Answer in brief
CVE-2026-97435 records a Unknown severity vulnerability in net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
Analysis pending evidence review
HOL Guard separates source facts from reviewed analysis. See the methodology.
A CVSS score is not reported in the current record. The current sources do not mark it as known exploited. Treat this as a source-backed prioritization signal, not a statement about your environment.
Analysis status
Analysis pending evidence review
Factual feed record only; HOL analysis is not approved for indexing. Read the methodology.
The current feed maps Linux/Linux (generic). Check affected ranges and fixed versions before updating.
| Package | Affected range | Fixed version |
|---|---|---|
| Linux/Linuxgeneric | >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <c999cc39775381b68ed66eae57c1425452672c0f || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <abd7511e12b231798332afa04ed9bee9e84f9445 || >=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <cfa5274a5dc2a23b957da5dc806d2ac0c7a66af0 || >=0 <6.12.111 || >=0 <6.18.53 | c999cc39775381b68ed66eae57c1425452672c0f, abd7511e12b231798332afa04ed9bee9e84f9445, cfa5274a5dc2a23b957da5dc806d2ac0c7a66af0, 6.12.111, 6.18.53 |
Published upstream
Sep 24, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordSource modified
Sep 24, 2026
Evidence: source:cvelist:source_dates:source-dates:recordFirst seen by HOL
Sep 25, 2026
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect dsa_port_from_netdev() may return a valid port from a different switch chip. Programming another chip's port index into the local hardware causes redirection to the wrong port, or an out-of-bounds access if the index exceeds the local chip's port count. Apply a minimal fix that adds a check to catch this case and adjusts the extack message. When cls->common.skip_sw is not set, the operation could instead redirect to the upstream port and let the software or upstream switch(es) handle the forward, but that is not addressed here.
Quoted source text, attributed separately from HOL analysis.