Answer in brief
CVE-2026-93134 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in printk: Fix possible console use-after-free. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic), Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=c158834b223fbfab3a14855ac203b8d9cddbbefd <f0104a7b730de32eefb3d4a27279592b5504ad59 || >=c158834b223fbfab3a14855ac203b8d9cddbbefd <fbf9bb81b21537ede387a31cc586f1d2ce66a74e || >=c158834b223fbfab3a14855ac203b8d9cddbbefd <8f194dee0c0d1223255bae1429e1939882f540fc || >=c158834b223fbfab3a14855ac203b8d9cddbbefd <36630cafbeede0b64c370edb2f7b4094327ee1e0 | f0104a7b730de32eefb3d4a27279592b5504ad59, fbf9bb81b21537ede387a31cc586f1d2ce66a74e, 8f194dee0c0d1223255bae1429e1939882f540fc, 36630cafbeede0b64c370edb2f7b4094327ee1e0 |
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | 6.12 | Not reported |
Published upstream
Sep 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 17, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Sep 17, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: printk: Fix possible console use-after-free When emitting a record via legacy printing, it is possible that a handover to another legacy printing context occurs. When a context has performed a handover, the console SRCU read lock is released and the pointer to the console struct might now be invalid. Therefore, after calling nbcon_legacy_emit_next_record() or console_emit_next_record(), it is necessary to check if a handover occurred _before_ further @con usage. Sashiko pointed out that console_flush_one_record() was not doing this. In console_flush_one_record(), after emitting a record, move the further usage of @con after the handover check.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.