5e9fd30 || >=8012b866085523758780850087102421dbcce522 <7ae9d15bdcde0f2955ae13b6a95587f9e23b2359 | 1661b9bf78def01a8c96409569772d9b2592f4ba, 0a42180d5410c98829ee72d1d426fb7faf9e6873, ee1251621d1c7cf3155c6704542cbb358d799968, 6a37acecc7c29136235cbc446a1b89e81414344b, eb412f80311fc7ab6eb3203091a3fe59a5e9fd30, 7ae9d15bdcde0f2955ae13b6a95587f9e23b2359 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.0 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Sep 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Sep 17, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dax: read holder_ops once in dax_holder_notify_failure() dax_holder_notify_failure() reads dax_dev->holder_ops twice without READ_ONCE() -- once for the NULL check and once for the indirect notify_failure() call. A concurrent fs_put_dax() can clear holder_ops between the two reads, so the check can observe a non-NULL pointer while the call dereferences NULL. (kill_dax() also clears holder_ops, but only after synchronize_srcu(), so it cannot race a reader that is inside dax_read_lock(); fs_put_dax() does no such synchronization.) Fetch holder_ops once into a local with READ_ONCE() so the NULL check and the indirect call observe the same value.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.