HOL LogoGuard

Explore HOL

  • HOL home
  • AI agent registry
  • AI plugins
  • Open standards
  • HOL members
  • Sponsor HOL
  • Advertise with HOL

Guard product

  • Guard overviewLocal security and control for AI agents and the tools they use.
  • FeaturesRuntime protection, policy routing, review, and evidence.

Explore Guard

  • Product previewWalk through Guard surfaces in read-only demo mode.
  • ComparisonCompare Guard with native controls and AI security vendors.

AI tools

  • All AI toolsEvery supported AI tool and how Guard applies policy to it.
  • Codex
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Antigravity CLI
  • OpenCode
  • Hermes
  • OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • Antigravity
  • Kimi
  • Grok
  • Pi / Oh My Pi
  • Zcode

Extensions

  • All extensionsBrowse command and MCP coverage with owners and stated limits.
  • Command coverageShell command protection across clouds, databases, backups, and packages.
  • MCP server coverageSee how Guard maps risk state across MCP tools and servers.
  • Core safetyThe safety floor listings that ship with Guard.
  • Data and resilienceBackup and storage command protection.
  • Cloud and infrastructureAWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and more.

Security

  • AI security hubSecurity research, advisories, and agent safety coverage.
  • AI tool securitySecurity profiles for each supported coding agent.
  • Safe labsHands-on attack simulations with safe boundaries.
  • Redacted warningsReal blocked actions with sensitive details removed.
  • AdvisoriesCoordinated disclosure reports for AI tooling.
  • Active CVEsSearch active CVEs affecting AI tooling.

Learn

  • Security guidesPractical guides for securing AI agent workflows.
  • DocsInstall, configure, and operate Guard with confidence.
  • ResearchPublished security research, benchmarks, and methodology.

Community

  • ReleasesVersion history, shipped changes and upgrade notes.
  • ContributorsThe people and contributions behind HOL Guard.
  • AffiliatesShare Guard with your audience and earn from referrals.
  • SponsorFund agreed research, implementation and shared testing through the HOL Partner Program.
  • AdvertiseCompare README logo placements, previews and monthly prices, or promote a plugin or extension.
PricingEnterpriseOpen AppInstall Guard
  1. Guard
  2. Security
  3. CVEs
  4. CVE 2026 93085 firmware armscmi reject out of range dt protocol
HOL Guard

Public security guidance for teams protecting AI harnesses, MCP servers, skills, prompts, and local tool execution.

Install Guard

AI Security

  • Prompt injection
  • MCP security
  • OWASP MCP mapping
  • Supply chain

Resources

  • Trust packet
  • Harness setup
  • Redacted warnings
  • Safe labs

Product

  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
  • Open dashboard
Guard
  • Guard Overview
  • Releases
  • Contributors
  • Install Guard
  • Pricing
Docs
  • Documentation Index
  • Developer Hub
  • API Reference
  • Root OpenAPI
  • Registry OpenAPI
  • Run in Postman
  • Standards
  • Submit ERC-8004 Contract
  • Feature Your Agent
Best Plugins
  • Browse Plugins
  • Plugin Launches
  • Best Claude Plugins
  • Best Codex Plugins
  • Best Grok Plugins
  • Best Kimi Plugins
  • Best DeepSeek Plugins
  • Best Antigravity Plugins
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best Cursor Plugins
  • Best OpenCode Plugins
Best Agents
  • Best ERC-8004 Agents
  • Best Virtuals Agents
  • Best MCP Servers
  • Best A2A Agents
  • Best x402 Payable
  • All Categories
Community
  • Telegram
  • X
More
  • About HOL
  • Sponsor
  • Advertise
  • Affiliate program
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
Settings

Copyright © 2026 HOL DAO LLC. All rights reserved.

Back to active CVEs
Unknown severity · Source severity not reportedCVE-2026-93085

firmware: arm_scmi: Reject out of range DT protocol IDsCVE-2026-93085

Answer in brief

CVE-2026-93085 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in firmware: arm_scmi: Reject out of range DT protocol IDs. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Analysis pending evidence review

HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.

Published Sep 17, 2026Updated Oct 30, 2026Source checked Nov 1, 2026First seen by HOL Sep 17, 2026Material review Oct 30, 2026
Upstream Advisory

Key facts

Risk
Unknown severitySource severity not reported
Exploitation
Not marked as known exploited
Affected software
3 mapped packages or products
Fix availability
Available

Why this deserves its current priority

A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.

Analysis status

Analysis pending evidence review

Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.

Affected scope and exposure questions

The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.

Mapped affected packages and fixed versions
PackageAffected rangeFixed version
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <8eb2ab209570526728b35e39c4aecdb5099fbaf7 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <5142fd31bd8c9aff9bad4f6e0cc20e9574f2cee1 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <e66756313d1b4eadd13f39a0aee9fc8773d4d375 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <0b6e59eb885f985a5ea7beed385adfa9412b324d || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <59407ccb52130f2c81f4b3cbe4f14114afceb54f8eb2ab209570526728b35e39c4aecdb5099fbaf7, 5142fd31bd8c9aff9bad4f6e0cc20e9574f2cee1, e66756313d1b4eadd13f39a0aee9fc8773d4d375, 0b6e59eb885f985a5ea7beed385adfa9412b324d, 59407ccb52130f2c81f4b3cbe4f14114afceb54f
Linux/Linuxgeneric6.3Not reported
Linux/Linuxgeneric>=22f7f35fd71b597a5d916e41d7646be6ee530c86 <75d6273a28cdb543a167ac5fbfca75dc286ffe10 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <8eb2ab209570526728b35e39c4aecdb5099fbaf7 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <5142fd31bd8c9aff9bad4f6e0cc20e9574f2cee1 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <e66756313d1b4eadd13f39a0aee9fc8773d4d375 || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <0b6e59eb885f985a5ea7beed385adfa9412b324d || >=05a2801d8b90c1b5159618d4bd3a3c65d60f3ff1 <59407ccb52130f2c81f4b3cbe4f14114afceb54f75d6273a28cdb543a167ac5fbfca75dc286ffe10, 8eb2ab209570526728b35e39c4aecdb5099fbaf7, 5142fd31bd8c9aff9bad4f6e0cc20e9574f2cee1, e66756313d1b4eadd13f39a0aee9fc8773d4d375, 0b6e59eb885f985a5ea7beed385adfa9412b324d, 59407ccb52130f2c81f4b3cbe4f14114afceb54f

Recommended response

  1. 1Check inventory. Check lockfiles and deployed manifests for Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux, Linux/Linux.
  2. 2Review the reported fix. Update Linux/Linux to 8eb2ab209570526728b35e39c4aecdb5099fbaf7; Linux/Linux to 75d6273a28cdb543a167ac5fbfca75dc286ffe10 if you use the affected versions. Test the change in a non-production environment first.

Evidence timeline and material changes

  1. Published upstream

    Sep 17, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  2. Source modified

    Oct 30, 2026

    Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:record
  3. First seen by HOL

    Sep 17, 2026

Sources and claim methodology

  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
  • Source referencegit.kernel.org
Upstream source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware: arm_scmi: Reject out of range DT protocol IDs SCMI protocol IDs carried in message headers are limited by MSG_PROTOCOL_ID_MASK. The DT parsing paths noticed protocol IDs outside that range, but only logged an error and then kept processing the invalid value. That lets a malformed 32-bit DT reg value reach helpers which take a u8 protocol ID, where it can be truncated and/or treated as a different protocol. For channel setup, two different out-of-range values can also be used as distinct IDR keys while aliasing the generated SCMI protocol identity. Skip DT protocol nodes whose reg value does not fit the SCMI protocol ID field before setting up channels or creating protocol devices.

Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.

Record context

Vulnerability class
Vulnerability
EPSS
Not reported
CWE IDs
Not reported
Source
CVE List V5
Source checked
Nov 1, 2026
References
6 linked sources
Open source record